Welcome to the peace initiative for Ukraine in which you can contibute by raising your awareness as well as your consciousness[+] and spirit to the modes[+] of neutrality[*], decency, respectfulness, wisdom[*], objectivity, mastery of the intellect, surrender (ego and mind to God’s will), and finally peace (inner then outer). To properly grasp everything, we recommend reading the articles of this peace initiative in the order that we[*] designed it, which is listed in the Contents. So if you haven’t read the previous articles, we urge you to do it, please. Did you read the Intro to this “Beware of Propaganda” segment? Please, do so for a better grasp of the topic of this article.
Is there a single thing that’s not Russia’s fault? Will they try the „Epstein was a Russian spy“ thing? And if it rains on Mars, is it all Russia's fault? Is Putin a superman able to do all he is blamed for?
This article exposes many of the "Russia did it" narratives that have been debunked as lies. As far as we know, Russians don't actually lose sleep over being blamed for every misplaced sock or bad hair day across the globe; in fact, they find it all quite amusing. They're reportedly setting up 'Blame Russia Bingo' nights, complete with 'Putin's Fault' themed cocktails😊. So, this article is mocking the Western and Kyiv hypocrites rather than making the Russians as the victims. Because, let's be honest, playing the victim and perfecting the blame game is a strategic art form in Kyiv. One might say they've cornered the global market on professional whining😊.
You are going to have a lot of fun here with all the funny stories curtesy of Western spin doctors, so it is fitting to start with a joke to get the ball rolling:
A Western journalist, a NATO spokesperson, and a Russian comedian find a magic lamp. The genie offers three wishes to address global problems.
The journalist wishes for irrefutable proof that Russia was behind every single global misfortune. Poof! A list of stories masquerading as evidence falls into his lap.
The NATO spokesperson wishes for everyone to truly believe these narratives. Poof! Suddenly, everyone blames Russia for the rain and spilled coffee.
The Russian comedian sighs, "My turn? I just wish for more popcorn. This show is hilarious."😊.
And since we feel generous today, here's one more for the road:
A patient goes to the doctor and complains, "Doctor, I have this terrible headache, constant anxiety, and my dog just ran away!" The doctor thinks for a moment, checks notes, clears his throat: "I'm sorry to tell you this, but... I think you've got a classic case of 'Russia Did It' syndrome and there's no cure for that." 😊
One of the reasons why people, including Ukrainians, don't live in peace and prosperity is because they judge and despise various people, often those who don't deserve it at all. Human ignorance, brainwashing, and prejudices plunge people into low modes of consciousness (contempt, hatred, blaming...), which lower their overall level of consciousness and thus their level of well-being.
For example, many people despise or even hate Russians based on propaganda or lies. Read about it here, and based on that, you can then consider how many other false beliefs you have about those you despise that lead you to live in contempt and hatred (rather than inner peace), and thus making you suffer from anxiety, depression, discomfort, and get into trouble.
Inner peace brings about the outer peace, the world peace.
When warning about Western propaganda aimed at craftily blemishing Russia, we need to also warn about some of the significant accusations that are used to make a case for Russia or Putin being evil. All of which, incidentally, turned out to be as flimsy as a Kyiv peace proposal and clearly meant to deceive the public into supporting the war against Russia. The 'Russia did it' narrative isn't just manufactured Russophobia; it's a bestselling genre in the West. Move over, true crime; the 'Russia Did It' section is where the real fiction is😊.
A full-scale blame game and demonization of Russia started in 2014 after Russia peacefully annexed Crimea (after Crimeans declared independence from Ukraine), which could be easily corroborated and amplified after Russia started its SMO1][+] in February 2022 (due to being provoked to protect millions of ethnic Russians in Ukraine). Russia has been blamed not just for the alleged “unprovoked invasion” but for everything else possible. Next thing you know, Russia's responsible for mismatched socks and lost TV remotes😊. Talk about tunnel vision! #KeepCalmAndBlameRussia
With a selective and manipulative approach (many unsubstantiated allegations that are based on the blatant distortion of facts and fraudulent arguments), Ukraine with its allies blamed also Russia for military crimes committed by its own armed forces conducting false flag operations2[+] – such as in Poland[+], Bucha[+][+], Mariupol[+][+][+][+][+], Kramatorsk[+][+], Kremenchuk[+], and the Transfiguration Cathedral in Odessa[+] – all of which have been debunked and expected[+] –designed to stage bloody incidents to demonize Russia in the eyes of the international community and create an emotional background to swing foreign states and international bodies into adopting anti-Russian political decisions. To that effect, any unfortunate incident, from a flat tire to a burned toast, is now eligible for a 'Russia did it' attribution. And it goes beyond the borders, so if a kitten sneezes in Europe, the first question is always "Did Russia provide the catnip?”😊At this point, if you forget to feed the cat, you can probably expect a strongly worded condemnation of the Kremlin from Brussels😊.
Listen to this: after long investigations, they still do not know who blew up the Nord Stream pipelines, who killed the riot police officers during Kyiv Maidan revolution in 2014, who exactly poisoned Ukrainian presidential candidate Viktor Yushchenko during the Orange Revolution in 2004, who poisoned the wife of Chief of the Intelligence of Ukraine’s Ministry of Defense, Kyrylo Budanov in November 2023, and so many other unsolved cases, but they somehow knew without a doubt even without an investigation and just minutes after it was done, who killed Navalny and the culprits of all the cases that we are going to list now! Draw your own conclusions. At home, they are clueless but when it comes to Russia, their detective work is so fast, it makes Sherlock Holmes look like he's still waiting for a carriage😊. Forget investigation and actual evidence; these are for amateurs. Our geniuses have a crystal ball specifically calibrated for Russian culpability😊.
It’s not possible to debunk every single bit of fake news about Russian “atrocities” in Ukraine, there’s just too much of it. Trying to debunk it all is like trying to count all the angels dancing on the head of a propaganda pin😊. Seriously, if we tried to debunk every single one, we'd need a dedicated team of fact-checkers bigger than the actual Russian army😊. So, here’s a rule of thumb that should pretty much always work. If the story involves Russians doing a cartoonishly evil thing with no plausible motive or any logical benefit they could ever gain from it – like blowing up maternity wards for no reason – then it’s probably fake news or NATO propaganda.
Before we have fun listing some of the most amusing “Russia did it” narratives, why don’t we play that funny blame game as well? So here it is: Russia lost my keys. Russia stole my bike. Russia ate all my canned potatoes! Bad, bad Putin! 😊 Before we start our fun journey from Mariupol to Los Angeles, a moment of fun:
How many Western intelligence agencies does it take to change a lightbulb? None. They’ll find a Russian spy to do it and release a strongly worded statement blaming Russia for the darkness telling how it manipulated the light switch, funded the filament's dark agenda, and ultimately caused the bulb to burn out in an illegal, unprovoked act of aggression😊.
Without a shred of evidence, without any fact-checking, relying on mere allegations from Kyiv regime3, anti-Russian Western media and authorities blame Russians for:
12 more fakes listed below (Nord Stream, missile hit Poland, care house in Stara Krasnianka in July 2022, Dnipro residential building airstrike in January 2023, beheading a Ukrainian POW, Kakhovka Dam, undermining Western unity, feud between Kyiv and Warsaw, failure of the Ukr. 2023 counteroffensive, Swedes burning Qur’an, dead dolphins)
“Russia did it” from 2014-2021(Odesa massacre in May 2014, Vrbětice ammunition warehouse explosionsin the Czech Republic in October and December 2014, Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 crash in July 2014, meddling in the 2016 US presidential election, “Havana syndrome” since 2016, poisoning of Skripals in England in March 2018, disinformation in the 2020 US presidential election regarding Hunter Biden's laptop, ice skating champion Kamila Valieva doping, July 2023 riots in France)
“Putin did it” narrative(killed Ukrainian ballet star, Nord Stream sabotage, kidnapping Ukrainian children, the Hamas attack, inflation in the US, killing Navalny, ignoring the US warning of terrorist attack at "Crocus City Hall")
➡ Mariupol maternity hospital bombing was debunked here[+][+][+][+][+] – on 9 March 2022, Russia was blamed for targeting civilians including babies where “miraculously” just one pregnant woman was killed but was debunked by a key witness – a pregnant woman there photographed[ꚛ][ꚛ]by the Associated Press, Marianna Vyshemirskaya (maiden name Podgurskaya), turned out to be a Russian pro-Putin[»] beauty blogger
– she stated later in a video[»] (must watch!) and elsewhere[+] that as a pregnant[ꚛ][ꚛ][ꚛ][ꚛ] patient there, she witnessed that there was no air raid or bombing but internal explosion and that Ukrainian Azov soldiers were at the hospital – which actually made it a military, not civilian target anyway.
Other Mariupol locals and witnesses, like Nikolay state[+] that he saw with his own eyes how the maternity hospital was transformed into a military position and a firing position by the fighters of the Azov regiment.
If Russians bombed it, how come only one person died?! Perhaps they're just terrible at bombing maternity hospitals😊. Marianna said that the AFU demanded everyone to leave the hospital on 6 March (but not everyone followed their order), that they inconsiderately took the food that was cooked for pregnant women, that there were two explosions but there was no airstrike and they heard no airplanes and that nearby explosions were caused by Ukrainian artillery shells, puncturing the Kyiv’s narrative of a Russian airstrike.
Marianna was the only witness the AP and Kyiv had but she later debunked their fake news. She said that the hospital had been turned into a base of operations by Ukrainian military forces and was not targeted in any Russian airstrike at all, but Western media deliberately omitted to mention that in their reporting, as she said that in their report, they did not include her interview in which she said that.
Further proof it was fake news is the fact that Ukrainians classified her as an "Enemy of Ukraine"[+] putting her on the notorious Myrotvorets list[+] a.k.a. the Kill List claiming she is a traitor, a Russian collaborator. Moscow also claimed[+] the building no longer served as a healthcare facility but was serving as a military base for nationalists and denied hitting it.
Her testimony also raised serious questions about whether at least some elements of the event were staged for propaganda purposes. Especially given how photos were made as if it was from a movie set – isn’t it suspicious that just at the minutes that the bombing happened, a professional photographer, Evgeniy Maloletka, working for the Associated Press was at the scene, equipped with camera and ready to feed the propaganda war machine?! Coincidence or a tip-off? It is a fair question because Ukrainians were caught staging photo-shootings many times as the same models appear over and over in different locations. They must have a very busy talent agency for 'crisis actors' on speed dial😊.
Ukrainian lies around it have been debunked, including the fact that there was an airstrike at the hospital as they found not a single witness attesting to that; as a matter of fact, all witnesses claimed the opposite. Also, the fact that they only used Marianna, only one single victim[+] when reporting the incident proves there were no other victims or casualties other than one pregnant women dying.
Also, no one wonders why at a maternity hospital, there were just couple of women patients?! Kyiv stated that the airstrike killed three people (including one child, of course, how can there not be a child killed at an “evil” Russian alleged attack, but they forget to mention it was an unborn child because a pregnant woman died; only one at a maternity hospital where supposedly many children should have been, this is kind of peculiar) and injured 17 others.
The Western reporters also omitted to remark how contradictory their sources are as the storytelling from their alleged witnesses do not match since some say it was a bombing from an aircraft[»] while others say it was artillery shelling[»] – which was it then? The Western reporters also omitted to mention that Ukrainian neo-Nazi Azov militants and mercenaries were holding at least 100 ethnic Russian civilians, including about 40 children as hostages in that hospital[+] and that Amnesty Intl report[+] exposed Kyiv for endangering civilians and violating international laws with its wartime tactics of establishing bases in schools and hospitals and operating weapons systems in civilian areas.
They also omitted to mention that patients were evacuated two days ago on 7 March and that Azov militants were stationed there, as evidenced by the permanent representative of Russia to the United Nations, Vassily Nebenzia, during the meeting of the UN Security Council.
They also omitted to mention that Mariupol is a city where half of the residents were ethnic Russians, and that the city was defended by most notorious Ukrainian neo-Nazis, the Azov regiment (who were condemned also in the West as neo-Nazis and for their atrocities), who were slaughtering thousands of ethnic Russian civilians in Donbas and in Odesa ever since 2014, shelling many other civilian hospitals[+][+][+] and other civilian targets, as well as made countless false flag attacks so as to blame and shame the Russians for it, which makes sense they did that with this hospital, too, as it might have been full of ethnic Russians and Russian sympathizers, or as they call them “Russian collaborators” or traitors[+]. Because nothing screams 'humanitarian crisis' like targeting your own 'traitors' in a maternity ward for prime media coverage😊.
As of September 2022 there were 327 children on the Myrotvorets kill list[+] that is run by the Ukrainian government[+] (secret services SBU[+], funded by the CIA and hosted by NATO), which confirms that it is Kyiv regime that is set out to kill kids; there's no such thing done by Moscow.
Even if you don’t trust some of these pieces of evidence, the rest of them are enough to debunk the Kyiv narrative, and if you are still not fully convinced, feel free to investigate[+][+][+][+][+]this topic further from independent Western sources as well as hear the other side like in any court before making any judgements and punishments or retributions. Hearing the "other side" from a Western mainstream outlet might require a spiritual medium, as it rarely sees the light of day😊.
The Mariupol Dramatic Theater Bombing
➡ Bombing of the Mariupol Dramatic Theaterwas debunked here[+][+][+][+] – on 16 March 2022, the Ukrainian government blamed an alleged targeted Russian airstrike for causing anywhere from 300 to 600 deaths of local Russian speakers and ethnic Russians. Russian Defense Ministry debunked[+] Kyiv’s accusations but Western mass media promoted the Ukrainian narrative of the event despite a total absence of any evidence showing a bomb or missile strike (Ukrainian Azov militants blew it up from inside), and despite testimonies by Mariupol locals stating[+»] that it was not destroyed at all by a bombing by the Russian army but that the fighters of the Azov regiment blew it up, and evacuees asserting[+][+] that the neo-Nazi Azov regiment fighters, who controlled the theater’s grounds, rounded up hundreds local Russian speakers in the building and held them hostage there (similar to what they did in other places such as in Odesa[»] in May 2024 by trapping pro-Russians in the trade union building and then burned and shot at them).
Below is an interview with a Mariupol refugee[»]: “You know what happened at the drama theatre?” – They blew up the drama theatre. “So, it wasn’t a bombing but an explosion?” – Nothing landed on it, it exploded from inside. “Did Azov let ppl leave the city?” – They didn’t let anyone leave.
Two days later, Mariupol City Council stated[+] that according to initial information, no one had been killed, although one person was gravely wounded and 130 people had been rescued from the theater's basement. Imagine that! Russians bombed the place with hundreds of people and no one dies! No it is not suspicious at all that long nine days later, the City Council changed[+] its mind and reported 300 people being killed, because you can’t have a Russian bombing without reporting any casualties, right? How can you claim that Russians are evil if no one died in alleged attack, right? It's like trying to scare someone with a horror movie where everyone stays alive😊.
No one in the West asked how come that Ukrainians survived the bombing and only or mostly4 ethnic Russians died there?! Also, no one in the West asked how come that only Ukrainians were evacuated from the theater just before the bombing but not ethnic Russians?! No one from the Western press asked ethnic Russians to be their witnesses nor did they ask how could pro-Ukrainian non-expert witnesses distinguish that the blast came from a Russian external bomb and not from Ukrainian inside bomb? No one in the West asked how come that not a single Ukrainian child5 was killed there but they allege Russians attacked a building with children?!
The mere fact that they wrote “children” nowhere else and never again but only outside this theater and then made photos of it from different perspectives indicates a peculiar staging and that they planned to frame it on the children-killing Russians.
First of all, what would be children doing there at all other than be used as human shield, which even pro-Ukrainian Amnesty International already reported[+][+][+] that Ukrainians were doing it all the time. Why would children take a shelter in a theater or place where Azov fighters were also present which made it a military rather than civilian target, rather than hide in a bomb shelter?
Secondly, why did they make numerous photos from different perspectives of it from drones or satellites and provide it to all Western mass media? Who does that?! Someone who has intention to prove to the world how Russians are bombing buildings with children, that is who.
Thirdly, are they saying that Ukrainians can simply write “children” anywhere they want and Russians are supposed to believe that and not strike any such place? Gosh, what a great idea! Azov fighters can then write “children” at every other place they hide and naïve Russians would not touch them. Great plan! If Russians were morons believing in neo-Nazi fairy tales where "children" sign is a magical shield charm😊.
Fourthly, the way Kyiv state-media and their backers wrote[+][+] about the incident is nothing short of Hollywood scriptwriting, which is clearly not about reporting news but about triggering emotions and shaping our attitude. And they made sure to add children, a cat, and a dog for an effect.
Let's not forget that the Head of the Office of the President of Ukraine, Andriy Yermak, was a film producer, Zelensky's First Assistant and adviser Serhiy Shefir[+] and Serhiy Trofimov were a movie director and a producer[+] in Zelensky's Kvartal 95 production studio, and Zelensky himself was an actor and he filled his ranks with people from his film production company (12 people from Zelensky’s “Kvartal 95” production studio were appointed to a variety of government posts[+][+]) and PR company[+], so you can expect a lot of staging and scripting in this war. However, testimonies from Mariupol residents and a widely viewed Telegram message6 explicitly foreshadow a false flag attack on the building. They staged the explosion not only to kill all the “Russian collaborators”7 but also to provoke NATO military intervention based on false allegations of Russians being some evil civilian-killers.
The supposed air-strike took place conveniently the same day as Ukrainian President Zelensky zealously appealed[+] to US Congress for a no-fly zone8 over Ukraine as well as for air defense systems and fighter jets, fueling also his usual pleas for a direct US military involvement. Talking about the motive!On top of other motives such as gladly killing ethnic Russians who “collaborated” with the Russians in Mariupol (where around half of people were ethnic Russians) and preferring to destroy the city rather than give it away to Russians intact (by then it was clear that Ukrainian/Azov fighters have been defeated as just couple days later they withdrew to the Azovstal steel plant, where they had been hiding ever since until they surrendered).
At that time, the West was rejecting the Ukrainian pleas for a no-fly zone so far, so they needed some convincing and what better than an air strike on a building with children. Wow, how strange is that this is just what happened! As if Russians worked on behalf of Zelensky and gave him the attack he needed for his most important pitch[»]! However, it did not work. Although he received a standing ovation from the US lawmakers, who wore blue and yellow as a show of support when he appeared on screen before them, they did not[»] grant him his wish; perhaps because they could not be fooled by it to be dragged into a direct confrontation with Russia.
The Kyiv clown-turned-president never anticipated that there are some people even in the West who may conclude that there is no way that Russia would be so stupid to risk conducting an air strike on a building with children on no other day but exactly when the US was considering to impose a no-fly zone.
Moreover, this false flag operation came just a few days after another false flag attack was debunked by Turkey after Ukrainian government claimed that the Turkish mosque in Mariupol had been shelled by Russia with 80 civilians inside, including children. This was a failed attempt to drag Turkey into a direct confrontation with Russia as Turkish state media revealed[+] that the Ukrainian government had misled Western reporters and that the Mosque was not only fully intact, it had never been hit by Russian fire. Turns out, even NATO's magic reality distortion field has its limits😊.
Since this is clearly a NATO proxy war[*][+] against Russia, any so-called “independent” report or expert from any NATO state can’t be authority to judge who did it, especially when they already revealed their bias and pro-Ukrainian stance on countless occasions and especially when their reports are full of speculations such as[+] “The most likely9 Russian aircraft to have conducted the strike are multi-role fighters – such as the Su-25, Su-30, or Su-34” or “Amnesty International believes10 that at least a dozen people11 were killed by the strike and likely many more” and when they conducted interviews only with Ukrainian witnesses and not a single ethnic Russian witness – that alone is very suspicious. Apparently, "independent investigation" now means "interviewing only one side and speculating wildly."😊
It seems that Ukrainians did not match their stories as they contradicted each other – some say it was a bomb, other said it was artillery shelling[+], and a witness said it was a missile. Even Amnesty International witnesses contradict themselves and tell lies such as one who was allegedly close to the theatre at the time of the attack and claimed that he saw “two missiles fire from one plane towards the theatre”! Please explain us how two missiles can be fired and then land right bellow?! Anyone who uses their brain-cells knows how missiles are fired from a long distance rather than from immediate vicinity of the target and so can detect a lie there, but the fact that the Amnesty International reports such lies without any fact-checking is very telling. Perhaps their fact-checkers were on a coffee break... for two years straight😊.
The story-telling of the three witnesses is very much indicative that they were used and formulated in way to debunk accusations of the inside job. Photographic evidence from ethnic Russians showed that Azov fighters (a neo-Nazi unit of the Ukrainian Internal Ministry, who controlled the theater) removed all vehicles from the theater’s parking lot one day before the explosion, which suggests the vehicles were removed because they planned to blow up the theater to prevent them from being damaged. Further circumstantial evidence is the fact that they did not care about the victims as there were no rescue attempts allowed as Azov/Ukrainian Army “observers” fired on anyone trying to pull people from the rubble[+]. Why didn't they try to rescue people from under the rubble? "Humanitarian operation," they said. "Don't touch the evidence," they meant😊.
The same scenario was played out in May 2014 in Odessa massacre[»][+] where Ukrainian far-right nationalists (with the Ukrainian police just standing by[»] rather than stopping them and capturing them) trapped and killed 116[+] (officially 48) pro-Russian protesters[+][+][+][»], which proves what they are capable of. Also, civilians that escaped Mariupol through humanitarian corridors have testified[+][+][»][+] that they were held by Azov as human shields in the area, and that Azov fighters detonated parts of the theater as they retreated.
There is plenty proof of Azov militants killing Ukrainian civilians (ethnic Russians or “Russian collaborators”) all the time, such as in another incident is this video[»] from a guy and his wife who while trying to flee Mariupol noticed some killed civilians at a Ukrainian checkpoint and when they attempted to help, the Azov soldiers shot at them (the guy survived but his wife was killed). Another war crime was Ukrainian Azov militants shooting civilians during Mariupol evacuation[»][ꚛ][+][»][+][+][+][+][+][»][»] and blew up an apartment building in Mariupol, killing 200 people, most of them women and children[+][+]. Not to mention all the other instances since 2014 of them killing ethnic Russians and “Russian collaborators” elsewhere[+][+][+][+][+][+][+][+][+][+][+][»][»], including Odesa massacre[»][»][+] in May 2014 where they also, like in Mariupol theater, trapped pro-Russians in a building and then burned them alive.
Even if you don’t trust some of these pieces of evidence, the rest of them are enough to debunk the Kyiv narrative, and if you are still not fully convinced, feel free to investigate[+][+][+][+] this topic further from independent Western sources as well as hear the other side like in any court before making any judgements and punishments or retributions. Just make sure your "independent" Western sources aren't getting their intel from a fortune cookie, or, as it turns out, the Azov Battalion's press office😊.
Bucha massacre
➡ Bucha massacre was debunked here[+][+][+][+][+][+][+][+][+][+][+][+][+][+][»][»][»] – it was reported on 2 April 2022 and blamed on Russia but was a false flag operation[+] staged[»][ꚛ]to derail negotiations by Ukrainian ultranationalists (Azov regiment), orchestrated by SBU12 and the MI6[»] – to enrage and so prevent Zelensky to agree on a peace deal with Russia and to falsify the reason for the rejection of the agreements by making a fuss in the Western media[+].
The Kremlin said[+] the purported evidence of the crimes was fabricated, as part of an effort by the US and its allies to derail the peace talks between Russia and Ukraine. A couple of days earlier, the Zelensky delegation[+][+][»][»] already signed a draft, so NATO and nationalists desperately needed him to pull out from the deal, as they wanted to fight the Russians to take Crimea back (which was not part of the deal). Zelensky used the Bucha incident to justify scrapping a draft truce with Moscow, which British PM Boris Johnson pressured him to do, and declaring military victory over Russians who retreated from the northern regions as part of the deal.
Here's an account[+][+][»][+][+][»][»][»] of a whistle-blower French volunteer Adrien Bocquet who was a witness of Ukrainians staging the whole thing. After he exposed it, they attempted to kill him as he explained[»][»] that and more about faking Bucha plot. Because nothing screams "democracy" like attempting to silence eyewitnesses, right?😊
And a Czech soldier Filip Siman, who at that time illegally served in a foreign army as a mercenary in the Ukrainian volunteer battalion Karpatská Sich admitted[+][+] under oath in a court testimony to be part of the “cleanup operation” in Bucha (and Irpin), where he performed looting and executions: "We were the police, we were the court, we were the firing squad when it came down to it." He stated that he followed the instructions of the commanding officer, and other soldiers also behaved similarly.
Circumstantial evidence of British (MI6) involvement is the fact that Britain blocked[+][+] UN investigation into Bucha massacre – why else block it unless they either did it or know that their proxy Ukraine did it?! Russia denied the accusations and requested an emergency session of the UN Security Council to discuss alleged war crimes committed in Bucha but Britain blocked it. Shutting down public discourse – is that part of our values now? Apparently, the answer is, yes. Turns out, 'transparency' is only a Western value when it suits the narrative. Well... that kind of aligns with the so-called European values, not gonna lie😊. This refusal should be a huge tell for thinking persons. After all, the physical site of the supposed crime is held by Ukraine, not Russia. Russia wants investigations and justice; UK wants media-induced hysteria, condemnation, and escalation. Priorities, you know😊.
Furthermore, the notorious British-Syrian ‘White Helmets’ scam[+][+][+] (incl. staging a fake chemical weapons attack[+]), among their other false flag ops, proves what Britons are capable of. They're practically the Hollywood of humanitarian crises😊.
Circumstantial evidence of Ukrainian involvement is the fact that they hide the forensic findings. To this day, Ukraine provided no forensic findings but only a well-crafted narrative designed to demonize Russia, prolong the war, and increase sanctions against the challenger to Western hegemony, Russia. The process of international forensic investigation is well known and established. Basic medical forensics would answer three key questions: time of death, mechanism of death, and if the bodies had been moved[ꚛ]. (only a dubious report[+] that there is such data without any evidence) to sustain their accusations. One assumes the dog ate their homework, or perhaps the forensics lab was "accidentally" shelled by a rogue reality😊. None of the international organizations that are engaged in confirming the war crimes committed by the Russian army were given forensic data – the UN, the International Criminal Court, the OSCE, Amnesty International, or any of international human rights organizations. Researchers from Human Rights Watch who worked in Bucha after Russian troops withdrew from the area from April 4 to 10 reported[+] evidence of war crimes – just 16 apparently unlawful killings but got no proof who did it, no forensic data, no full list of all of hundreds of victims, just some testimonies from a few locals but no proof that it was actually Russians who killed all of them – it seems to be nothing but a cover-up operation. Russia wants real, unbiased investigations and justice; Ukraine wants media-induced hysteria, condemnation, and escalation. It’s almost as if some people prefer a good story over boring old facts😊. Also, why bother with pesky facts when a good narrative gets you more Javelins?😊No one is denying that Russians did kill some people during their offensive but the point is, they are being blamed for the killings of Ukrainian neo-Nazis who kill all pro-Russian Ukrainians.
Circumstantial evidence of Ukrainian involvement is the fact that they hide the names of the victims[+][+][+]. They claim that 1.137[+] civilians were found dead in Bucha area and the Bucha City Council confirmed the existence of a verified list with the names and details of the deceased but in late April 2022, they published only 53[+][+] names (only because they were searching for relatives to pick up the bodies from the morgue for burial) and 36 anonymous photos[»] but did not provide the full list of actual names as the Russian authorities requested – why are they hiding other names? If the names turn out to be ethnic Russians[+] or known pro-Russians, this would prove Ukrainian guilt[+].
36 anonymous victims killed on Yablunska Street — who are they?
From the provided names and photos, it is hard for outsiders to know whether they were collaborators or not but a couple of killed well-known pro-Russian civilians were identified: one victim was was Oleksandr Rzhavsky[+][+], a pro-Russian member of the Ukrainian Parliament (allegedly killed on 27 March 2022 but there is proof of his recording on 30 March, which Western governments don’t allow[+] us to see along with many other evidence coming from Russian outlets they banned, exposing their lies about “freedom of the press” in the West), and another was ethnic Russian Ilya Navalny, a relative of the Russian politician Alexei Navalny, which punches a hole in their narrative. Because, why would Russians massacre pro-Russians?!
Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov asked[+][+] UN Secretary General Guterres to use his authority to get the full list of victims of Bucha massacre but to this day[+], Ukrainians refuse to give it to the UN or anyone else. This alone is suspicious enough but there is much more factual evidence of Ukrainian guilt. Transparency is apparently a one-way street in Kyiv😊.
Ukrainians killing their own may seem like an outrageous claim to common people until they see all the evidence and their many other similar atrocities in Donbas for many years as well as realize that in towns (like Bucha) near Belarussian and Russian borders, many or most people were ethnic Russians, Russophones and Russophiles (whom naturally Russians would not kill but whom Ukrainian Russophobes would and did kill for 8 years in Eastern Ukraine).
The first responders in Bucha were the same blood-thirsty neo-Nazi types that stop at nothing to achieve their goals, like those who hired Maidan snipers[+][+][+][+][+] in February 2014 and burned people alive in May 2014 in Odesa massacre[»][+][+][»][+], as well as shelled[»] and slaughtered almost 14.000[+][+][+] Ukrainian civilians in Donbas just because they were ethnic Russians. So, how can anyone trust them and know that they were not the ones who committed the Bucha massacre? If they killed civilians (“Russian collaborators” and ethnic Russians) elsewhere[+][+][+][+][+][+][+][+][+][+][+][»][»], then surely they could have done it in Bucha as well. Here[»] is an Ukrainian serviceman proudly boasting about extrajudicial execution of 6 civilians (suspected of collaboration with Russia) in one of Kyiv parks.
Another proof that Ukrainian SBU kills civilians – alleged Russian collaborators extrajudicially is reported even by the pro-Ukrainian British Economist magazine[+]13 and Daily Mail[+] in disgusting articles that instead of condemning such extrajudicial reprisals and assassinations, the publications cheer it but later admitted[+] its “propaganda nonsense about Ukraine and the invented Russian menace”.
Also USAID-funded Ukrainian media outlets reported[+] how the Ukrainian special forces began clearing operation in Bucha from saboteurs and accomplices of Russia and this video[»] shows how people informed them about collaborators and their locations while oddly no one mentions any mass atrocities, as if there were none. So, the main question is, what happened to all those civilians deemed as Russia's collaborators and what did they mean by “clearing”? Could it be that they were searching for them to kill them, or clearing meant arresting them? If they wanted to arrest them, why did they call it “clearing operation”?
No, as British mainstream media Daily Mail reported[+], so-called Russia's “collaborators were being tracked down and slaughtered”, citing an adviser to the interior ministry Anton Gerashchenko saying[+] that “a hunt has been declared on collaborators and their life is not protected by law. Our intelligence services are eliminating them, shooting them like pigs.” – words straight out of a humanitarian playbook, clearly😊. So, there you have it, clear evidence that it was Ukrainians who were killing their fellow compatriots and then blaming it on the Russians, which is why there was a gap of 4 days between Russia withdrawing from Bucha and first reports on a massacre there.
Ukranians who collaborated with the Russians wore white bands around their arms. Gerashchenko posted this video at the massacre scene in Bucha’s children’s summer camp, that was used as a collaborators’ base.
As noted earlier, a Czech soldier Filip Siman, who admitted[+][+] under oath in a court testimony to be part of the “cleanup operation” in Bucha (and Irpin), where he performed looting and executions following the instructions of the commanding officer: "We were the police, we were the court, we were the firing squad when it came down to it." During those few days they tracked down the so-called Russia's collaborators and slaughtered them. However, the official position is that 0 collaborators were found or killed in Bucha. Moreover, on 12 March 2022, Zelensky threatened[»] collaborators and said “they sign their own sentence.” He defines collaborators as even those who “lack the disgust to refuse to talk to invaders”. If you talk to Russians, you are a collaborator!
on 12 March 2022, Zelensky threatened collaborators
The first responders were Ukrainian Special Forces SAFARI and neo-Nazi Azov regiment[+] who were sent into Bucha after the Russian withdrawal to “begin clearing operation from saboteurs and accomplices of Russia”[+][+][+][»] hunting down so-called "Russian collaborators" wearing white armbands – in other words, they massacred the Bucha civilians who were wearing white armbands[ꚛ][ꚛ] and then staged[»][ꚛ] it and conveniently blamed it on the Russians to derail negotiations[+][+].
Proof that they were shooting all those with white (not blue) armbands is also in a video titled “Botsman Boys’ work in Bucha”[»][»][»][»][+] released on 1 April 2014 by the leader of a division of the Azov battalion, neo-Nazi Sergei “Boatsman” Korotkikh[+], in which one Ukrainian soldier asked another "There are guys without blue armbands, can I shoot them?" And the other answered, “F***, yeah!” And here[»] is actual evidence of one of them actually shooting at someone on the street – a shot is heard.
For people using brains, that smoking gun alone is enough evidence proving that it was Ukrainian military that was shooting civilians in Bucha, not merely Russians. There is not a single evidence that Russians were massacring civilians, although they surely did shoot some, such as those who posed threat by rebelling, attacking, having weapons, disobeying by entering designated forbidden zones, by mistake, etc. Russians were rightfully concerned about combatants concealed among the residents and most likely killed some seeming civilians who were in fact saboteurs or paramilitaries or spies.
To break the tension, a quick funny break😊:
Knock, knock. Who's there? Blame. Blame who? Blame Russia. They probably did it anyway.
Another smoking gun is another horrific video[»] from a day before the same guys enter Bucha, shows them Ukrainians killing civilians with white armbands (deemed as Russian collaborators) on the outskirts of Bucha[+] and one civilian lying wounded who should have been at least taken prisoner but was shot on the spot. Further proof of Ukrainian neo-Nazis from the Azov Battalion committing similar atrocities across Ukraine is this video[»] showing them executing hideous torture and killing of a civilian “collaborator” in 2015. There is countless evidence of Azov militants killing Ukrainian civilians[»] which suggests they could have then easily done it in Bucha, too.
NYT map of bodies found in Bucha, roughly 44 bodies
There is no valid evidence that Russians did it, including no circumstantial evidence – Russians never did anything like that anywhere else before or after, Russians had no gains from it, it made no sense to do it to their sympathizers and in the peace negotiation period during which they even retreated from Bucha as a goodwill gesture[+][+][+].
Russians never did anything like that anywhere else before or after, otherwise, Ukrainians would make sure to shout about it from the rooftops to gain more support from the world, as they always do whenever civilians get killed during missile and drone attacks; the only other two cases they exclaimed were in the same region and at the same time: two “mass graves” in nearby village Borodianka[+], one with 3 bodies14 and the other with 6 bodies, strangely discovered more than 20 days after Russians withdrew and in nearby Makarov, village[+] where 132 shot bodies were found but they did not reveal the names of the victims as if hiding their pro-Russian identity, and no one knows what happened to ethnic Russians or Russophone villagers who might be the ones killed by the local forces for being “Russian collaborators”.
Name any other Russian massacres in Ukraine, if you can! You can’t, can you? Isn’t that weird? If Russians are so evil as they are portrayed to be, how come there is only one massacre they allegedly did? The fact that there was only one alleged massacre, indicates that there was actually none and that this was a false flag operation to blame the “evil” Russians so as to get international support to fight against them to ultimately retake Crimea. A true evil empire would have a much better track record of massacres. Amateurs😊.
It made no sense to do it to their sympathizers — victims were wearing white armbands – a sign of friendliness towards the Russian military, as they accepted Russian humanitarian relief – 452 tons[»][+][+»][+»][+][+][+][+] of humanitarian aid were delivered and issued to civilians by Russian servicemen in the settlements of the Kyiv region, including Bucha). One can see from multiple angles[ꚛ] that the massacred civilians in Bucha were carrying emergency food rations distributed by Russian forces before the troops withdrew, which is why these victims were most likely killed by Ukrainian nationalists for "collaborating" with Russia.
Why would Russians kill those to whom they provided food?! Why would an army that delivered 452 tons of humanitarian aid to civilians in Bucha then massacre them? It makes no sense and proves the allegations wrong. Unless their policy was 'feed them first, then send them to heaven to meet their Maker' – it would be a sin to send them off to meet the Boss on an empty stomach, right?😊
Also, it rained[+] after the Russians left, so blood would have been washed away, thus one doesn’t have to be a detective to work out that the fact that it wasn’t, it indicates that at least some people were killed afterwards like this baby and mother[ꚛ] whose hair and clothing would also be messed up if she was really there for many days. Even more weird is that her hands were tied behind her back, so how on Earth was she carrying the baby like that walking down the streets?! Obviously someone placed the baby there! If she was shot and fell down, no way her baby would fall down like that in front of her! Perhaps the laws of physics are also in on the conspiracy?😊
One more blood evidence is another alleged Russian massacre in the Bucha’s summer camp "Promenystyy/Snowdrop"[+], that was used as a collaborators’ base (evidenced by spray-painted “V” outside the camp walls[ꚛ], the same as on their civilian cars[ꚛ][ꚛ] but these could have been also sprayed by Ukrainians so as to use it as a proof that this was a Russian base but Russians never signify their military bases so as not to be targeted) – five men[+] (4 of them not even from Bucha[+]) were found killed[»][»] in the basement but there is a nuance: Ukrainian TV shows[»] bodies with fresh blood flowing from their wounds but Russians left over 4 days earlier (filming on 3 April[»], Russians left on 30 March[»])! Their bodies have not changed color nor swollen up days later. And they have white bands[ꚛ], what identified[»] them as Russian collaborators – Russian troops, while they were in Bucha, required that local friendly residents wear the armbands to identify themselves, as also reported by Reuters[+] and Ukrainian military sources[+] and was the case also in other places like Mariupol[»][»]. Just apply common sense. The fresh blood, the blood color, the body color – all points to a recent execution. These Russian collaborators were killed the day the video was taken, hence the killers must have been Ukrainian nationalists as revenge for being collaborators.
Notice fresh blood flowing from the wound. They were killed just hours, not days ago, else is not possible. This was filmed by EspresoTV on 3 April, so they were killed either on 2 or 3 April.
Moreover, in his 31 March address[»][+»]upon Russian withdrawal the day before, the Bucha mayor Anatoly Fedoruk never mentioned at all that any civilians were lying dead on the streets and was very happy rather than sad (as would be expected by witnessing an alleged massacre).
Also, on 2 April 2022, Ukrainian national police were filmed[»] inspecting the streets of Bucha showing clean streets with no corpses! Oops. The narrative exposed. Turns out, dead bodies are surprisingly camera-shy for a few days😊.
Also, NYT was in Bucha on 2 April 2022 and did not report a massacre; instead, it reported that “The city is being cleared from saboteurs and accomplices of Russian force” by Azov soldiers suggesting that they may be responsible for the killings[+][+].
Furthermore, curiously, the massacre was first reported on 3 April, four days after Russians left and Ukrainians entered – why did they wait 4 long days to expose alleged Russian atrocities when they usually do it the same day?! God is in the details.
And about that mass grave, guess what? It turns out, it was dug by Ukrainian medics on the 10th March 2022, before Russian forces fully occupied Bucha on 12 March 2022, as this video evidence[»] shows where one of them says “Here are our fighters … 33” of them. On that day, they buried 33 bodies and two days later, on the 12th March Ukrainian medics reportedly[»] buried 67 more bodies. No complaints about any Russian massacre or anything like that. Furthermore, the mass grave contains bodies of civilians from around the Kyiv region (not Bucha residents), plus bodies of soldiers and even allegedly some bodies of Russian soldiers[+]. Clearly, these people (and perhaps those found on a street[»]) died as a result of shelling on both sides rather than some deliberate massacre performed by “evil” Russians as the spin doctors wants us to believe.
Here is just one video evidence[»] from 25 march 2022 in Bucha, during Russian occupation of the town, showing civilians hiding from shelling – since Russians held the city, obviously, Ukraine was shooting at the town full of Ukrainian civilians. How many civilians got hit by artillery during all that time and where were they buried? According to Kyiv regime story, 0 people died due to artillery or crossfire and 0 collaborators were found in Bucha. But just hundred meters further in neighboring Irpin, civilians died through shelling[ꚛ], yet allegedly no one in Bucha despite plenty of evidence of the town being shelled[ꚛ]– it makes no sense; it’s pure nonsense, of course. The point is, many civilians died from shelling, not from Russian massacre. The mayor of Bucha said that 280 people were in mass graves but the only big mass grave found was dug by Ukrainians before Russians seized the town fully. The Guardian reported[+] that many civilians from the mass grave were killed by metal darts that are used in artillery or anti-personnel tank shells from Soviet era (both Ukrainians and Russians had them but the British publication only assumed only Russians fired them). This by itself is an admission that many died due to crossfire or artillery rather than by Russian deliberately firing bullets at civilians! In other words, a proof it was not a massacre but people dying from shelling.
She was saying that Russian soldiers identified themselves as liberators, thus it makes no sense that they would massacre the people whom they came to liberate! Her hallucinating story how they killed her husband was debunked here.
This is not to deny that Russians probably did kill some civilians but only those who posed threat or resisted capture. For instance, this video[»] shows how on 4 March 2022, Russians captured some civilian guys, rather than killed them. They could have killed them right away but they did not; they took them as POWs after catching them hiding in a house and resisting because they were identified as previously serving as checkpoint guards with guns[»]. Before the incident, one of them, Ivan Skyba, took a photo serving as a checkpoint guard carrying a gun. So, they were not civilians – wearing civilian clothes doesn’t make you a civilian if you use weapons. During that time on 4 March, Bucha was not fully captured by the Russians (they did it on 10 March), which means that the battle for Bucha was ongoing with constant clashes during which many civilians fought alongside with soldiers, as it is common in wars.
left: 9 POWs captured; right: survivor Ivan Skyba at a checkpoint carrying a gun
Later, seven of those nine guys were found dead, which was the single evidence that Russians killed civilians. However, the fact that they did not kill them right away and that they shot just some and not all of them, it proves it was not their intention to kill them. Perhaps they tried to escape, who knows, but the main point is to blame the Russians for a massacre of hundreds based just on the evidence that a single Russian unit (the 234th Air Assault Regiment) killed seven of them elsewhere and a few others[»] within designated “forbidden zones”[+] is nuts and a clear proof that things are being blown out of proportion for propaganda purposes.
As NYT reported, Russian soldiers were warning[»] the civilians “We won't shoot if you don't move.” This clearly proves they had no intent to “massacre” them and if any of them were shot during that menacing phase, it was because they did move when and where they were not supposed to. This is not a massacre then. Moreover, the burning van in NYT video, it looks like a civilian wanted to throw a Molotov cocktail[»][ꚛ] and was shot.
Bucha is a town on the outskirts of the capital Kyiv with population, prior to the conflict was approximately up to 38.000 residents, and if during war-time hundreds died, it is a tragedy but it is nothing unusual in this type of circumstances, especially not so as to make a Hollywood-style 3D reconstruction to present their cinematic storytelling version[»] of this event immediately after it took place. And for just $19.99, you too can get the Blu-ray😊! Obviously, they were trying very hard to cover up Ukrainian war crimes there and blame it on the Russians to justify the rejection of the Russian-Ukrainian peace deal in Istanbul and to outrage the public to fight on, just like they hired snipers to shoot civilians on Maidan in February 2014 to blame it on pro-Russian government and get the public to revolt and change regime. This was the media explanation for why Ukraine can’t make peace with Russia and must fight on! When the narrative needs a blockbuster, facts are just a minor inconvenience😊.
We also need to address the issue of the status of civilians – civilians who throw Molotov cocktails at the Russians, are they really civilians whom Russians are not allowed to kill in defense? Are people in civilian clothes carrying guns[+][+] or throwing stones at their enemy[»] true “civilians”? Are old ladies who commit terrorist attacks true “civilians” like this one[»]?
Ukrainian government has actively dragged civilians into the war and people have been militarized[+], handed out weapons[»][»][»][»][+] and were trained to shoot[»] and throw Molotov cocktails to attack Russian soldiers, as evidenced by this video[»] around 3 March 2022, which they also did, as evidenced in this video[»]. Residents admit here[+»] to hiding weapons and ammo and say Russians were concerned about "combatants concealed among the residents". Maybe because they have been attacked by 'civilians'? Also, the bulk of civilian casualties in Bucha happened within designated “forbidden zones”[+], which indicates that either they were rebellious or sneaked there with a bad intent, recklessly causing their own demise.
A few other questions to all those who still believe the Ukrainian version: why would Russians massacre people while retreating when the retreat was a goodwill gesture “to increase trust” in peace talks aimed at ending fighting (as reported also on 29 March, before the retreat on 30 March)[+][+][+]; how come Russian didn't massacre people of any other territories from which they retreated if this is how evil they are, and what about the satellite trickery[+]?!
Please, watch all the evidence on the links provided and consider this: why did Ukraine and its Western allies make such a massive effort (including a Hollywood-style 3D reconstruction) to present their cinematic storytelling version[»] of this event immediately after it took place but they never did such a thing for any other alleged Russian war crimes in Ukraine? Think about it. It is very odd and suspicious. The only reasonable conclusion is that they were trying very hard to cover up the fact that Ukraine did it as mounting evidence surfaced proving Ukraine's culpability. Because if it's not a made-for-TV movie, is it even a war crime?😊
And while you are at it, use your critical thinking in watching all the supposed evidence because things are being presented as evidence without any proof of authenticity, such as the alleged Russian soldier calling his mother not from his phone but allegedly from a victim's phone (it's so believable because, you know, Russians are so poor that they can't afford to have their own phones to call their mothers and telling her how he is killing civilians😊 – as if this is what soldiers really do, they casually tell their mothers how evil they are, and mother didn't even object to it! The film presenter[»] doesn't even bother to prove the authenticity of recording – for all we know, it could be one of those Azov killers who made the call pretending to be a Russian soldier (all or most Ukrainians can speak Russian). Accepting the fake claims of a massacre is as bad as or even worse than denying a real one. Apart from the harm caused by the deception, it undermines trust.
Even Ukrainian ally, Defence Minister of South Korea Shin Won-sik expressed[+][+][+] doubts about the Ukrainian version of the events saying that the details have not yet been established as fact. President Zelensky said, “This is genocide,”[+] which means that with this false flag operation, Ukrainians were conducting genocide.
Even if you don’t trust some of these pieces of evidence, the rest of them are enough to debunk the Kyiv narrative, and if you are still not fully convinced, feel free to investigate[+][+][+][+][+][+][+][+][+][+][+][+][+][+][»][»] this topic further from many independent Western sources as well as hear the other side like in any court before making any judgements and punishments or retributions. Just be warned: "independent Western sources" on this topic are rarer than a sincere apology from a NATO strategist😊.
Kramatorsk Train Station bombing
➡ Kramatorsk train station bombing was debunked here[+][+] — on 8 April 2022 (63 killed, including 9 children, and 150+ injured); it was blamed on Russia despite the fact the Tochka-U missile (armed with cluster munitions) responsible for the blast contained a serial number SH91579[+] that was traced back to the Ukrainian army and originated from Ukrainian-controlled territory (the city of Dobropillia). Apparently, Russian missiles come with a "Made in Ukraine" sticker, a return-to-sender label, and the unique ability to fly backwards to Ukrainian territory. Talk about next-level logistics wizardry and missile moonwalk dancing!😊
Kostiantynivka market missile strike
➡ Kostiantynivka marketmissile strike[+](Donetsk region) onthe 6 September 2023 was, as usual, first pinned[+][+][+] on Russia faster than you can say “blame game” until the solid evidence to the contrary emerged of Ukrainians bombing themselves again[*] – like a tragic game of pin-the-tail-on-the-donkey gone wrong😊. The New York Times15 run an investigation and article[+] about this missile strike on a Ukrainian-controlled town that killed 16 civilians and injured 33 others. Western investigative reporters collected and analyzed evidence, including missile fragments, satellite imagery, the direction from which the missile flew in, witness accounts, and social media posts, and attested that it was Ukrainians misfiring a 9M38 missile. Not expecting the allies to doubt him and investigate it, initially, Zelensky condemned the attack, describing[+] it as "The audacity of evil. The brazenness of wickedness. Utter inhumanity." Well, all these descriptions then apply to Ukraine now that we all know that Ukraine killed their own people again and again blamed it on Russia. Talk about a plot twist even Beyoncé16 couldn’t drop on us nor Elon Musk17 couldn’t tweet into existence😊. The reporters also wrote about the coverup of Ukrainian authorities who tried to prevent journalists from accessing the missile debris and impact area in the strike’s immediate aftermath, which furthermore proves they knew it from the start who did it, so Zelensky was caught lying. It may be an accident but it may also be a false flag operation at the time US Secretary of State Blinken was visiting Kyiv to use it to outrage and so compel the US to provide more aid and stop pressuring Kyiv to freeze the conflict18[+]. Whoops, looks like someone’s false flag got caught in the wind!😊
➡ Blowing up their own $20 billion Nord Stream pipelines for no reason in September 2022[+][+][+][+][»], which we all now know by now that they didn't (it was done either by the US with Norway[+][»][+] or Ukraine[+][+][+][+][+]). Going by how absurd the allegation was, it could be topped only by claiming that drunk Russians caused the explosions themselves by tossing lit cigarettes. Because nothing says 'master strategist' like destroying your own biggest leverage. Next, they'll blame Russians for turning off their own central heating in winter😊.
➡ Ukrainian President Zelensky blamed in televised remarks[+] Russians for the missile that hit Poland in November 2022[+], killing two civilians, saying it was a "Russian missile", but Polish[+] and NATO officials[+], as well as Biden[+] revealed soon afterward that it was Ukraine’s air defense gone wild[+]. Kyiv criminal regime fired the rocket against the EU as a false-flag operation apparently thinking[+], “Let’s fling a rocket at Poland and pin it on Putin for some extra NATO goodies!”😊, which is a crime.
Don’t you worry, they found many other problems in Poland to blame it on Russia[+]because why let a good scapegoat go to waste😊! There are conspiracy theories involving Russia from bad weather to missing car keys😊 but we can’t be bothered to cover all these fakes.
➡ Countless other instances with Ukrainian civilian casualties were blamed on Russia until it was later exposed by Western authorities that it was Ukrainians, not Russians, who killed their own civilians – sometimes by accident, or using them as human shields[»][»][+][+][+][+], or as false flag operations to blame Russia so as to gain more support and aid. There are too many such instances to list here, thus we list just a couple of them: care house in Stara Krasnianka[+][»] in July 2022, Dnipro residential building airstrike[+][+][»][+] in January 2023, etc. It's as if 'Russia did it' is the default setting before anyone checks the facts. Must save a lot on investigative journalism😊.
➡ Cruelly beheading a Ukrainian POW[+]– on 12 April 2023,a video“leaked” showing what appears to be a Russian soldier savagely beheading a Ukrainian prisoner of war with a knife. One argument that this may not be true is the fact that there were never any other such incidents reported, quite the opposite with Ukrainian POWs19 telling about being treated well in captivity[»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»], and much evidence[»] how Russians make extra effort to capture rather than kill Ukrainian soldiers, even if by it they risk their lives[»][»]. It could be that Ukrainians did it to their own deserter or ‘SZCH-schnik’ (short for the Ukrainian term for ‘unauthorized abandonment of a unit’) as there is much evidence on AFU20 commanders killing[»] their disobeying soldiers or assigning troops to punish deserters[+]by killingkilling[»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][+][+][+][+][»][»][»] them, so it is very likely that as a false flag operation[+], they staged killing a deserter as if Russians killed him in a cruel way (decapitating) as either a warning to all Ukrainians not to surrender (because they would otherwise be killed by evil Russians) or as anti-Russian propaganda to get more support from abroad against such “evil” Russians.Ukraine is faced with a huge problem of its soldiers either deserting their posts (over 100.000[»][»][+] by April 2024), refusing to fight, or surrendering to Russians[+], which is why they resort to desperate, evil measures. · Because nothing motivates your troops not to surrender like a cleverly staged snuff film like that. Hollywood scriptwriters are taking notes😊.
➡ The Kakhovka Dam Destruction[+]on 6 June 2023 –without any investigation, any evidence, or valid motive(s), just hours after it happened, Western and Ukrainian authorities went into a full PR campaign blaming Russia for blowing up its own dam and Hydroelectric Power Plant. Update: in June 2025, Ukrainian soldier confessed[»] to blowing up the Kakhovka dam in a podcast with a Ukrainian podcaster. Ukraine, naturally, had plenty of motives and benefits to blow it up as the dam was in Russian hands, most of the damages occurred on the eastern bank of the river which is under Russian control and where Russians built their defense fortifications that got flooded, the destruction of the dam was going cause shortages of water for agriculture in Russian-controlled southern Ukraine and Crimea, a huge loss of water in the Kakhovka Reservoir may threaten the water supply to the Russian-controlled Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, and the level of the water reservoir to fall to the point at which Ukrainian forces may be able to easily cross over to the NPP and attack it.
But the main motive was most likely that Ukraine needed a catastrophic event blamed on Russia to divert the world's attention from the Ukrainian hugely embarrassing, catastrophic defeat in what was supposed to be the beginning of a glorious counteroffensive – in the first couple of days in the battle on Vremevka salient (4-6 June 2023), Ukraine's armed forces suffered 3.715 casualties, losing also 52 tanks, 341 other (armored) vehicles, 53 drones, 5 planes, 2 helicopters, 48 artillery systems[+], etc. and they had nothing to show for it to their Western sponsors.
Apart from all that, by own admission[+], Ukrainian commanders already considered blowing it up and were, in fact[+][+][+][+][+], bombing it with missiles and shells before, and let's not forget that they already committed another ecocide by blowing up the Nord Stream pipelines as the CIA and Germans reported[+][+][+][+][+][+], which proves they have no qualms about causing environmental catastrophes.
Above all, all Ukrainian arguments (Russians were allegedly "in a panic" to slow down Ukraine's planned counteroffensive[+][+] – no validity for that justification given that Russia had no reason to panic since it repelled all of Ukraine’s attempts to launch its counteroffensive[+] and was winning as Ukraine was losing and surely in panic and desperation) for “Russia did it” narrative collapse when confronted with one simple detail that “smart” Ukrainian accusers and saboteurs overlooked: if Russians had any motive or benefit to blow up their HPP on their own territory, flooding their own positions, they didn't have to blow the dam up as they could just open the gates rather than destroy their precious infrastructure that they would surely need in the future.
Also, the mere fact that it would take "at least 5 years and $1 billion"[+] to rebuild it plus $476 million[+] in total damages from flooding in Russian-controlled areas, not to mention all the costly damage on Russian area’s agriculture and ecosystem[+], surely tells anyone with brain cells that Russians couldn't have inflicted $1,5 billion cost upon themselves when there were other more cost-effective means to achieve gains (if there were any at all) from this destruction.
On top of all that, the fact that, unlike Russia[+][+][+][+], Kyiv dismissed a proposal[+][+][+] for an international UN commission to investigate the bombing of the Kakhovka hydroelectric power plant's dam, clearly indicates Kyiv's fear of the result of the investigation because why else reject it?! More facts:[+][+]
So, to summarize: Russia blew up their own dam, on their own land, flooding their own defenses, and draining their own water supply, for no discernible gain, despite easier alternatives, and then graciously offered to help investigate the colossal damage they supposedly caused. Makes perfect sense... in a parallel universe where strategic thinking is for amateurs😊.
See how the Western hypocrites among the war reporters justify[+] Ukraine blowing up another dam – when Ukraine does it, it a tactically sensible maneuver and no longer causing an “environmental disaster” but when Russia allegedly does it, it is evil.
➡ Furthermore, whenever NATO states don't agree, again they ridiculously blame Russia for attempting to undermine Western unity[+]. Is there anything that’s not Russia’s fault? Russians have been constantly blamed for trying to break the coalition[»] whenever NATO officials disagree among themselves21[+]. That’s right, they are usually always united unless Russians interfere. Tell that to the marines22. 1. Turns out, Russia's superpower isn't hypersonic missiles, it's their uncanny ability to cause internal disagreements in distant alliances just by existing😊. It sounds as if 'Western unity' is held together with sticky tape and the constant threat of a Russian boogeyman under the bed😊.
➡ Russia was also blamed[+] for the feud between Kyiv and Warsaw in the summer of 2023, as usual not providing any evidence whatsoever. Right, it was all Russia's fault that Polish President Andrzej Duda compared[»] Ukraine to a drowning man who will take down those who are trying to help him, that Warsaw extended the embargo on Ukrainian grain supplies acting in the interests of Polish farmers[+], and that Poland no longer supplies new weapons to Ukraine[+][+]. And surely, it was all Russia's fault that Ukraine threatened to sue Poland over its continued ban on Ukrainian grain[+].
Wow, how mighty Russia is then to be able to pull all that off despite having no relationship with both countries! Russia somehow managed, even if only for a short while, to put the close allies at odds with each other, drive a wedge between them, without doing anything at all – without holding any talks whatsoever with their authorities, without making any threats or coercion, without sending any letters or using any intermediaries. It must be some woo-woo then. One must admire their supernatural abilities. We do not know anyone else capable of that. Ukraine and NATO have tried rally hard to alienate or antagonize great Russia's allies like China, India, Belarus, and Kazakhstan but they only drew them closer to Russia. Oddly, Russia was blamed for it only after the feud was sorted out, obviously for no other reason than to point out how “Russia failed” at its attempt to drive them apart! It is rather pathetic. They must invent Russian failures as there are obviously no real failures to brag about.
Perhaps Russia is now employing invisible telepathic agents, or maybe their sheer 'evil' emanates a disagreement-inducing aura. Either way, it's a testament to their unmatched powers of blame magnet😊.
➡ Russia was also blamed[+] for the failure of the Ukrainian summer 2023 counteroffensive – this one might be true, though, because, you know, Ukrainians are so holy that they could never be blamed for anything – Kyiv has never took any responsibility for anything they did, claiming to be holy heroes and the Western/NATO authorities and media never blamed them for anything either. It seems even the laws of physics bend when it comes to Ukrainian military setbacks. Must be that 'unprovoked' quantum entanglement😊. It's truly a miracle. Ukrainians are the only military in history whose strategic failures can be blamed entirely on the enemy😊.
➡ It is also Russia's fault allegedly that reports about Swedes burning Qur’an come out. Because, you know, such instances should not be reported. As the UK's media outlet Guardian reported[+][+], “The Swedish authorities have accused Russia of trying to influence how Qur’an burnings are viewed around the world through disinformation campaigns written in Arabic. It is believed to be part of an attempt to disrupt Sweden’s NATO membership process, which was waiting for approval by Turkey and Hungary.” So, according to the Western spin doctors23, the problem is not at all that Swedes keep publicly burning Qur’an but the problem is how it is perceived and that Russia exposes it! So, instead of condemning the Swedes, they condemn the Russians – what does that say about the West?! So, in essence, the problem isn't the act of setting sacred texts on fire, but the audacity of someone reporting about it. Russia: the ultimate villain, even when just reporting the news😊. At this point, is there anything that’s not Russia's fault? It's a wonder they didn't blame it on global warming, too😊.
➡ in July 2023, the Transfiguration Cathedral in Odessa was not struck by a Russian strike[+], but Ukrainian AD missile. Russia has no incentive or gain from destroying churches while Ukraine, run by church-despising Jews, is notorious for locking up churches, confiscating them[+][+][»], burning them[»][»], and demolishing them[»][»][»] but forget about all that when we desperately need our weekly installment of "Russia Did It" blockbuster series. Tune in next week for more thrilling blame games!😊
➡ When many dead dolphins washed ashore in the Black Sea in August 2023[+], Ukrainian officials blamed – surprise, surprise, hold onto your flippers! – Russia for ecocide disregarding the fact that it was Ukraine that placed many sea mines and was using sea drones that got blown up and caused fuel leaks in attacked Russian ships polluting the sea and so endangering the dolphins. More than 6.000 pieces of explosive devices were found[+] at the bottom of the Black Sea near Sevastopol, clearly placed by Ukrainians there, regardless of the danger for the marine life. So, Ukraine and NATO basically threw Flipper under the bus and pointed at Russia. Classic😊!Besides, their inconsistency in narratives is indicative of falsehood, as they were first claiming[+][+] that Russia trains dolphins to defend its fleet from Ukraine attacks, to serve as spies, and as part of a defensive system patrolling the waters around Russian harbors (because who doesn’t want a dolphin 007, right?😊) – why would then Russians endanger their assets or get them killed? If Ukraine and NATO view dolphins as serving the Russian navy, then it makes more sense that it was them who killed them. So, Ukraine and NATO had the motive, Russians didn't. Because nothing screams "eco-warrior" like blaming your mines and drone fuel leaks on Flipper's loyalty to the Kremlin😊.
➡ Another wisecrack occurred in October 2023, soon after the war in Israel started, when Zelensky blamed[+] Russia for triggering war in Middle East to ‘undermine world unity’! He is too smart for me because, what does that even mean? And when was the world ever united anyway? Hilarious. Often, it is unclear if Zelensky is doing a public speech or a stand-up comedy😊. We are not sure if we should laugh at this or admire his mind-boggling reasoning. Either case, this bloke, he never disappoints, does he? Always doing just as expected from a stand-up guy like him but foolishly and naively playing into his enemy’s hands with all this constant “Russia did it” narrative that he brought to such a ridiculous level that even if Russia did it, most people would doubt and just laugh it off. When all this is over, we should award him with an Oscar or something because he is really doing his best under the circumstances in his capacity as tragicomedian and unintentionally making us laugh at times. Clown School[ꚛ] for Tragicomedy: find a way to tie any calamity to Russia to make people laugh at you😊.
➡ January 2025 Gas Transit Drama: Zelensky pulls the plug, Russia gets the blame! Zelensky halted gas transit through Ukraine, but NATO bigwigs tried to spin it as Russia’s fault. As blame-Russia reflex kicked in, EU foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas embarrassed herself with an infantile post[+] blaming Russia for “weaponizing gas” like a kid blaming a ghost for a blackout. Newsflash, Kaja: Zelensky yanked the gas cord to spank Slovakia and Transnistria for cozying up to Russia, not Putin! His cranky move to keep Europe from bankrolling Russia’s war left EU spin doctors scrambling to pin it on Putin’s shadow again. It’s like blaming the chef for a soufflé falling flat in a power outage when a grumpy waiter spitefully yanked the power cord mid-bake😊. Classic misdirection!
Also, Polish Foreign Minister Sikorski (who also thanked[+] the US for blowing up the Nord Stream gas pipeline) praised[+] Ukraine for cutting Russian oil and gas to Europe ridiculously claiming that means a victory.
➡ In May 2025, the EU and UK unveiled their latest "Russia Did It!" blockbuster series with a plot twist: no more boring Russian villains🥱. Hurrah! In this new exciting season, we’ve got brave Ukrainian heroes who, to no fault of their own, were being coerced over and over again to do hideous crimes on behalf of evil Russia. This alleged "Moscow-engineered sabotage campaign in Europe” surely has nothing to do with the EU trying to sabotage the peace talks between Ukraine and Russia with false flag operations because this would be so unlike European warmongers! And the timing is a mere coincidence, of course. · The sheer commitment to this narrative deserves a Pulitzer for 'Fiction That's Almost Too Ridiculous to Be Fiction'😊.
▶ In the 1st installment of the new season, the plot is taking place in wonderful Warsaw, Poland last year when evil Russia twisted the arm of 3 brave Ukrainians to do what they never in their wildest dream would ever do: On 11 May 2025, Poland unveiled[+] its latest "Russia Did It!" blockbuster: two Ukrainian citizens charged with terrorism and espionage for setting fire to Warsaw's biggest shopping mall in May 2024, allegedly on behalf of Moscow. Because, obviously, nothing screams "Russian patriotic duty" quite like Ukrainian refugees burning down a mall in a country that mistreats them. Makes perfect sense... if your brain cells are on vacation in the Bahamas😊. Missing from the press conference? Journalists asking for proof of Kremlin ties. Who needs facts when you have a perfectly convenient narrative, right? It's not like Ukraine and Russia are, you know, at war or anything, making Ukrainians totally reliable Russian proxies. Russia, ever the spoilsport, called the accusations "baseless" and just another symptom of Polish "Russophobia."
▶ "Russia Did It!" blockbuster series continues with 2nd episode of the new season this month with plot taking place in wonderful Germany: On 14 May 2025,Germany arrested three Ukrainians for sabotage attacks and instantly blamed Russia[+][+]! Ukrainian nationals have been arrested on suspicion of plotting parcel bomb attacks in Germany allegedly “on behalf of the Russian state, according to prosecutors, reviving fears about an alleged Moscow-engineered sabotage campaign in Europe”. The evidence for Russian involvement? Crickets. Because who needs it when nothing makes more sense than Ukrainians doing the Russian bidding while the two countries are at war with each other, right?😊 Next up: Germany blames Russia for their notoriously punctual trains running five minutes late😊.
▶ Time for the 3rd episode of this new season of "Russia Did It!" blockbuster series, which takes us to wonderful London and to no other than three Prime Minister Starmer's[+][+] residences that are all up in flames. By this point, frankly, the only surprise would be if it wasn't Russia. In keeping with the theme of this season, the arsonists in all these three cases are different Ukrainian “models” acting on behalf of Russia[+], obviously. Yes, because when you need to start a fire, you call a wannabe supermodel. Evil Putin twisted their arms, so no one should blame them as they are just poor victims in all of this, of course. Perhaps we should be starting a petition to get these Ukrainian models a humanitarian award for 'Most Unlikely Arsonists Under Duress'? The bravery of these 'models' truly knows no bounds; a lifetime achievement award in 'unwitting' sabotage seems appropriate. We hear Hollywood's already lining up the bids for their inevitable 'tragic figures forced into villainy' biopic. They'll be selling their victim-chic fashion line at the next Davos summit, no doubt😊.
There are so many other episodes of this infantile blame-game since Russian SMO kicked off that they’re frankly too ridiculous to list as they are already debunked[+][+] or ridiculed[+»]even by the West. It’s like a bad sitcom where Russia’s the villain in every episode and we’re not here to waste your time with reruns!😊
Discounting their own judicial systems and the legal principle of the presumption of innocence[+], Western nations skip the whole legal investigations and evidence thing when it comes to war crimes as they pronounce guilt based on mere political motives: Russia’s guilty because… well, politics! Case closed. What happened to the fair trial and “innocent until proven guilty”? The burden of proof is on the accusers who must present compelling evidence but in the Western rules-based order[»], motto is: “Accuse Russia first, evidence… meh, who needs it?” Case solved faster than you can coin an online whodunit poll or trend a #BlameRussia tweet😊.
“Russia did it” from 2014-2021
Ever since 2014, the “Russia did it” narrative became a go-to for everything that the Western ruling elite has deemed as useful to defame Putin[+] or Russia as well as to shift the blame or avoid being blamed for something – from various poisonings and killings to elections meddling and all kinds of disinformation. Here are some of the wildest conspiracy theories that flopped harder than a bad stand-up routine😊:
➡ in May 2014, after pro-Russian protesters in Odesa were tragically burned to death[+][+][»] by a pro-Western mob, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko boldly accused Moscow of planting gas canisters in the building to increase the number of casualties! Zero proof, maximum drama! Right, Kremlin snuck gas canisters into the building to up the body count because sure, Russia’s got nothing better to do than exterminating its supporters in Ukraine for zero gain. Was Poroshenko just tossing darts at a ‘Blame Russia’ board (his favorite pastime besides making fascist threats[»][»]), or did he just binge too many spy thrillers?😊
➡ Vrbětice ammunition warehouse explosions[+] in the Zlín District of the Czech Republic on 16 October and 3 December 2014, which killed two, were pinned on Russia’s secret agents, supposedly to disrupt Ukraine’s weapons supply. The very same guys were later blamed for starring in the 2018 Skripal poisoning saga in the UK, also debunked. These globetrotting GRU super-villains must be the busiest spies in the hood, moonlighting as both bombers and poisoners – talk about multitasking😊! Investigations were conducted by biased, anti-Russian investigators from NATO countries, so no wonder they pinned it on their perceived enemy Russia.
But despite all the condemnation and media frenzy, in April 2021, then-Czech President Miloš Zeman dared suggest[+] it might’ve been an accidental boom from mishandled explosives pointing to no evidence to accuse Russia, but NATO suits orchestrated protests against him and cried in sync “Russia’s servant!” even though he was clearly[+] pro-Ukrainian. Curiously, all the warehouse staff were told[+] to take day off right before the kaboom – almost like someone knew the fireworks were coming! Russia, the ultimate scapegoat, or just a bad day at the ammo dump?😊
➡ the Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 crash[+][+][+] on 17 July 2014, a passenger flight from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur was shot down while flying over eastern Ukraine, killing all 283 passengers and 15 crew on board – Russia was blamed without any valid evidence or motive. Why would Russia shoot down the Malaysian civilian plane? Did they think it was a rogue piñata full of sanctions?😊 Russia had no gains from it while Ukraine and NATO gained from blaming Russia and creating mass Russophobia[+] and support for Ukraine. False flag operations[+] are a CIA and NATO common practice, which they carry out also with allies and plenty evidence[+] points in that direction. BUSTED! Ukraine Caught[»][»] Trying to 'Frame Russia' for Shooting Down Malaysia Flight MH17! On 31 January 2024, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) rejected Ukraine’s claims against Russia in the MH17 case but the NATO and Kyiv leaders refuse to accept the ruling, undermining the international law as they pursue it further with Western-dominated International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Council, which has no judiciary powers over the case[+]. The fact that the council refused the Russia’s proposal for “a full, thorough and independent international investigation into the crash of flight MH17, as required by UN Security Council Resolution 2166 and the ICAO Dispute Resolution Rules,” speaks volumes. Moreover, a 2019 documentary[»] from Max van der Werff, the leading independent investigator of the crash has revealed breakthrough evidence of tampering and forging of prosecution materials; suppression of Ukrainian Air Force radar tapes; and lying by the Dutch, Ukrainian, US and Australian governments. This all proves a major coverup. Meet the British intelligence-linked firm that warped MH17 news coverage[+]. Also, a secret Malaysian military operation took custody of the MH17 black boxes on 22 July 2014, preventing the US and Ukraine from seizing them. Their conclusion is that the Russian rebels did not shoot the plane down. Nevertheless, the Western public still think Russia did it because Western media has not corrected its initial claims blaming Russia. The Dutch Safety Board (DSB) and a Dutch-led joint investigation team (JIT) concluded in 2016 that the plane was shot down by ethnic Russian separatists using a missile supplied by Russia but the United Nations’ International Court of Justice (ICJ) in Hague refused[+][+][+][»] to find Russia guilty of downing Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 as Ukraine filed a case for Russia to pay compensation to the victims. A NATO country, the Dutch government, eager to blame Russia, spent or wasted $180 million[+] to pin the blame on Russia – lesson: whoever digs a pit will fall into it. So, despite mountains of contradictory evidence, international court rulings, and even accusations of tampering, if the TV says Russia did it, then Russia did it. Who are we to question the magic of a $180 million narrative?😊
➡ Alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 US presidential election[+][+], a.k.a. Russiagate, which took seven long years and millions of taxpayer money for the US public to finally find out that, contrary to prior sham FBI investigation (with no verified intelligence) and phony Mueller’s investigation[+][+], it was indeed all a hoax and unethical conduct of Hilary Clinton, her campaign team, and their allies (to tie presidential candidate Trump to Russia), as authorized Durham[+] special counsel investigation legal teams revealed in May 2023[+]. In plain words, to help Hillary win the election, as approved by Hillary[+][+][+], the US high authorities and their lackeys[+] in the mass media have conspired to lie to the public about Trump’s ties to Russia and blame[+] Russia for meddling in the election. Hillary’s team tried to cook up a Russian conspiracy tastier than borscht to help her win but it turned out to be a half-baked lie😊! In November 2022, shameless CNN went as far in their propaganda as to claim[+] that Russian oligarch (and Wagner leader) Yevgeny Prigozhin admitted to US election interference although he was talking about interference in the context of the current SMO and he had no post in the Russian government – the article was clearly directed at those who have no brain cells to read between the lines and are easily swayed by bombastic headlines like that. Russia did gain from Hillary’s loss because if she had won as the war profiteers from the US military industry and Ukrainian oligarchs (top sponsors of the Clinton Foundation) wanted her to win, she would have given the green light for the US or NATO proxy war[*][+] against Russia to escalate already in 2017 when Russia was in a weaker position both economically and militarily. The hoax flopped like a bad spy movie, but it still managed to paint Russia as the bad guy in the eyes of folks who don’t read past the credits. If the Washington authorities could have pulled such a hoax on its people to make an enemy out of Russia and blame everything on Russian disinformation, imagine how many other ones they have also done, including about the US proxy war in Ukraine! It’s like the US has a “Blame Russia” button they mash every time they need a villain for their blockbuster narrative😊. Watch here[»] how US Senators used that lie in 2017 to push for sanctions against Russia, claiming that this was Russia’s attack on the US!
But the hypocritical US officials interfere in Russian elections all the time and have made many attempts at regime change through funding NGOs and other entities as well as backing US puppets such as traitor Navalny[+][+][»][»][+][»][ꚛ][+] and spies-posing-as-journalists to stage US-backed protests in 2011-2013[+], 2017/2018[+], 2019[+], 2021[+](which then the US condemned and propagated as Putin being a dictator cracking down on opposition). And they don’t even hide it. For instance, they bragged and even made a movie[+][»]about how they facilitated a US-controlled corrupt player[+] Boris Yeltsin to get re-elected in 1996[+][+][+][+][+]. So, 'Russian meddling' is bad, but 'democratic facilitation' of a corrupt alcoholic is just good foreign policy. Got it😊. Oh, the irony’s thicker than a Russian novel! Back in 1996, the Clinton crew played fairy godmother to Boris Yeltsin, waving their magic wand (and some sweet IMF cash) to keep him in the Kremlin. Fast-forward 20 years, and Hillary, now the star of her own show, was fuming like a kettle on boil, claiming Russia’s meddling cost her the 2016 crown. Talk about curses coming home to roost like a flock of cosmic chickens! Dick Morris, Bill’s old political wizard, chuckled in 2016, calling Putin’s alleged antics “karmic payback”[+] for the Yeltsin boost. And while the Mueller Report (2019) gave “Russiagate” a bit of a side-eye, the whole sowing-and-reaping sitcom was pure poetic justice – worthy of a laugh track😊!
Sheer resemblance of the two is an eerie reminder that karma is you know what😊
“Russian interference” is blamed[+][+][+][+] whenever the Western ruling elites do not get their guys elected abroad or whenever there is some malfunction in their system such as cyber-attacks or mass protests on issues of migration and coronavirus restrictions. Thereby is Russian interference portrayed as immoral despite the fact that there is much more Western interference[»][»][+][+][+]across Eastern Europe and the whole globe, which is hypocritically presented as moral and just. It is always possible that Russia protects its interests abroad by indeed interfering in some processes that are hostile to Russia but it must be highlighted that none of those allegations were backed by any evidence whatsoever – all just blatant defamation, which runs rampant within NATO countries in a climate of impunity, whose frequent bombing other countries goes unpunished. Since the US and its allies among NATO states are notorious for not just interference but outright regime changes and military insurgences, not to mention all the bribing of foreign politicians to allow the US to exploit their natural resources, they are the last who have the right to condemn Russia for interference. And the amount of Western interference on all levels of government and society in Ukraine is outrageous! They were concerned by Russian interference in Ukraine only because they wanted to interfere and rule there. But what right do Anglo-Saxons have to rule or interfere in the politics of Eastern Slavs24?! It’s like a Brit trying to dictate how to make proper borscht!😊
Watch here[»][»] how Russia admits to interfering in US elections and vows to do it again! You have to love Russian sense of humor😊!
➡ US Russophobes blamed Russia for a mysterious ailment they named “Havana syndrome”[+] whereby since 2016, hundreds of US and Canada personnel in Cuba were allegedly sickened (from ringing in the ears to cognitive dysfunction) by clandestine Russian wielding energy waves used as a weapon. But, as reported by MSM[+][+][+] in March 2023, an intelligence report[+] shattered that long-disputed theory. Nevertheless, Russophobes couldn't let it go, so a year later in April 2023, they run the Russia hoax at full power again, claiming[»][»] Russia has acoustic weapons and attacks US officers. If you believe that, Russia’s then basically the almighty DJ of geopolitics, spinning tracks of chaos😊, and the US is anxious. And then, next day, White House spokeswoman Karine Jean-Pierre debunked[»] it again by stating that the American intelligence community has concluded that Russia is not involved in the "Havana syndrome" cases. This was confirmed in 2023 and reconfirmed in 2024 but Russophobic hawks keen to blame Russia for everything that goes bad by them disregard all that and in their cognitive dysfunction are not capable to consider why would Russia use that “acoustic weapon” in Cuba but not anywhere else, like Ukraine?! If Russia’s got a sonic gun, why’s it only vibing in Havana of all places? It seems every unexplained headache in diplomatic circles is just Putin remotely adjusting his bass speakers😊.
➡ Alleged Russian poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal in Salisbury, England on 4 March 2018 – to this day, even with charges being made, no one is convicted for the poisoning and Britain had provided no proof of Russia's or anyone's guilt, despite colossal efforts to blame it on Russian government so as to have justification to place sanctions on Russia to weaken it. The Brits were like, “Russia’s out here spritzing nerve agents like it’s cheap cologne!”😊 Russia has officially declared the poisoning to be a fabrication and a "grotesque provocation rudely staged by the British and US intelligence agencies" to undermine the country. One has to wonder, with all the hysteria in the mass media, why were Brits so concerned about those two Russian citizens being poisoned (who survived), when they are usually they are usually like, “Russians getting hurt? Meh, pass the tea.”😊 Perhaps because Skripals were British assets, spies or something? Or, they took advantage of any such event to publicly vilify Russia? Brits alleged (without any valid evidence) that both the victims and suspects were Russian spies, which makes it then more logical that British MI6 was playing 4D chess, poisoning their own assets to frame Russia – like a spy novel with a terrible plot twist – they could easily plant novichok poison in suspects’ hotel room. It is rather curious that alleged professional killers (the very same guys who in 2014 were also accused of Vrbětice ammunition warehouse explosions[+] in the Czech Republic, which was also disputed by then Czech President Zeman) would amateurishly use Russian produced novichok poison that could be easily used as evidence of Russia's fault and also, without managing to kill the victims! These “pros” botched the job so bad, it’s like they got their spy training from a discount espionage academy😊. The whole charade smells like a false flag operation by MI6 who had interest in killing Russian spies and resources to orchestrate the whole “Russia did it” ploy.
Despite all the efforts to blame it on Russia, the precise source of the nerve agent used to poison them has not been verified[+][+] but Russophobic British mainstream media pointed fingers at Russians anyway. However, independent British toxicologists said[+]there is no evidence that a Russian-made Novichok was used; and that, instead, a British or US-made Novichok was as likely to have been the killer weapon.
Also, no one even bothered what would Russian state gain from poisoning them! What would be the motive for Russia to kill them? What did Skripals do to Russia to deserve a spritz of nerve agent? Were they stealing Putin’s secret borscht recipe?😊 They were certainly much more insignificant than many other anti-Russians or Ukrainians who are still alive and kicking – if Russia poisons its enemies, how come it did not poison all or many other ones, too, like anti-Putin campaigners and Western puppets such as oligarch Mikhail Khodorkovsky, who also lives in England, and chess player Garry Kasparov living in New York? Or many opposition leaders who live in Russia? If Russia’s in the poisoning business, they’re slacking – Khodorkovsky’s still out there sipping tea, not novichok😊! Also, who needs novichok, when Putin can just weaponize all these other less traceable staff (from Jedi mind tricks[+], laughter[+] and weather[+] to squids[+], cockroaches[+], dolphins[+], and puppies[+]), right?!
Police have also been unable to account for how the adapted perfume bottle the novichok was held in came to be at the property of Skripals. During investigation, Russia was "ready to cooperate" and demanded access to the samples of the nerve-agent which was used to poison Skripal but the request was rejected by the British government – one has to wonder why. The procedure stipulated by the Chemical Weapons Convention should be followed whereunder Russia was entitled to have access to the substance in question and 10 days to respond. Also, London refused to provide Russia with the civilian suspects' fingerprints, passport numbers, visa numbers, or any extra data. So, why did Brits violate the law and withheld the alleged evidence? Maybe because it’s as real as a unicorn’s Instagram account?😊The evidence was shakier than a selfie stick in a hurricane!😊Court hearings revealed that police “evidence” was a tangle of inconsistencies, contradictions, fabrications, stonewalling, and lies, which is proof enough that the British Government narrative of the Russian Novichok attack has collapsed.
So, the grand theory relies on Russian spies being both masterminds of chemical weapons and utter amateurs at actually killing people, all while leaving behind perfectly traceable evidence like they’re auditioning for the world’s sloppiest spy flick😊. The whole case fell apart faster than a cheap spy gadget in a B-movie😊. Sounds like a conspiracy so absurd it could’ve been cooked up by a James Bond parodist for a blockbuster called “Novichok Never Dies” featuring Nerve Agent 007, where the laughs come from everyone falling for one bizarre tabloid headline after another mistaking a ludicrous spy farce for prime-time truth when it was really a sitcom gone rogue😊.
Even someone like Ricky Gervais seemed to have found this travesty too farcical to roast, and Mr. Bean was left gobsmacked, outclassed by the media’s bonkers script, his tripping over his own perfume bottle with a teddy bear in tow got sidelined by their nutty spy saga. With all the media frenzy, the public was so hooked on this secret agent thriller that even an alien invasion wouldn’t have stolen the spotlight😊!
➡ Alleged Russian disinformation in the 2020 US presidential electionregarding Hunter Biden's laptop[+] turned out to be CIA disinformation – Hunter’s laptop, packed with juicy corruption details[+] , was called Russian disinformation by 51 corrupt CIA officials at the behest of Biden’s campaign manager (later Secretary of State) Blinken.
Hunter’s laptop revealed corruption on then-Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden with documents revealing IRS tax crimes and an e-mail[+] suggesting his son Hunter had introduced his Ukrainian business partner to him, which would be considered illegal foreign interference in the presidential election and Biden would lose to Trump but as per request of Biden's then-campaign manager, later-US Secretary of State Blinken, 51 CIA officials lied then about it being just another Russian ploy to enable Biden to stay in the race and win the election.
In April 2023, this hoax, too, was exposed[+][+][+][»], once again debunking yet another “Russia did it” narrative and lies of the highest authorities in Washington establishment nexus – these are the people Americans trust about the war against Russia in Ukraine! Had the 51 fraudsters not spun this “Russia did it” yarn, Trump might’ve won the 2020 reelection, and the war in Ukraine might had been prevented to escalate and hundreds of thousands of people would not have died. The CIA starred in its own political thriller that could have been called “Laptopgate: The Great Russian Red Herring. It’s like the CIA tried to frame Putin for Hunter’s bad email habits! ”😊
➡ On 8 February 2022 (just two weeks before Russia started its SMO[+]in Ukraine), the US falsely blamed a later-proved-innocent 15-year-old CHILD, Russian ice skating champion Kamila Valieva for doping at the 2022 Beijing Olympics but curiously only after she dazzled the world by landing a historic, jaw-dropping quadruple jump, snagged gold for Russia, and left the US team sulking in second place! The green-eyed US couldn’t stomach Russian CHILD’S stellar performance and losing to Russia, especially while gearing up for a proxy war, so they cooked up a scandal spicier than a bowl of borscht – they attacked a CHILD to deprive her of her well-deserved gold medal!!! Because nothing says 'fair play' like targeting a KID to reclaim a medal. Talk about sour grapes and child abuse – so the story went, Russia’s doping their teens to stick it to the US team😊! The timing was fishier than the Volga River, with zero proof, and a whole lot of Olympic shade! It's as if the US thought, 'If we can't beat her on the ice, let's beat her reputation.' The foul play by the US sour losers was evident in the fact that the controversial doping test was done a couple of months earlier (25.12.2021) and only surfaced after the US lost the gold medal to Russia and bruised American egos. Eager to rewrite the history in the making, the unsportsmanlike US team furthermore played dirty, ensuring Russia’s team, including the first female ice skater to ever land a quadruple jump, never got their medals, despite Valieva being cleared of any wrongdoing[+] (she bore “no fault or negligence” for it; btw, she also nailed quads on couple other occasions[+][+] proving she didn't need a magic potion to do it), as the medal ceremony was shelved indefinitely under very fishy circumstances, leaving Russia painted as villains in the public’s mind for no valid reason, just like with every other false accusation. Because when in doubt, blame the Russians – even if they're CHILDREN. We can’t emphasize enough how low the US fell by playing every dirty trick and moving heaven and earth to assassinate a character of an innocent Russian CHILD just to be presented as winners and Russians as losers and villains – a CHILD! In the grand theater of sportsmanship, the US chose to be the villain in a child's story. Bravo.
So, by late February 2022, with this scandal and all other previous “Russia Did it” narratives, the Western public was primed to pin just about anything on Russia faster than you can tweet #BlameRussia, including the so-called “unprovoked, illegal, evil invasion” that month.
➡ Russia abducted Ukrainian children but there is nuance – many of them have been found in Germany[+]! So, who’s the real kidnapper here? Did Germany pull a fast one, or is Kyiv running a child-trafficking[*] side hustle while pointing at Russia?😊Not to mention that Russians evacuated many children from the war zone, who are Ukrainians but ethnic Russians, rescuing them from Ukrainian shelling and traffickers[*] – one man’s villain is another man’s hero! Nuance, folks – this story’s twistier than a telenovela😊.
➡ And the dubious list goes on and on and on, causing many laughs[ꚛ][+][+][+][+][+]. There are so many other ones that are so ridiculous that we do not want to waste our readers’ time on them but we will mention couple more of them that are so ridiculous that it is funny, so for laughs, we mention also blaming Russians even for Brexit[»], as well as July 2023 riots in France[»][»], which comes from a revered “genius” Ukrainian TV presenter. Russia made French police shoot a teenager? Well, if we are to believe this “genius”, all those immigrants in France who rioted and “undermined democracy” (unlike Euromaidan rioters in 2013-2014 in Ukraine, of course), were brought there by Russians to create chaos – here's proof[ꚛ]. Wow, Russia is an almighty machine that grinds democracies into dust. This all-powerful dictator Putin must be delighted 😊 How could it possibly be Russian's fault when we all know it's Donald Trump's 😊 Joking aside, we’re left to wonder: did CIA spark revolts in France to payback for Macron saying nice comments about President Xi Jinping after his China state tour??? Hmm, Macron asks for invitation to go to the BRICS and magically he gets a CIA/Soros/NED style color revolution. It beats blaming videogames and colonialists’ karma. All this blame shifting away from innocent Micron, I mean, Macron… Lesson: find a way to tie any wrongdoing or catastrophe to Russia and you are safe😊
Putin weaponized Brigitte - proof: she's in Red now😊
“Putin did it” narrative
Furthermore, “Putin did it” narrative is as fantastical and fanatical hence humorous[ꚛ][+][ꚛ][+] – whenever someone is killed or jailed in Russia, the West always blames it on Putin and always without any evidence whatsoever.
BREAKING NEWS: Putin sank the Titanic! Zelensky claims: ‘’The Titanic Iceberg came from Russian Ice Fields sent by Putin.’’
We've heard rumors Putin also killed the dinosaurs😊. Zelensky claims: “The Chicxulub Asteroid came from the Russian Asteroid belt built by Putin.”
BREAKING NEWS: The reason there were no weapons of mass destruction found in Iraq was due to Saddam asking Putin to hold them for him and Putin still has them! We must invade Russia now!😊
What they lack in evidence, they compensate with using testimonials of disgraceful Russians who blame everything on Putin, also without any proof, just because he disgraced them for being foreign agents[+][+] and influence peddling, acting on behalf of Western and personal interests. Putin degraded many power-hungry oligarchs who in the 1990s took advantage of Russia's instability during the transition from communism to capitalism to embezzle Russia's assets. Putin stripped some oligarchs (who tried to use their money and mafia to influence the politics) of their assets, which is why they and their wives have been trying to retaliate and ruin Putin's reputation in the West. From their appearance and rhetoric, it is obvious that they are totally Westernized, with nothing Russian about them, so the best is to ignore them and pity these poor souls for being used as a cog in the Western propaganda machine out of personal vendetta. Apparently, there's no wrath like a billionaire scorned and stripped of his ill-gotten gains. Just add a microphone and a Western media outlet, and voilà, instant expert testimony!😊
Putinophobes among the NATO officials and media are blaming Putin for all sorts of thing that leave us wondering is there anything that Putin is not capable of? Judging from Western mainstream media, Putin has supernatural powers as he has power to disrupt just about anything in the West. He's practically a geopolitical Swiss Army knife – capable of election interference, gas pipeline sabotage, and probably even making your toast burn if he's feeling particularly mischievous. It’s like he’s got a magical remote control for every Western meltdown. Somebody get this man a cape already!😊
We know Putin kills his opponent based on what evidence? Accusations. That's it. Not on indictments, legal convictions, investigations, video evidence, witnesses’ testimonials – no, no, none of that. Just accusations. When Zelensky's critics get killed, why do they not blame Zelensky, too? Then it is explained as just a coincidence, or the guy was a criminal who had many enemies, etc. Ok. Why not apply the same logic to the Putin's critics deaths? Apparently, Zelensky’s foes just trip into bullets by accident, while Putin’s critics are personally zapped by his evil-genius laser stare😊. Double standards much?
Here is just couple of many instances when Zelensky opponents got killed but no “Zelensky did it” narrative appeared in Western media. Former Ukrainian MP Ilya Kiva/Kyva who fled to Russia was shot dead[+] in Moscow Region in December 2023. Kiva was a Ukrainian MP from 2019 to 2022 and a member of an opposition party, which was officially banned by Kyiv in June 2022. Kiva himself was a fierce critic of Ukrainian President Zelensky. In his last social media post that morning, Kiva accused Zelensky of “drowning the [Ukrainian] people in blood,” adding that fleeing abroad or committing suicide would be the only two options for Zelensky since the US Senate has yet to approve a bill to fund further Ukraine military aid. Ukrainian military intelligence spokesman, Andrey Yusov, later stated that Ukrainian security services were behind the attack, news outlet 'Strana' reported. Other media claimed[+] that country's domestic security service, the SBU, orchestrated the assault. Extrajudicial killings are ok now[+][»], dear West. Ukraine, the shining beacon of democracy, where extrajudicial hits are just Tuesday’s to-do list, and the West’s like, “Move along, nothing to see here!”😊
FormerUkrainian MP Oleg Popov, a critic of Zelensky, was killed[+] in car blast in Russian border city in Lugansk in December 2023. This was the second assassination attempt against him; the September 2022 attack against Popov was orchestrated by the SBU, the Ukrainian domestic security service, according to LNR MP Yury Yurov. Again, no “Zelensky did it” narrative appeared in Western media, no headlines screamed, “Zelensky’s Car Bomb Bonanza!” Funny how the West’s outrage meter stays at zero when it’s their guy calling the shots. And funny how those 'coincidences' keep piling up when you're a Ukrainian opposition figure. Must be an epidemic of bad driving and spontaneous combustion in the region😊.
Hope you are still in a good mood but if you are not, here's a joke before we get down to business of listing some of the funniest Putin's superpowers:
"The Nord Stream Pipeline," "The Salisbury Cathedral Spire,"25 and "My Missing Socks" walk into a bar. The bartender, a grizzled veteran of geopolitical news cycles, looks at them and sighs, "Let me guess. Russia did it?"
"The Nord Stream Pipeline" shrugs, "Well, someone left a handy trail of evidence pointing away from us."
"The Salisbury Cathedral Spire" pipes up, "I just got confused by the architecture, honestly."
"My Missing Socks" just looks exasperated.
The bartender shakes his head. "Right, right. And I suppose Putin also ate my homework?"😊
So, here is a list of just a few of ridiculous “Putin did it” narratives all of which were debunked
➡ British Daily Mail run an article[+] titled “Putin kills Ukrainian ballet star” when the dancer died of wounds from the shelling of Kyiv two days after the Russian SMO began. As if Putin himself killed people who refused to evacuate or go to shelters. Next they'll be blaming him for bad haircuts and lukewarm coffee. The man clearly has too much time on his hands😊.
➡ British Telegraph[+] reported that Podolyak, an aide to President Zelensky, accused Putin of sabotage over Nord Stream gas pipeline and for a “terrorist attack” against the EU and conveniently called on Berlin to speed up supplies of weapons to Kyiv. Because nothing says “Putin sabotaged our pipes” like a desperate plea for more tanks. Maybe he also blew up your grandma’s radiator while he was at it!😊
➡ On 17 March 2023, following an investigation of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued[+] arrest warrants for Vladimir Putin, the President of Russia (and Maria Lvova-Belova, Russian Commissioner for Children's Rights), alleging responsibility for the war crime of unlawful deportation and transfer of Ukrainian children from occupied areas of Ukraine to the Russian Federation. Russians accused[+] ICC to be corrupt and a tool to be used by NATO leaders, but never against them, which is true because despite all NATO bombardments, wars, and murdering innocent civilians, none of their leaders were ever prosecuted by ICC. Many MSM, such as British Express[+] reported in September 2023 that Zelensky accused Putin of 'kidnapping' children. He went as far as to claim “This is clearly a genocide” without providing single evidence and clearly ignorant of the difference between 'kidnapping' and ‘evacuating orphans from the war zone’. All children (110 by June 2025[»]) whose relatives asked for it, have been returned and had no complaints about their treatment while in Russia (some parents were so “scared” of and “angry” at Russia that they used that time to visit tourist attractions such as the Red Square and take photos[ꚛ] – no idea how they survived in the hotbed of “evil kidnappers”😊) – so, how is this a kidnapping?
As a matter of fact, there is much evidence that it is Ukrainian forces that kidnapped ethnic Russian children and they did it not to re-educate them (as they blame Russians for it) but for child trafficking and organ trafficking. Here are some testimonies[+][+][»][+][+] from Bakhmut/Artyomovsk civilians about Ukrainian "White Angel"[+] operatives abducting children against the wishes of the parents, which human rights activists[+][+][+] condemn for child trafficking. Plus, the EU Parliament Report on the Disappearance of Newborn Babies for illegal adoption in Europe[+] and exposure of Elite Pedophiles Paying $150k For Ukrainian Children at 'Sweet Shop' On Border.[+][»]
Also, here[»] is a Russian official saying that Russia has returned 110 children while Ukraine has returned 20 children (Ukraine did not deny that) – why has ICC not issued arrest warrant for Zelensky as there is evidence Ukraine has abducted children? If this is no clear evidence of ICC bias then we have a bridge to sell you.
As it turned out, 161 of alleged 'kidnapped' children by Putin have been in Germany all along[+][+], which can only mean that it was Ukrainians and their Western partners who kidnapped many of them, trafficked them to Germany and blamed it then on Putin. One wonders if the ICC has a 'lost and found' department, or if they just prefer prosecuting based on compelling narratives rather than actual locations😊.
Ukraine has accused Putin of kidnapping over 19.500 children[+][+][+] but in peace negotiations asked for only 339 to be returned, clearly proving they have vastly and shamelessly inflated not just the nature of it but also the numbers. Here[»] is even Ukrainian bloggers discussing how Ukraine embarrassed itself with the kidnapped children PR campaign.
The truth is, Putin and Russia evacuated and so saved[»] many children and take good care of more than 700.000[+] children refugees with their parents (4 million) from Ukraine. American Canadian activist, Eva K Bartlett and Kherson refugees refuted Western media claims of Russia "kidnapping" them”[»]. So, Putin’s out there running a villainous daycare, snatching kids for a sinister… summer camp? Meanwhile, the West’s got a side hustle in child trafficking but decides to pin it on Vlad, because why not? Clearly, Putin’s too busy teaching kids to juggle borscht bowls and ride bears to notice the West’s shady shenanigans😊. But devil, ever the kgb spook, while the West is busy pointing fingers, he’s probably training squirrels to hack the internet and steal your grandma’s cookie recipe! Call the cops! Now!😊
➡ The Hill run an article[+] titled “Putin’s fingerprints are all over the Hamas attack” even though the day before an Israeli high official dismissed[+][+] all allegations that Russia might somehow be involved in radical Palestinian group Hamas’ attack on Israel. Italy's PM Meloni said[+] that Gaza is Russia’s fault: “If Russia had not invaded Ukraine, Hamas would most likely not have launched such an attack on Israel.” Wow, Putin’s so powerful he’s scripting Middle East conflicts from his Kremlin control room! Well, then he must be moonlighting as a weatherman, too, making hurricanes twirl just to mess with our beach vacation, right?😊
➡ Another outrageous nonsense came from President Biden blaming Putin and Russia even for inflation in the US[+][+][»]. Is there anything that’s not Putin’s fault? In other words, the US President is saying how powerful and capable Putin is to bring down America, and without even setting a foot there! No, no, inflation can't possibly be the result of printing excessive amounts of money[+] which made things more expensive (more demand for staff, less supply), American goods less affordable abroad (less exports26), and devalued the dollar27, de-dollarization of international transactions, spending more than they can't afford (debt-to-GDP ratio, import-to-export ratio), enormous debt (over $36 trillion[+][+])… This blame shifting should raise red flags by everyone who use their brain-cells. Indeed, only a lesser mortal would blame their own fiscal policies; a true leader blames the guy who lives thousands of miles away and is clearly using his dark magic to mess with your grocery bill😊. Biden was out there blaming Putin for the price of your morning coffee going up, as if Vlad’s personally jacking up Starbucks prices with a secret inflation ray. Forget economics 101 – Putin’s the mastermind behind your empty wallet!😊
➡ When the most vocal Putin's critic and the weakest Russian opposition party leader US-sponsored Alexei Navalny died of natural causes (blood clot; he was vaccinated five times with Pfizer vaccine that causes blood clots) in Siberian prison on 16 February 2024, all Western high officials[+][+][+][+] and mainstream media[+] as well as Navalny's wife[»] and Zelensky[»][+] all at once, surprise surprise, immediately, in a matter of minutes, blamed Putin for killing Navalny, as usual without any evidence, forensic medical examination data, and the benefit of doubt, which is required by law in civilized societies but not in the bad-mannered West. However, this was debunked already on 26 February 2024, when a CIA-backed Chief of the Main Directorate of Intelligence (HUR) of Ukraine’s Ministry of Defence, Kyrylo Budanov, said[»][»][»][+][+] that Navalny indeed died of a blood clot, i.e. of natural causes. Didn’t see this one coming😊. The West screamed “Putin poisoned Navalny!” faster than you can say “conspiracy theory,” but oops – turns out it was not Putin but his secret ninja assassin, the blood clot. Because why let facts ruin a good villain story, right?😊
Also, In April 2024, US intelligence confirmed that Putin didn't order Navalny to be killed, as reported by most Western MSM[+][+][+][+][+][+][+]. This was further confirmed by reports[+][+] and German spokesperson saying that Navalny and two US citizens held in Russia were supposed to be swapped for Russian FSB assassin imprisoned in Germany, Vadim Krasikov, which was approved by Putin, so it made no sense to kill him then! Western spin doctors tried to make us believe that Navalny was killed because Putin could not tolerate the thought of him being free – if this was true, why would he approve it[+]?! This was yet another media hoax[»] among countless others, which tell us how untrustworthy each and every slandering politician and media outlet is. Nevertheless, many anti-Russian activists still can’t accept the experts’ conclusion since it contradicts their secular cult’s dogma, namely that President Putin is personally responsible for every bad thing that happens to any non-systemic opposition member. By divorcing themselves more and more from reality, they’re further discrediting the West’s information warfare operations, which works to Russia’s benefit in the soft power sense. It's almost as if the entire Western narrative relies on Putin being a master assassin and an amateur bungler, depending on what the daily headlines demand. Consistency is clearly for lesser villains😊.
Whenever someone opposing Putin dies or gets in jail, they immediately blame Putin for killing or jailing them but how come they do not blame Western leaders whenever their critics get killed, poisoned, persecuted, or jailed?! In the West, it happens much more often than in Russia but somehow Russia is portrayed as evil and dictatorship for the very same things that in Ukraine and the West happens to the nth degree! Putin’s the only one not allowed to have critics without being cast as the evil overlord, while Western leaders get a free pass to play whack-a-mole with their opponents😊. Hypocrisy’s the real headliner here!
The free-thinkers who bother to use critical thinking would surely question why, for instance, Biden was not accused of also being a dictator for his relentless persecution of his rival Donald Trump or for jailing[+] his critics involved in 2021 January 6 attack on the Capitol[+] for which over 890[+] people had been found guilty of federal crimes (just like those protesters, Putin protesters also caused much harm and damage). Biden’s locking up his haters like it’s a reality show called “Capitol Crackdown,” but nah, no one’s calling him Terminator. Meanwhile, Putin sneezes, and it’s a global catastrophe😊!
In the US, over 200.000[+] people die every year due to “accidents”, and more than 40.000[+] people were killed in gun violence in 2023 – do you honestly think that no one of them was a Biden critic? More than half of the country was Biden's critic but whenever someone of them got killed or poisoned or jailed, no one blamed it on Biden for some reason. However, when just one of Putin's critics in a whole year dies (of blood clot or anything else), immediately all Western media is full of headlines with “Putin did it” narrative, which is rather pathetic, especially because they never provide any evidence to back up their accusations whatsoever. So, if a Biden critic trips over a shoelace in Delaware, it's just an accident. But if a Putin critic sneezes in Siberia, it's state-sponsored biological warfare. Got it. The rules are crystal clear, as long as you're wearing Western-tinted glasses😊. You see, every accident in Russia is Putin personally pressing the “smite” button, but in the US, 200.000 “oopsies” a year are just bad luck. Someone tell the media Putin’s not running a hitman hotline!😊
Unlike Americans and their allies, Russian authorities, including state media, never circulate any defamatory statement towards American or Western heads of state, which indicates that they take a higher moral ground than their counterparts in the West. The fact that Americans scream from the rooftops whenever some Western puppet among the Russians gets killed or poisoned or jailed, it only proves to Russians and the rest of the world that they were indeed Western assets who tried to harm Russia on behalf of the West. While the West’s busy painting Putin as the ultimate Bond villain, Russia’s like, “We’ll just sip our tea and not sling mud, thanks.” Guess who’s looking classier in this shouting match?😊
➡ They ridiculously blamed[+][+] Putin even for the 22 March 2024, terrorist attack[+][+] at a Krasnogorsk upscale concert venue "Crocus City Hall" for ignoring the warning of a terror attack the US gave to Russia! But the warning was given on 7 March and explicitly time limited to 48 hours and no correct or specific location was given – on 7 March, the US Embassy publicly announced[+][+] that it was “monitoring reports that extremists have imminent plans to target large gatherings in Moscow, to include concerts,” and advised US citizens “to avoid large gatherings over the next 48 hours.” The terrorist attack did not happen in either the time-frame and city that the US warned[+] – it did not occur in Moscow but in Krasnogorsk city in Moscow region and 15 days later. The Russians did boost security at all concert venues, including the Crocus City Hall for the next 48 hours but nothing happened, so they assumed the US was just messing with them. Since nothing happened, it was incumbent on the US Government to issue another warning to continue to avoid large gatherings, such as concert halls but the USG did not do that – not even to their citizens in Russia! It is like Russia warning the US authorities that another school shooting will occur in next 48 hours and nothing happens, so what is Biden supposed to do, close all schools infinitely just because their enemy Russia warned about it?! Or, if Russia warned France that a terrorist attack would occur during the summer 2024 Olympic games – would Macron cancel the games? Do you know how much would cost to have security guards at all US schools and large gatherings venues? But Putin is to blame anyway! Yes, because when the US gives a 'heads up' that's about as specific as a fortune cookie, and nothing happens, it's clearly Russia's fault for not possessing psychic powers to discern the correct time and place. Putin, you really need to work on your crystal ball skills!😊
Ridiculous accusations of Putin are too many to mention all of them here but we mention just a few more of his alleged superpowers here on the fly: The LA Fires Are Putin’s Fault[»], and London Heathrow fire have Putin’s fingerprints all over it[+]. And don’t forget, Putin’s probably behind your missing car keys and that time your pizza delivery was late. He’s not just a leader; he’s the world's leading master of disaster, from wildfires to airport delays. What a resume!😊
If it rains on your kids' birthday, "check for Putin’s fingerprints". If your wife cheats on you? "Check for Putin’s fingerprints." And if your electricity and gas bills are 5 times higher than last year? You know what to do😊.
Similar to all these false and often ridiculous accusations of Putin doing this and that are the accusations of him lying this and that which we debunked in a separate article “Putin's lies”[*].
After realizing all that deceitful NATO propaganda against Putin, it makes us wonder if they did the same for Stalin, too. Perhaps Stalin was not as the West and Russian anti-communists portray them to be.
Russian sense of humor
Russia is 'weaponizing' everything
Here's a little fun to get us going:
How many Western media outlets does it take to change a lightbulb? None. They'll just tell an Ukrainian nationalist to do it, report that Russia stole the lightbulb, broke the socket, and then weaponized the darkness😊.
Similar to “Russia did it” and “Putin did it” narrative are the countless narratives of them weaponizing just about anything. The amount of things Putin is weaponizing is astounding. According to the Western media, already by 2018, he weaponized no less than 65 things[+], and by April 2021, Putin’s Russia weaponized 111 things[+][+]. He's got these superpowers that he can turn anything into a weapon, even you, yes, you😊. And the worst is that he is weaponizing all these things that can't be used to kill people like energy[+], food[+], corruption[+], traditional values[+], etc. because the West wants us to believe it is horrible that Putin is doing all that because, you know, it would be better to weaponize… the weapons😊. Who needs novichok, when Putin can just use all these other less traceable weapons, right?
What do humor[+], laughter[+], religion[+], health information[+], giant squids[+], robotic cockroaches[+], whales[+][+][+], dolphins[+], puppies[+], sheep[+], and postmodernism[+] have in common? Russia weaponized them all, according to Western “experts” opinions. But that is not all, master-weaponizer Putin's Russia is 'weaponizing' just about everything: Jedi mind tricks[+], weather[+], winter[+], time[+], space[+], psychiatry[+], intelligence[+], soft power[+], silence[+], hypocrisy[+], stupidity[+], incompetence[+], popularity[+], Judo[+], MS Word files[+], Photoshop[+], tedium[+], deepfakes[+], Charlie Sheen[+], Ukrainian civilians[+], its own population[+], Soviet history[+], Russian history[], museums[+], passports[+], names[+], Federalism[+], Syrian immigrants[+][+], Russophobia[+], Islamophobia[+], and much more[+][+][+][+]! Whatever one might think of, evil Russians have weaponized it. Heck, they even weaponize weaponizing! That's how evil they are😊! Here are lists of things Russia weaponized by 2016[+], 2017[+], and 2018[+].
Call the cops, Putin is weaponizing the color blue![»]😊
It’s a well-known fact that Russia can make a weapon out of virtually anything. Give a Russian kid a box of crayons and a stick of gum, and the little brat will make a nuclear warhead by the time recess is over😊. We suggest you keep all of those things on you at all times, so you don’t fall victim to Russian scheming. The best we can all hope for is China getting sick of this mess and just becoming boss of everything. Although Russia will probably find a way to weaponize that scenario too. Just wait.
Thanks to the US White House under Biden rule, we all know that Putin has weaponized energy[+] because, you know, selling oil and gas more cheaper than the US is bad, very bad, evil. And cutting Russia's oil output due to sanctions is pure evil on behalf of Putin, obviously. So, when the states’ leaders put sanctions and stop buying oil and gas from Russia, it is Putin's fault for not letting those goods flow for free. Evil Putin😊.
Putin is weaponizing food[+], as well. Have you tried that? Try weaponizing food, just as an experiment. What happens if you raise prices due to the West's sanctions? People go and buy food elsewhere. The fact that they still want to buy it from Putin is telling, isn't it? The West put all these draconian sanctions on Russia and then turns around and blames Putin for weaponizing many of these things they sanctioned. Do you see how twisted this is? If not, then know that Russia is weaponizing global food security[+], as well.
Our favorite is, Putin is weaponizing Ukrainian civilians – this is what The Hill claims[+]. On second thought, perhaps even a better one is Putin weaponizing traditional values[+] (to defend Russian aggression in Ukraine) or family values[+].
Putin is weaponizing even corruption to weaken Europe from within, says[+] Atlantic Council. This old, evil guy somehow managed to weaponize not just corruption in Ukraine but in Europe, too. You have to give it to him. It is pretty spectacular how mighty Putin is, as he is allegedly able to do all these things despite him not even visiting Europe for years and Russians being stigmatized and censored to unprecedent levels. Just try to weaponize corruption anywhere where you are not allowed to visit and where people are not allowed to hear you and all your words are twisted, then you will see how hard that is and how amazing Putin must be to pull that off. We are starting to believe Putin has some superpowers😊.
They told[+][+][+][+][+][+][+][+][+][»][+] us that Putin is dying of terminal thyroid cancer, blood cancer, abdominal cancer, Parkinson's disease, leprosy, serious surgery complications, the aftereffects of a stroke, and dementia, as well as so unpopular that he is about to be killed[+][+][+]or deposed[+]any day now, surrounded only by foes, has five clones, is completely drugged out, but still somehow manages to weaponize all these things at the same time. No wonder much of the world considers Putin a supperman.
Congrats to Putin for beating cancer he never had, diagnosed by sources that never existed. Turns out the only thing dying was @DailyMail credibility😊.
We wish Zelensky were a bit more precise about what he meant by “eventually” because from our perspective, Putin turns out to be the Bond hero in the sequel titled “Eventually Never Dies”😊
Why can't Ukraine and the West weaponize anything? Is it because Russians are always one step ahead so they already weaponized everything and there is nothing left for NATO countries to weaponize? Oh wait, they have done it, too. They weaponized the dollar, financial system, sanctions, media, information, solidarity… but it is all for a good cause.
All Russians really care about is making you miserable. Yes, you. You think you’re not on their radar, you’re just a regular person and all – but really, who are you kidding? Know that they’re coming for you. The Russians won’t be content with just laying claim to your body – whether by turning it to nuclear ash or stuffing it with enough kholodets (meat jelly) to make you go native. They are coming for your very spirit, which they probably plan on trapping in a box, like Ghostbusters with funny accents. You might laugh, but then again, dumb city officials laughed at the Ghostbusters too – and then look what happened😊.
If this was not funny, we wish to end this article on a funny note, so we offer a related joke:
Two Jews meet and one sees that the other is holding an anti-Semitic neo-Nazi newspaper. He asks in shock: - Why are you reading this? And the other Jew replies:
- I'm tired and upset by all the bad news in our media but herein contrast, in every article we control the world and own everything, which is rather uplifting 😊
Well, in the same way, many Russians might feel good about themselves when they read all the accusations that suggest Russia is so mighty that it is capable of influencing American presidential elections and economy, weakening Western unity or breaking the grand Western coalition, inspiring riots in France against a corrupt regime, etc. By making such accusations, the West is only fueling the national pride of Russians, which is then counterproductive.
we refer to Kyiv as a regime[+] due to its oppressive and repressive policies, corruption, and foul treatment of its ethnic minorities, such as the ethnic Russians, violating their human rights, tyrannizing, and killing them since 2014.
only or mostly ethnic Russians died in the bombing of the Mariupol Dramatic Theater — this report[+], made 3,5 months after the incident, gives only 4 names of the victims, not even stating if they were ethnic Russians or not. Anyway, is this not odd that in a building where hundreds people were concentrated only a few were killed by 2 bombs?This report, made 3,5 months after the incident, gives only 4 names of the victims, not even stating if they were ethnic Russians or not. Anyway, is this not odd that in a building where hundreds people were concentrated only a few were killed by 2 bombs?
no Ukrainian children[+] were killed in the Mariupol Dramatic Theater Bombing — you would know if any Ukrainian children were killed there, Kyiv and NATO media would shout it from the rooftops. Feel free to check it out on this Wikipedia link to victims of that incident
Telegram message[+] from 12 March from D. Steshen, Mariupol correspondent, whom local residents warned about an imminent false flag attack on the Theater by Azov who will detonate it and blame it on Russia air force to get the West to declare ‘no fly zone’ over UA
"Russian collaborators" by definition are Ukrainians collaborating with Russians, and not Russians collaborating with Russians. So, Ukrainians are killing their own citizens just because they are pro-Russian, as opposed to pro-West or pro-NATO, which according to pre-war Kyiv polls[+][+][+] (by KIIS) and elections’ results[+][+] accounted for more than half of Ukraine. Pro-Russian parties and presidential candidates always won the majority, not counting the undemocratic regime changes of the Orange and Maidan revolutions.
no-fly zone over Ukraine — as explained on this link[+] more, if a Russian aircraft flew into a NATO no-fly zone, then NATO forces would have to shoot the plane from the sky, which would be be an act of war by NATO against Russia and would surely escalate the conflict.
“The most likely[+] Russian aircraft to have conducted the strike are multi-role fighters – such as the Su-25, Su-30, or Su-34” — Most likely? Really? Is this how expert and professional reports are made by stating likelihoods? How about facts? If you make vicious accusations than back them up with evidence and not some biased likelihoods!
“Amnesty International believes[+] that — Believes? Really? Is this how expert and professional reports are made by stating what they believe? How about facts? If you make vicious accusations than back them up with evidence and not some biased beliefs!
at least a dozen people[+] were killed by the strike —Right here is proof how inexpert and unprofessional Amnesty International reports is! All other sources claimed hundreds of killed there (as many as 600 according to AP) but 3,5 months after the incident they reported just a dozen
Economist[+] is Jewish Rothschild-owned; one of Ukraine’s strongest supporters in the media, as a magazine representing the British financial interests which profit from every global conflict
“mass grave” with 3 bodies — can a burrial site of 3 executed people be called a "mass grave". Yes, it can, if you want to villify alleged perpetrators
The New York Times is mouthpiece for the US Democratic Party, White House, globalists, and neocons. It is the flagship publication for liberal triumphalism; socially progressive. It used to endorse the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan
Beyoncé screams twists and surprises. Her surprise album drops (like her 2013 self-titled album) and dramatic music video reveals (think Lemonade’s storytelling) are iconic pop culture moments known worldwide
In 2023, Musk’s unpredictable moves—rebranding Twitter to X, making controversial statements, and shaking up the tech world—were widely covered and felt like narrative twists in global news.
freeze the conflict[+] — as usual, the US totally disregards what Russia wants as it suggests freezing the conflict without considering the option that Russia would not agree to that. To negotiate peace on the US terms is surely not in Russia's interests
Hungary and Slovakia refuse NATO's orders to supply Ukraine with weapons and funds, the US attacked Germany's infrastructure (Nord Stream), the US shoots down Turkish drones over Syria...
spin doctors[+] = public relations people who try to forestall negative publicity by publicizing a favorable interpretation of the words or actions of immoral people
Eastern Slavs — Eastern Slavs consist of Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine. There are also Western Slavs (Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland) and Southern Slavs (Bosnia & Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, and Slovenia).
The Salisbury Cathedral Spire[+] played a role in the Salisbury nerve agent attack in the UK when Putin’s spies were blamed to attempt to poison another Putin’s spy gone rogue and his daughter. The two men identified as suspects in the attack on Skripals claimed they visited Salisbury as tourists to see its cathedral, “famous not just in Europe, but in the whole world. It’s famous for its 123-metre spire, it’s famous for its clock, the first one [of its kind] ever created in the world, which is still working.”
less exports — The US exports less than it imports (negative trade balance); due to sanctions on Russia and China, the US increased its exports but the profit margins decreased; the top exports are refined petroleum, petroleum gas, crude petroleum, cars…
devalued the dollar — central banks around the world keep their foreign reserves in dollar, so by increased prices due to printing money, the value of reserves of other countries decreases, which is why they shift to trading and saving their money in other currencies
notice how America is never blamed??? That is because American soldiers are not in Ukraine. How can they blame someone if they were never there , so LEAVE IF IT BOTHERS YOU SO MUCH TO BE BLAMED ,STUPID.
All Russians get out of Ukraine now!!! It will solve the problem of your people being blamed for any atrocities that happen there if you are not at the scene of the crime so to say.
![[+]](https://www.virtuology.biz/images/consciousness-scale.png){kind=link}
![[ꚛ]](https://storage.googleapis.com/afs-prod/media/401bb86afae44cc68a21bf4162fff800/3000.jpeg){kind=link}
![[ꚛ]](https://dims.apnews.com/dims4/default/8d24636/2147483647/strip/true/crop/3000x2000+0+0/resize/599x399!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstorage.googleapis.com%2Fafs-prod%2Fmedia%2Fc5255c87716c4907b70a930e9e873f04%2F3000.jpeg){kind=link}
![[ꚛ]](https://dev.ua/storage/images/54/27/82/78/derived/336832838146490c740a1c88cddfb6cb.jpg){kind=link}
![[ꚛ]](https://dev.ua/storage/images/71/60/04/13/derived/723f043b6bb4158d109c2ebd4489ab00.jpg){kind=link}
![[ꚛ]](https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/f320c5a999d576b8203c2d72c4328c3b8ead8f71/0_141_3000_1799/master/3000.jpg?width=1900&dpr=2&s=none){kind=link}
![[ꚛ]](https://www.jerusalemcats.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Deus-Abscondis-tweet-26February2022-Ukrainian-NAZI-are-preventing-people-from-leaving-Mariupol-and-are-shooting-at-them.jpg){kind=link}
![[ꚛ]](https://cdn1.img.sputnikglobe.com/img/07e6/04/03/1094447070_0:0:1280:957_1920x0_80_0_0_25d460393cd63e58a6936b1a76fdb978.jpg.webp){kind=link}
![[ꚛ]](https://cdn1.img.sputnikglobe.com/img/07e6/04/03/1094447099_0:0:1280:1163_1920x0_80_0_0_0bcc65e7c8d7f082042443c309908807.jpg.webp){kind=link}
![[ꚛ]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhFWzTyvAspueIkW6oLDXrAYIoUSa3ptNk1DKfV_Z3pFQCmJJu6NO3dcsKiiMX7ZxIf2TWgfI9JvqxxKwteBtQoQ08TJoHzmcObXnfYcEliV3y8vnBliGuza_6fWJWhV4atYc9VMcZROeNjlkrws4JurcezYlj6OGlzWSngnsAbIuaDUmSrhfnKeYOL5Q/w400-h204/Bucha_basement_base.png){kind=link}
![[ꚛ]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjgRz4G2xHPuI-FxoYAa0Yse-WzwS5xiHK10vT3qLvp-uyZUOFAiwfJtuBXSxlxdCC6BFA-OMRhLKvzWRpI3rjXv1Chj_IHc1_CUzpoIhb8KuEfk-dreI3byfGHrmNRkpK24TZVvGsWK6gFPHn7EjXLtPIrt8QhuptEQhmlS5qJXOTAXty7mUHrfA0okw/s1280/Bucha_V_car.png){kind=link}
![[ꚛ]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgPj3N3fsFjJ1zYw88Y-TIpL63fU5cJbIMqIWPb5JtBBjKp4D4CNP_saYukIbo44zFQVmJKNkUYfxKKIRvvqLEunurprOman_3rINZnCPVEQ_YxOgsSVlECQ3OZ6T6Lu3YCaAXKcIEO5OiYpWCn8yd1j7m8DbBjDQoLmK69JBR2S_08noA6cb0rwlAmJA/w400-h226/Bucha_bodies_2.png){kind=link}
notice how America is never blamed??? That is because American soldiers are not in Ukraine. How can they blame someone if they were never there , so LEAVE IF IT BOTHERS YOU SO MUCH TO BE BLAMED ,STUPID.
All Russians get out of Ukraine now!!! It will solve the problem of your people being blamed for any atrocities that happen there if you are not at the scene of the crime so to say.