Neutrality in the Ukraine Conflict: Because Picking Sides Is So Last Century😊 You have a permission to be neutral because neutrality is a virtue, while rivalry is a flaw.
Welcome to the peace initiative for Ukraine in which you can contibute by raising your awareness as well as your consciousness[+] and spirit to the modes[+] of neutrality, decency, respectfulness, wisdom[*], objectivity, mastery of the intellect, surrender (ego and mind to God’s will), and finally peace (inner then outer). To properly grasp everything, we recommend reading the articles of this peace initiative in the order that we[*] designed it, which is listed in the Contents. So if you haven’t read the previous articles, we urge you to do it, please.
Bible, Acts 10:34[+][+] states that “God does not show partiality/favoritism”.
You have a permission to be neutral to act in likeness of God and because neutrality is a virtue, while rivalry is a flaw.
Let's kick off this vital topic with a joke of the day, courtesy of a pilot with a plan😊, shall we?
Joe Biden finds $100 on the floor of the aircraft and says: "I will throw the money out of the aircraft and make 1 person happy." Zelensky interrupts him, stating that if they split the $100 bill into 2 $50 bills, they can make 2 people happy. Putin insists that they should throw 4 $25 bills and make 4 people happy. The pilot of the plane, overhearing their conversation, turns to his co-pilot and tells him "Should I throw this plane in the sea and make 8 billion people happy?"
Okay, back to serious business... sort of 😊. In this article we talk about neutrality as in a) not taking a side in this conflict, and also b) not joining a military alliance of any side (NATO or CSTO1). Above all, we encourage you to activate and cultivate the virtue of neutrality, which is a prerequisite for achieving peace that is the ultimate goal of this wisdom-driven peace initiative.
Neutrality is not the highest virtue of them all but it is a virtue that is higher mode of consciousness2[+] than flaws such as hatred, prejudices, phobia (Russophobia, etc.), and such and it is the mode of consciousness needed to assess which side to support (if any at all) and the mode needed to reconcile the conflicted sides as a peacemaker. When one side notices that a peacemaker is siding with the opponent and as such is not competent to address the needs of both sides equally, no peace can come out of it.
After all of us, who are eager to bring peace in Europe, raise our consciousness to the level of neutrality, we do not have to stay at that level as we can progress to higher and higher levels of consciousness, further and further away from the low, destructive modes of consciousness (a.k.a. flaws) such as hatred, prejudices, phobia, rivalry, pride, arrogance, threat, intimidation, contentious, rage, aggressiveness, insulting, resentment, bitterness, atheism, hatred, anger, passivity, victimhood, criticalness, fearfulness, lying (“for a good cause”), and such.
For those who maintain that neutrality is rather a flaw if they are led to believe that this war is a battle between good and evil, at the end of this article, we offer arguments for siding with one or the other side with the aim of ending the horrific war in Ukraine by means of raising awareness and consciousness rather than by military means.
Neutrality[+] is the choice not to take a side in a conflict of others. Neutrality implies tolerance regardless of how disagreeable, deplorable, or unusual a perspective might be. In conflict moderation3 and mediation4, neutrality is expected to make decisions or facilitate dialogue independent of any bias, emphasizing the process rather than the outcome. Neutral parties are often perceived as more trustworthy, reliable, and safe. Neutrality is synonymous with non-alignment and adopts a position of a middle ground or golden middle way[+] – the middle between two opposing sides, which was advocated in Antique Greek thought (by Plato and Aristotle). Neutrality is NOT synonymous and should not be confused with indifference or disinterest, or allowing the evil, as some NATO information warriors try to sell it while urging neutral countries to side with Ukraine and NATO.
Warning: since the world has not come on board with NATO's and Kyiv's calls to abandon their neutrality, the West is trying to redefine neutrality to suit them, so beware of it and know that here, we do not mean the Western new definition or view of neutrality, which is a (not so) covert version of siding with NATO & Ukraine.
For instance, Switzerland has historically (since 1815, after the defeat of Napoleon) officially always been a neutral state[+] but they certainly do not act as one in this conflict between NATO-Ukraine and Russia. There are many facts proving they abandoned neutrality (adopted sanctions imposed by the EU against Russia, Swiss Presidents showing support for Kyiv by visiting Kyiv in October 2022 and November 2023 but not visiting Moscow at all, providing aid to Kyiv-controlled area of Ukraine but none whatsoever to ethnic Russians in Ukraine, froze the Russian assets, close airspace to Russian airlines, ended preferential visa rules for Russian citizens…) but clear evidence is the fact that when they hosted a peace summit (a.k.a. piss summit or, as some less charitable observers called it, the 'Let's Talk About Russia Without Russia' summit😊) in June 2024, they did not invite Russia to participate in discussions but only to sign the declaration in the end, to agree to anything the West decides – how generous! Like inviting someone to dinner only to hand them the bill and the dirty dishes😊. Russians accused[+][+] Switzerland of abandoning their neutrality, which Switzerland denied[+][+] but you be the judge. It's more like being 'neutrally' supportive by sending everything but the kitchen sink, painted in camouflage😊. The point we are making is, this type of so-called neutrality is not what we mean here.
The absolute prerequisite for any self-respecting international organizations to broker actual peace in Ukraine is neutrality. Without it, both sides would dismiss them as biased referees who’s clearly on one team’s payroll. During the Biden years, these organizations were politely “encouraged” (with all the diplomatic subtlety of a mafia shakedown😊) to fall in line and parrot NATO-friendly talking points. Then the Trump administration arrived, and suddenly some of them remembered that “peace” is a thing. Miracles do happen.😊
In February 2025, the UN Security Council even adopted[+][+] a US-drafted resolution that dared to take a neutral stance on the conflict in Ukraine without the usual ritualistic Russia-bashing, as US President Trump sought to broker an end to the war for the sake of winning a Nobel Prize. In his classic deal-maker mode, he basically told everyone: “Let’s try ending the war instead of virtue-signaling it to death.”😊 US Democrats-puppets in the EU didn’t get the joke, so the war went on as usual.
The Western public has been masterfully marinated into backing Ukraine based on the blockbuster hit “The War Started in February 2022 When Russia Invaded Out of Nowhere” – totally unprovoked, out of the blue, just for funsies.😊 Great script. Terrible history. This NATO script reminds us of the Nazi “big lie”[+] scheme, which is inventing and endlessly repeating a lie so colossal that no one would believe the establishment could have the impudence to distort the truth so outrageously.
The conflict’s roots go back further – like 2008, when Ukraine ditched its constitutional neutrality faster than a bad Tinder date, deciding its long-standing neutrality was passé, and started quasi-dating NATO (an alliance whose whole business model is profiting from Russophobia, and whose raison d’être is animosity towards Russia because it challenges Western hegemony). By abandoning its neutrality, Ukraine violated its Constitution, Declaration of Independence, and all treaties with Russia. The armed conflict did not start in February 2022 but in April 2014[*][»] when Ukraine invaded Russian ethnic minorities in south-eastern Ukraine who weren’t thrilled with the NATO-backed violent regime change.
They protested against the coup and the new anti-Russian, US-puppet, neo-Nazi regime that came to power by force ousting a democratically elected government. Fascist junta decided ethnic Russians in the southeast protesting the regime change needed a serious attitude adjustment via artillery. These folks were quickly branded terrorists and treated to eight years of shelling, restrictions, and general unpleasantness – resulting in tragic civilian casualties, injuries, and millions displaced.
The new unelected regime consisting largely from neo-Nazis was funded and backed by the US and other NATO countries and immediately started pushing anti-Russian legislations such as banning the free use of Russian language in a country where 14,3 million[+] people declared Russian as their native language – this is, of course, a violation of human linguistic rights but “civilized” West didn’t care. Like Nazis in Germany who discriminated against the Jews and Slavs, Kyiv regime5 discriminated against the ethnic Russians instituting a fascist, apartheid regime. Of course, they had the right to protest but the new neo-Nazi regime declared them as terrorists and shelled, tortured[+], slaughtered[»][»][»], terrorized[»][»], and tyrannized[+][+][+][+][+][+]them for 8 long years killing around 14.000 people[+][+][+](plus injuring 54.000, and forcing 2,6 million people to flee their homes) before Putin sent his troops in 2022 to rescue them from terror[»]. You can debate the “rescue” part, but pretending the war is unprovoked is creative historical fan-fiction.
Here is evidence of what can be described as a Darth Vader monologue – the fascist Hitler-like speech[»][»] by then-President of Ukraine (2014–2019), neo-Nazi Poroshenko6 , who declared fascist apartheid policies in a notoriously bombastic political speech on 23 October 2014 when he threatened to oppress and discriminate against children and civilians of ethnic Russians in Donbas7 (worse than Hitler did with the Jews): "We will have a job – they won't. We will have pensions – they won't. We will have the support of people – children and pensioners – but they won't. Our children will go to schools and kindergartens, and they will sit in their basements. Because they don't know how to do anything! That's how, that's how we will win this war." Charming. Nothing builds national unity like promising your own citizens’ kids will rot in basements. Oscar for Best Villain Speech in a Real-Life Drama goes to...😊. He was referring to the Civil War in Donbas 2014-2022[+][+][+] that he started and conducted with his anti-Russian, tyrannic policies[+][+][+][+][+][+] and sending neo-Nazi battalions to Donbas to kill[»][»][»], torture[+], and terrorize[»][»] ethnic Russian civilians who protested his anti-Russian regime.
With this article, we warmly invite everyone outside Ukraine and Russia to embrace neutrality rather than pick a team based on whichever propaganda feed is louder today😊. Ukrainians included: maybe reconsider joining NATO.
There’s no need to violate your own Declaration of Independence (which explicitly pledged neutrality) just to pay 2% of GDP for club membership for the “privilege” of your sons acting as extras in America’s global action movies[+], fighting and dying for globalist war profiteers. Joining an alliance whose entire raison d’être is hostility toward your largest neighbor isn’t “security” – it’s signing up for the world’s most expensive game of geopolitical chicken😊.
If everyone involved had simply practiced the forgotten virtue of neutrality, there would be no war in Ukraine today! Simple as that.
As confirmed by all peace negotiators[+][+][+] from both sides (Ukrainian[+][+][»][»][+][+][+] and Russian[+][+][+]) and many Western outlets like the WSJ[+], all Russia wanted from Ukraine was to remain neutral – honoring its own Declaration of Independence[+][+][+] and treaties with Russia, in which Ukraine promised neutrality and the minority rights. Instead, Ukraine violated all that and more – got played like a fiddle by NATO con-men, foolishly took the bait hook, line, and sinker since 2008, turbo-charged by the 2014 Maidan regime change op which was orchestrated and funded by NATO to replace the unsubmissive, democratically-elected centrist government with an ultra-right, US-puppet regime that immediately started legislating anti-Russian policies (like Nazi regime did with anti-Semitic policies).
If the Western public stayed neutral instead of naïvely falling for the “solidarity” narrative with virtue-signaling prompts and mainlining war fever – if it were less cheerleader and more referee – the warmongering leaders and war profiteers wouldn’t have had the necessary backing and power to turn containable dispute into a meat grinder. With our help, they turned Ukrainians into cannon fodder and pawns in NATO’s geopolitical chess game to weaken Russia so as to preserve and expand Western hegemony. If it were not for NATO backing, Ukrainians would not have grown the arrogance to think they could defeat the nuclear superpower Russia with Western support. History apparently repeats itself: Ukrainian nationalists betting everything on NATO today is the same fatal mistake their predecessors made betting on Nazi Germany eighty years ago. Ukrainian nationalists never learn – last time they pinned their hopes on Hitler’s Germany, now they’re doing the sequel with their successors in NATO. Different costumes, identical delusion. Spoiler: it doesn’t end well.
We are neutral because:
neutrality is a virtue – a calm, mode of consciousness1, as opposed to the emotional intelligence of a Twitter thread at 3 a.m.😊 – the low-vibe cocktail of rivalry, hatred, victim mentality, blame games, insults, intimidation, arrogance, pessimism, and other destructive modes of consciousness (flaws)
neutrality means being open-minded, objective, and fair instead of biased, one-sided, unbalanced, prejudiced, rigid, discriminatory, hypocritical, and “my side can do no wrong” deranged.
the war in Ukraine is not a a cosmic battle between good and evil (you don’t stay neutral in actual good-vs-evil fights) – Ukraine is certainly not the epitome of good and Russia is not the epitome of evil. This isn’t a Lord of the Rings battle between pure good and cartoon evil. Ukraine isn’t Gandalf. Russia isn’t Sauron. Both have done plenty to complicate the plot.😊
neutrality is rooted in Oneness and rises above childish dualistic worldview, which is a mindset of enlightened minds (exceptions exist for genuine holy wars backed by spiritual or divine authority to uproot the evil such as genocide, ethnic cleansing, neo-Nazism, white supremacy, racism, nationalism driven by hatred of another nation, corruption, human trafficking, perversion, depravity, and such[+]; no person or nation is evil by definition as in essence, we are all made in the image of God, no exceptions – yes, even the ones you dislike on social media😊).
neutrality is mandatory for real conflict mediation and peace arbitration to facilitate dialogue independent of any bias. You can’t referee a fight while openly wearing one team’s jersey😊.
peacemakers must be genuinely objective and neutral to be able to appeal to both sides to make peace; they can’t be opposite of neutral – biased, preferential, partisan, or subjective. Biased “mediators” are just cheerleaders with better stationery😊.
neutrality is tantamount to TheNon-Aligned Movement[+] – a forum of 120 countries smart enough to refuse joining any major power bloc’s fan club (not formally aligned with or against any bloc).
neutrality is aligned with the universal law of polarity, which regulates the balanced interaction of opposites in the world.
An average Ukrainian and Westerner has already been force-fed enough “Russia bad” and “evil Putin” content to last them a lifetime, so there is no point for us to add any more to your daily outrage diet. Therefore, forgive us if we don’t sound enough pro-Ukrainian for your taste by piling on more of the same greatest hits you’ve heard 10.000 times pointing out all the Russian wrongdoings and justifying Ukrainian ones.
We’re both pro-Ukrainian and pro-Russian because we’re pro-humanity. All of mankind is created by God, so as all humans, Russians are God’s children like everyone else. Therefore, we do not judge people – we let God be the judge, confident that we all reap what we sow, as God is just.
In Bible’s Genesis 1:26–27, 31[+]: “Let us make mankind in our image… So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them… God saw all that he had made, and it was very good.”
Western audiences don’t need us to echo that Russian media pushes narratives –Western mainstream outlets8 do that 24/7. But genuine neutrality in this peace initiative requires balancing the scales: pointing out that Ukrainian and Western messaging has its own greatest hits of selective storytelling and not all revelations from Russia are propaganda. Balance isn’t betrayal; it’s basic intellectual hygiene.😊
We’ll lay out undeniable facts and evidence in due course and try to neutralize some disinformation as well as close the massive gap between public opinion and actual reality. Hopefully this balanced slap of reality will convince you to back this wisdom-driven peace initiative. Because if we wait for the ruling classes to end this war, we’ll all be speaking in radioactive ashes😊.
Since 2022, “neutrality” has become a dirty word in the West – roughly equivalent to “I like both Star Wars and Star Trek.”😊 Ukrainian and NATO leaders have run a relentless smear campaigns and character assassinations to shame, sanction, or cancel anyone refusing to pick their side. As if staying out of other people’s family feud makes you the villain. In such insane environment and twisted reality, we are forced to justify our own neutral stance, which would otherwise be absurd in any other situation, as neutrality is a virtue, rather than a flaw. Who are we to judge who is good and who is evil in this conflict?! We do not presume to be the judge here.
And who exactly appointed Ukraine or NATO as the official arbiters of good and evil? Many facts suggest and evidence actually suggest otherwise. The story is far more complicated – which is precisely why we all need to avoid the same mass psychosis that led Germans into antisemitism during WWII. The Western establishment’s Russophobia campaign since 2014 has been running on similar factory settings: fear + hatred + relentless propaganda reinforcement. Western leaders and their pawns in political, academic, news, and entertainment space have created such a hate-driven culture in the West toward Russia that questioning the “neutrality is evil” line feels radical.
If anyone is evil, then it would be more likely those who condemn the virtue of neutrality, intimidate neutral nations, and egoistically claim they are the good ones and their enemy is evil while coercing neutral people to take their side with all kinds of evil measures (by force, sanctions, smear campaigns, character assassinations, etc.).
Russia isn’t the side going around threatening neutral countries with economic Armageddon for staying out of it. It is the Ukraine and the West that do that, so… Funny how blurred are the lines between villains and goodies😊.
Context matters enormously. Condemning neutrality is one thing when Jesus or priests do it in a clear moral struggle between good and evil. It’s quite another when Russophobic military leaders and war profiteers do it wearing “we’re the good guys” costumes while sanctioning neutral nations that keep trading with all sides as usual. The self-appointed do-gooders tend to have skin (and stock options) in the game. If warmongers, fearmongers, or hatemongers bully you into abandoning neutrality specifically to join their side (while claiming moral superiority), run the other way.
Notably, Russian leadership and society is quite pious and God-loving, while most of Ukrainian leadership is secular. Like in the communist times, Ukraine is run by atheists (communism was founded by atheist Jews, such as Marx, Trotsky, Lenin, etc.). In such milieu, more and more Ukrainians turn away from God, which has its consequences. While Ukrainian authorities make all kinds of PR stunts to gather and provide support, Russian Ministry of Defence publishes powerful videos[»]with religious content, praying, and blessed fighters defending their Motherland.
In this conflict, high priests from the local religion are on the Russian side, including the Ukrainian and Russian Orthodox Church Patriarch Kirill9[+] and the rest of the clergy[+][+][+], who bless[»] Russian soldiers and their equipment all the time while Ukrainian Orthodox Church priests do not bless but condemn[+] and curse[+] Ukraine's President Zelensky and his (we can only hope that is the correct pronoun[ꚛ][»][»]) regime. Make of that what you will. For the pious, this in itself is very telling about who is likely to be good and who is evil. Russian Orthodox priests have emphasized[+] the role of spiritual guidance in maintaining soldiers’ humanity during combat. By the way, Catholic Church Pope Francis didn't condemn[+] Russia over its role in the war in Ukraine, despite being pressured by the Western leaders to do so, nor did he condemn Ukraine (Russians never pressured or suggested him do such a thing).
Russian Orthodox Church is clearly NOT neutral but fully backing the Russian government. Actually, it might be the other way around because this seems to be Patriarch Kirill’s holy war since 2018 as explained in another article and its segment on spiritual warfare[*].
Pope Leo XIV
The Vatican’s Selective Outrage (With Extra Hypocrisy Sauce)
The Vatican’s position has been… complicated. They’ve talked a big game about neutrality while delivering the most uneven performance since a one-legged man in a kicking contest😊: strong language for Russian actions, noticeably quieter on Ukrainian ones (including the fun eight years in Donbas since 2014 with shelling, torture, religious persecution, church seizures, language bans, cultural suppression and general terrorizing of Russian minorities). It is like a referee who only blows the whistle on one team😊.
Offering Vatican City as “neutral ground” for talks while papal statements read like they were ghostwritten by Kyiv’s PR team is peak diplomatic comedy. It’s like claiming you’re an impartial referee while secretly wearing one team’s jersey under the black uniform. Clearly, the Vatican took Moscow for fools – only to reveal who the real fools are in this morality play.😊
They proudly claim “positive neutrality,” but it’s it is a straight-up lie, a glittering façade thinner than communion wafer😊. Former Pope Francis didn’t formally condemn[+] Russia despite heavy Western arm-twisting, and he didn’t condemn Ukraine either (Russians, to their credit, never pressured him). But new Pope Leo XIV has been far more enthusiastic about accusing[+] and criticizing[»] Russia of aggression — while staying strangely mute on Ukraine, Israel, or his own homeland the US and their various military adventures. Selective vocal cords, indeed.
late Pope Francis
Although late Pope Francis avoided an explicit Russia condemnation, he rolled out the heavy phrases – “war of aggression,” “senseless massacre,” “martyred Ukraine” – aimed exclusively at Russian actions, complete with Bucha condemnations[+] and appeals against Russian strikes. Ukrainian strikes and neo-Nazi terror since 2014? Crickets. The Vatican never bothered investigating much of anything; they simply mainlined NATO and Kyiv talking points while treating anything from Russia as automatic disinformation. Double standards so thick you could spread them on toast at a Pharisee brunch😊. There’s substantial evidence[*] debunking the “Bucha massacre” narrative as a hoax, yet the so-called Holy See chose team Kyiv without a single fact-check. Not neutral. Not holy. Just not. All in all, Vatican comments smell far more like NATO briefing notes than any whisper from the Holy Spirit.😊
Let there be no mistake or false expectations, Vatican is NOT neutral here, although they falsely claim they are. Endless pretense and posturing[+] aside, under both Francis and Leo XIV, the emphasis has been comically lopsided: criticize Russia loudly, Ukrainian slaughter[»][»][»] since 2014 get the diplomatic silent treatment. This is textbook selective outrage and double standards – the exact thing the Bible has strong opinions about:
“The LORD detests double standards; he is not pleased by dishonest scales.” – Proverbs 20:23[+]
“If any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask God, who gives generously to all without reproach, and it will be given him. But let him ask in faith, with no doubting, for the one who doubts is like a wave of the sea that is driven and tossed by the wind. For that person must not suppose that he will receive anything from the Lord; he is a double-minded man, unstable in all his ways.” – James 1:5-8[+]
Pre-2022 Donbas horrors – Kyiv regime’s neo-Nazi battalions slaughtering[»][»][»], terrorizing[»][»], torturing[+], and tyrannizing[+][+][+][+][+][+] (language restrictions in education/media, pension/social service blockades, economic isolation, displacement) the Russian minorities in Donbas – is well-documented by OSCE/UN reports, yet, the Vatican did not treat these with equivalent public outrage as post-2022 Russian actions. It is like the Vatican has a curious soft spot for certain historical flavors of extremism – remember Pius XII’s era and the cozy back channels[+] with Hitler, the post-war ratlines smuggling[+] Nazis to safety? Funny how selective silence on neo-Nazis in 2014–2022 Ukraine fits the pattern. Some traditions die hard😊.
If Francis left any doubt, Pope Leo XIV ripped the mask off completely. Vatican under both popes has never condemned Ukrainian war crimes like the repeated targeting of civilians[*]. Sympathy flows generously toward Ukrainian victims, but Russian victims of Ukrainian attacks? Radio silence. Double standards aren’t a great look for any institution claiming moral authority, especially one with its own extensive rap sheet of scandals. Catholic moral teaching is supposed to be universal. Applying it like a Wi-Fi signal – strong in Moscow’s direction, or nonexistent elsewhere – does invite questions about consistency. Jesus had strong words for that sort of thing. (See: Pharisees.)😊
Furthermore, it’s rich for Vatican and Catholic leaders to sit in judgment over Russia and Orthodox leaders and their actions and assume moral superiority, given their own track record of transgressions that should make them hide in shame: clerical sexual abuse scandals, financial corruption (hello, Vatileaks), cover-ups, proselytism[+], and uniatism[»], to name just a few. They even signed a 2016 Joint Declaration[+] condemning proselytism and uniatism – right before continuing business as usual, NATO-style, by meddling in Orthodox affairs in Ukraine. Especially rich is the Vatican’s enthusiastic support for Patriarch Bartholomew’s illegal transfer of Kyiv jurisdiction from Moscow to Constantinople[*]. Imagine if Moscow supported Patriarch Bartholomew’s transfer of Rome jurisdiction from Vatican to Constantinople! Would that be appropriate? If Rome can’t have Kyiv, it’ll happily help someone else steal it from Moscow. Most of the Orthodox world (not just Russia) called this ecclesiastical coup what it was: an outrageous power grab.
Patriarch Kirill…
Meanwhile, Patriarch Kirill and senior Russian Orthodox figures have never pounced on the Vatican’s endless scandals to launch incursions into Catholic territory or sow discord among Catholics. They didn’t kick the institution while it was down. The Vatican, however, showed no such courtesy to Russia. That tells you everything about who holds the higher moral ground. Simply put, the Vatican has no business playing referee in Orthodox family disputes, let alone appointing itself judge, jury, and biased commentator.
As the Vatican has issued no comparable strong, repeated condemnations of Kyiv’s actions against Russian minorities in Donbas ever since 2014, this demonstrates clear double standards that are not just glaring but lethal. People are literally dying as these people are pretending to be neutral and giving false hopes of resolving the conflict. Every word against Russia and for Ukrainian victims exposes their “neutrality” claims as pure PR spin coming less from divine revelation and more from binge-watching Western media.
If calling out Vatican for lying about its neutrality sounds too harsh, then so be it, if that is what it takes for you to take action instead of waiting for them to do what is right. Harsh words do not kill, deceitful words do. We cannot keep waiting for poser “neutral” mediators like Pope Leo or Trump to magically deliver peace. They are prolonging the misery with their games. All the virtue-signaling with stunts like “Solidarity with Ukraine” or “I stand with Ukraine” is not the righteous crusade it is sold as – the double standards and bias from our ruling classes are more deadly than any missile. Jesus had zero patience for Pharisees. We shouldn’t either.
A Catholic moral principle is supposed to be universal. Applying one standard to Russia and a completely different one to Ukraine, Israel, or the US is not theology – it’s hypocrisy with incense😊. Pope Leo XIV slams Russia with words like “imperialist” and “aggression” but goes mute on Ukrainian military and terrorist actions killing civilians and wrecking infrastructure in both countries. Same for American and Israeli operations. Identifying only Russia as the aggressor while giving others a free pass makes him look exactly like the Pharisees Jesus roasted on open flame. Such selective compassion is despicable and anti-Christian. Jesus saved His strongest language for hypocrites – He’s surely doing the same today.
From a Catholic moral-theology perspective, no military action becomes morally acceptable merely because Ukrainians/Israelis/Americans dos it. If a Catholic leader/scholar concluded that a particular Ukrainian/Israeli/American action intentionally killed innocents or constituted unjust conquest, he would have to condemn it under the same moral principles used elsewhere. What cannot be established simply by Catholic doctrine is that one side gets a permanent exemption from moral scrutiny. If the commandment against unjust killing applies, it applies universally. If the commandment against theft or unjust seizure applies, it applies universally. Catholic moral theory does not contain one set of commandments for Ukrainians/Israelis/Americans and another for Russians. Yet, here we are. Tell it to the Pope.
Ukrainian Orthodox Church itself is very critical of Kyiv regime that since 2014 has been slaughtering[»][»][»], torturing[+], terrorizing[»][»], and tyrannizing[+][+][+][+][+][+] the Russian minorities in Donbas – something no Pope has bothered condemning or calling it aggression. Pure hypocrisy! And no pope has condemned or said anything against Kyiv regime banning Ukrainian Orthodox Church, prosecuting[»] and persecuting[»][+][+][»] priests, confiscating[»][+][+][»][»], seizing[»], burning[»][»][»], attacking[❖][»][»][»], and demolishing[»][»][»] churches!!! Such unjust bias and hypocrisy by pope Leo XIV will surely not be rewarded by Jesus when the Day of Judgement comes. The Vatican’s and Pope’s restraint when dealing with Kyiv’s severe religious crackdowns is interpreted by critics not as diplomatic caution, but as a silent endorsement. They seems to love Kyiv regime for first splitting/weakening and then banning Orthodox Church, hoping Catholics then would take over, a Vatican’s centuries-long dream. The historical suspicion remains that Vatican quietly tolerates the fracturing of Eastern Orthodoxy in the hopes of expanding its own geopolitical and ecclesiastical footprint in the region. Therefore, ROC Patriarch Kirill views the defense of Orthodox canonical territory against Western secularism, Catholic expansionism and Istanbul’s (Constantinople’s) jurisdictional overreach as a spiritual necessity.
The Roman Catholic Church operates as a global entity with over a billion adherents but its and Pope’s moral authority has been severely damaged by decades of systemic internal scandals, including widespread clerical abuse. Yet it still lectures everyone else.
Pope Leo XIV offered[+] the Vatican as a neutral ground for Russia-Ukraine negotiations and declared[+] that the Vatican has been making efforts from day one to maintain a neutral position in the Russian–Ukrainian conflict. The pontiff acknowledged that some of his statements could have been interpreted in different ways (pro-Ukraine or anti-Russia) but emphasized the importance of the Vatican’s neutrality. Cute. But actions speak louder: criticizing only one side while staying silent on the Kyiv regime’s behavior turns “calculated neutrality” into a bald-faced lie – a deadly sin for a Pope, last time we checked😊. This selective compassion and asymmetric condemnation remain a clear example of institutional hypocrisy on steroids.
When Russian missiles hit civilian areas the Pope finds his voice. When Ukrainian drones and sabotage operations do the same? Gentle “sadness over escalation” and calls for dialogue. Pope Leo XIV directly named and blasted Russian escalation (e.g., during his April 2026 Angola visit) but applies no such direct fire to Ukrainian attacks. This lopsided blame game shatters any illusion of neutrality. The Vatican’s diplomacy under Pope Leo XIV isn’t reflecting the universal love of Christ – it’s reflecting alignment with Western narratives that shield Kyiv from accountability.
Further display of Pope’s hypocrisy is manifest in his approach to the rights of Ukrainian children. While the Vatican eagerly joins the West in accusing Russia of “unlawful deportations” while rescuing/evacuating orphans from the warzones, it remains largely silent on the well-documented trafficking and sexual exploitation of Ukrainian women and children heading West. Independent watchdogs and international investigative journalists have repeatedly sounded alarms for years. Focusing outrage only on children going east while ignoring those suffering in the West makes Vatican humanitarianism look less like compassion and more like a politically weaponized photo-op.
In the West and Ukraine, there is an exceedingly strong hatred-driven campaign against Russia, which is bundled with fear of Russia (Russophobia[+]) and incited far and wide to such an extreme that any trace of neutrality is immediately condemned as siding with “the evil”. All prominent people who cultivate the virtue of neutrality, defend national interests, or say anything positive about Russia or anything negative about Ukraine or NATO are being absurdly stigmatized[»] as psychopaths or pro-Russian, Kremlin trolls, Putin agents, Putinists, Russian proxies, Putin apologetics, stooges of Moscow, Kremlin propagandists,Kremlin assets, Putin’s servants, Russian spies, Kremlin mouthpieces, Russian shills, traitors and such, which is always meant as an insult and never based on any evidence of payment from or links to Russia but on mere opposition to the establishment’s narrative. What does that say about the state of democracy in the West? If peace activists got a penny for every time we were called “Putin agents”, we would be millionaires by now, probably sunning ourselves on a yacht ironically named ‘The Kremlin Troll’ 😊.
If peace activists got a penny for every time we were called any of such names, we would be millionaires by now but you know what? It backfired because after we, all the peace activists, have been called all kinds of nasty names by the Western establishment and their stooges on social media, we now know that then they surely also lie about calling others nasty names as well, such as dictator, butcher, war criminal, and such. And we invite you to also reconsider whether all that name-calling Putin and Russia as well as others (now and in the past) is really true or just a projection.
In the Western culture, anyone who doesn't hate Putin and Russians is treated as an outcast or even a criminal, which says a lot about the West being hatred-driven. Like in Nazi Germany when everyone was expected to hate and discriminate against the Jews. Discriminating against any nation is neo-Nazism and fascism. In their hateful frame of mind, Ukraine and its Western allies are not willing to find a solution to end this war that is based on objectivity and brokered by any neutral statesmen.
All attempts from neutral states such as Israel[+], Turkey[+][»], China[+], Brazil[+][+], Indonesia[+], African coalition[+][+], and the Vatican[+][+][+] to broker a peace deal have been blatantly rejected by both Kyiv and Washington while Moscow rejected no peace initiative (other than Zelensky's pseudo “peace formula”[+], which Russia perceives as stupid, schizophrenic, and delusional or unrealistic featuring ultimatums for Russia to capitulate[+][+]). By a decree[+][+][+], Zelensky even banned peace talks with Moscow. Moscow is ready for talks on Ukraine, which would take the situation on the ground (Russian military victories in line with indigenous people's right to self-determination) and Russian security interests (denazification and no NATO in neutral Ukraine) into account[+]. Kyiv and NATO disregard both the reality on the ground and Russian security concerns, which is why they enable Russians to proceed with enforcing their legitimate interests and their right to defend them by military means.
Ukraine's neutrality is Russia's main and legitimate demand[+], therefore there can be no peace until NATO and Kyiv stop declaring how Ukraine's place is in NATO. For peace and stability in Europe, Ukraine needs to remain a neutral buffer zone between two antagonistic superpowers, NATO and Russia.
The West went as far as to command, demand, or coerce nonaligned world leaders to abandon their neutral stance threatening them with all kinds of sanctions and threats, and insinuating them being immoral sinners[+][+] for not condemning alleged evil.
For instance, in April 2022, the US government sponsored a political coup[»] and prosecution[+] against Pakistan's democratically elected Prime Minister Imran Khan[»] due to his non-aligned foreign policy and neutrality in the Ukraine war.
It is against human rights and civil liberties to coerce anyone, much less the whole nations, to take a side in a conflict and so drag them into it making them suffer severe consequences. Every human being and a state have every right to stay neutral[+] or non-aligned. It is also against the constitutional rights of the members of the Non-Aligned Movement to coerce them to align with Ukraine.
Non-Aligned Movement (NAM)[+] is a forum of 120 countries that are not formally aligned with or against any major power bloc. After the United Nations, it is the largest grouping of states worldwide. It was established in 1961 (in Belgrade, Yugoslavia) through an initiative of Yugoslav President Josip Broz Tito (who was the first Chair of NAM), Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser, Ghanaian President Kwame Nkrumah, and Indonesian President Sukarno. The current Chair is Ilham Aliyev, President of Azerbaijan. The purpose of the organization was summarized by Fidel Castro as to ensure "the national independence, sovereignty, territorial integrity and security of non-aligned countries" in their "struggle against imperialism, colonialism, neo-colonialism, racism, and all forms of foreign aggression, occupation, domination, interference or hegemony as well as against great power and bloc politics." The movement has been outspoken in its criticism of current UN structures and power dynamics, and advocating for the reforming of the United Nations Security Council[+], stating that it has been used by powerful states in ways that violate the movement's principles. The movement accepts the universality of human rights and social justice but fiercely resists cultural homogenization[+] appealing for the protection of cultural diversity, and the tolerance of the religious, socio-cultural, and historical particularities that define human rights.
In other words, non-alignment or neutrality is a commendable feat cultivated by most of the countries in the world, which the West has no right to trample, especially given that the West is notorious for being immoral[»][»][»][»][»][»], malicious[+], oppressive[+], aggressive[ꚛ][ꚛ][+][+], arrogant[»][+], and other attributes that are closer to evil than good. Nevertheless, they do it even disgracefully overtly[+][»][+].
Yet, in a joint event at the Munich Security Conference[+][»] on 18 February 2023, the warmongering foreign ministers of the US, Germany, and Ukraine told the world, “Neutrality is not an option” in the West’s proxy war against Russia, implicitly criticizing the vast majority of Global South countries that are neutral[+][+]and members of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM)[+]. Western leaders have been affirming that they are seeking allies in their war against Russia and telling the rest of the world “You can’t be neutral” in the Ukraine war: “You are either with us or against us”[+] recalling President G. W. Bush’s infamous declaration[+] (in the context of GWOT10[+]). It’s the geopolitical equivalent of 'Are you coming to my party? If not, we're not friends anymore!' – very mature 😊.
Russians, on the other hand, have never demanded or coerced any world leaders to abandon their neutrality. Quite the opposite. For instance, they demand Ukraine to be a neutral state (not to join either NATO or CSTO11[+] military alliance), although they would have every right to demand their fellow Eastern Slavs12 to ally with them (and Belarus and other post-Soviet states), which would be most natural regarding ethnic, ancestral, traditional, linguistic, historical, and economic ties.
There are also many NATO states politicians calling for neutrality[»], including some Members of the European Parliament such as Clare Daly, Mick Wallace, and Manuel Pineda, along with many more across the Atlantic. However, their voices have been largely suppressed and absent in mainstream media. Thanks to the internet, they manage to come through.
Forcing nations out of neutrality or non-alignment into picking a side may be compared to choosing a religion. Christians invaded many countries and killed billions of people throughout history, does that mean Christianity and Christ are evil? Then why is this logic applied to Russians?
The debate on neutrality can be ended with a single point: if, according to NATO leaders, “neutrality is not an option” and “states can’t be neutral” in the armed conflict in Ukraine, then the same should apply also to all the other countries at war[+][+] such as Syria, Myanmar, Ethiopia, Sudan, Yemen, Israel, etc. but for some reason, NATO officials are not urging the world leaders to abandon neutrality in all those wars, which exposes their double standards again. Following what they preach, all NATO countries should also not be then neutral in all those other wars in the world but are all NATO countries sanctioning all the other world invaders and sending weapons to all those nations that are victims of aggression? If not, then they are hypocrites while preaching what they don't do. Moreover, why didn't those NATO officials urge the world not to be neutral from the beginning of the war in 2014 when Ukrainians were the aggressors slaughtering[»][»][»], torturing[+], terrorizing[»][»], and tyrannizing[+][+][+][+][+][+]millions of innocent civilians in Eastern Ukraine? Think about that.
Globalists’ and NATO ideology “if you are not with us, you are against us”[+] is based on bivalent logic[+][+] and exploited to generate polarization, reject non-partisanship, and gain allies. The implied consequence of not joining the partisan effort of the speakers is to be deemed an enemy. Only when the speaker is Jesus or some saint or high priest, and when there are no alternatives like a middle ground[+] does that phrase hold validity, thus, neither Zelensky nor his (we can only hope that is the correct pronoun[ꚛ][»][»]) allies have the right to demand bias or to condemn neutrality. In their context, that phrase renders neutrality as a sin[+][+] – they condemned it and present it even as evil (not opposing alleged evil is deemed as evil). However, neutrality is a virtue, a constructive mode of consciousness1[+], which allows constructive, objective peace mediation and negotiation.
As seen on the scale of consciousness[ꚛ], neutrality is valued at 250 log while rivalry is at 185, and inconsiderateness, assuming moral superiority (arrogance, conceit), making threats, and intimidation are even lower – the threshold between constructive and destructive modes of consciousness (virtues and flaws) is at 200, whereby everything above 200 is constructive and a virtue while everything below 200 is destructive and a flaw. Note that neutrality is not one of the highest modes of consciousness but it is certainly higher than prejudice, bias, one-sidedness, discrimination, hatred, rivalry, or any other destructive modes, and it may serve as a stepping stone on the route to one of the highest modes of consciousness – peace.
In times of international conflict, neutrality has often paid off handsomely in material advantage and prevention of loss of life. In areas where moral and spiritual values are concerned, according to some Christian teachers[+], neutrality is deemed to be a twilight zone of irresponsibility that plays directly into the hands of evil, but who is evil in this conflict – the West or East? Moreover, who has the authority to judge who is good and who is evil in this conflict between NATO-backed Ukraine and Russia? Christian doctrine condemns judging[+] but if we are forced to judge, then we should be able to do it on our own without any coercion from any sinners. Who are NATO and Ukraine to tell[+] us they are good and Russia is evil?! Are they God's representatives on the Earth? They justify their demand on the fact that Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, but Ukraine did it first in 2014 (attacking Russian ethnic minorities in Donbas[+] for many years, killing thousands of civilians) and NATO has been invading countries and killing people all the time, thus their justification doesn't have a leg to stand on.
When Jesus said, “Whoever is not with me is against me,” (Bible, Matthew 12:30[+] and Luke 11:23[+]), he never condemned neutrality or demanded that anyone should join him or be against anyone let alone kill or harm others (he was all for turning the other cheek[+]). That quote was uttered in the context of division in a kingdom while he was being suspected to be the son of a demon (the Son of Beelzebub rather than David) because he was able to drive demons out of people. Jesus explained the contest between Satan and Christ or the Holy Spirit – in other words, how darkness can't drive out darkness, only light can do that. So, when “darkness” comes, we choose either to switch on the light or not; there is no other neutral option. In this sense, this non-neutrality applies to dark places such as Ukraine (people there need to switch on the light inside themselves or keep living in the dark) but not the whole world, otherwise, all countries should be expected to engage in every single war on the planet[+][+], not just in Ukraine. This is not what pacifist Jesus meant, just as he didn't mean that all non-Christians are against him just because they are not with him. Also, not everyone's job is to judge or expel evil, therefore, not all countries’ leaders are obliged to do it unless their people are “possessed” by demons.
No one is essentially evil; people are not inherently evil, as all human beings are God's children. Some forces might be evil but not people themselves. People may be possessed by evil forces, which is evident from their agitated behavior, and such souls should be helped rather than forsaken. All of us have a good and evil side in ourselves; no one is innocent or pure evil. Stonewalling or judging or condemning any God's children as if they are nothing but sinners or evil is itself sinful, so to all those who are assuming moral superiority over others, we appeal to their conscience using Jesus's wise words: "Let anyone among you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at…Russians/the West"[+], “Do not judge, or you too will be judged”, “Do not resist the one who is evil”[+], and “Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you… Do to others as you would have them do to you.”[+]
The West's vilifying of neutrality has pushed most of the world's leaders to side with Russia. NATO leaders made the mistake of roaring at national leaders with slogans such as “If you are not with us, you are against us” and “You can’t be neutral” because most of those leaders then responded something to the effect: “Well then, if we are not allowed to be neutral, then we are against you because you have been mean to us.” Most countries in the world have bad experiences with NATO countries, many considering them even as evil, whereas they have good experiences with Russia. The rest of the World is not buying the Western narrative about this war because they understand that Russia had a good reason to take the action that it did and that they have been provoked into doing it. Very much like many other insubordinate, smart leaders, if anyone coerces us to abandon our neutrality, we would take their inconsiderateness, arrogance, threats, and intimidation as a sign of immorality or malevolence and therefore pick the other side.
This NATO's hostile approach to neutrality has had a severe backlash with countries abandoning neutrality to take the Russian side, as well as the Chinese side (in the US conflict with China over Taiwan and beyond). So, when NATO heads realized that, they started to take costly measures to bring some powerful countries back to neutrality.
For instance, with India when in June 2023, India's PM Modi – a man who just a few years ago was vilified and denied entry to the United States – had to be “bribed” or enticed with a long list of concessions and packages spanning defense, trade, aid to increase renewable energy (because it is in the US interest that India buys less gas from Russia, fueling Russian economy), and other emerging technology, such as investment to turn India into a semiconductor powerhouse (as US is encouraging American chipmakers to decrease their dependence on China). Also, the US was obligated to solve issues of visa renewal for India's immigrants in the US, as well as return many embezzled India’s artifacts and antiquities.[+]
To foster neutrality as a way to end this horrific war, we put together this neutrality-minded, wisdom-driven peace initiative that is not just informative but transformational. The reason why this peace initiative is transformational is that it offers the truth that will set everyone free. Everyone believes they know the truth about Russia, Ukraine, and other involved nations (the US and other NATO members) but if their truth is hatred-driven, unconstructive, detrimental, or toxic, then you can be sure that it is not the truth.
The ultimate truth is neutral. It is neutral because it is not partial or one-sided and because it is void of egoistic opinion and judgment, also because it is aligned with the universal law of polarity, which regulates the balanced interaction of positive and negative qualities in nature, including the nature of men. And above all, truth is neutral because it is rooted in Oneness and beyond a dualistic worldview.
We should always be truthful, but what is truthful for one group of people, is not truthful to others, because most humans have no clear means of distinguishing the truth from lies due to personal impurity. The lack of transparency, disinformation, misinformation, propaganda, and deception are other major impediments to knowing the truth. Objectivity is a tool for seeking the truth. But it is almost impossible to be objective when you are in a conflict and when you rely only on information from the propaganda-driven media and hearsay.
The role of journalists is to tell facts and truth as they see it, which is often not as it really is. Being susceptible to business pressures, media organizations mostly favor sensationalized, taken-out-of-context, and even inaccurate stories. Many reporters prey upon delegitimizing certain public figures, as they need the polarization or interplay of good and evil notables to keep up the dynamics needed to make stories interesting, marketable, and commercial. And if there are not enough evil guys to construct a money-making plot, then they need to invent them.
However, many other reporters are genuine truth-seekers. However, still they are mostly biased on the issues they report and that is okay in journalism. The same applies to politicians, lawyers, and activists – they need to be partial to balance the unstable or crooked state of affairs, or to make things change for the better, especially if the status quo is itself inclined in the other direction.
For instance, a woman activist could never be neutral or objective on women's inequality issues and it would not serve any purpose to be neutral. She should never draw false moral equivalence and would need to be subjective to make a difference.
Peacemakers, on the other hand, can’t afford to be biased, preferential, partisan, subjective, one-sided, or opinionated. They need a genuine stance of objectivity and neutrality to be able to appeal to both sides to make peace. Peacemakers who assume moral superiority over a party in conflict are doomed to fail.
They don't need to show courage in expressing their views on issues at hand or have the willingness to confront “the evil” because peacemaking is not about them at all and it is also not about issues but about making peace. The apparent issues are never real issues.
When peacemakers are initially biased about an issue and then for the sake of peacemaking efforts make an effort to be objective and neutral, mostly it’s disingenuous and therefore usually ineffective. Neutrality or rather neutralness is a mode of consciousness1[+], a virtue, rather than an agenda.
As peacemakers, we need to overcome the notion that our own opinions and positions are worth entertaining if we are ever going to get to a place where we truly may facilitate the conditions for peacemaking, and where both conflicted sides feel confident placing their trust in our abilities to run good mediation and fair stewardship. We have to earn our trust and respect by giving equal time to both sides. Who are we to judge who are really the bad guys anyway?! No one is innocent, there is a bad side in all of us, as well as a good side in all those whom most people perceive as the bad guys.
Hatred and oppression can’t be uprooted from “the bad guys” by disrespectfully treating them as the bad guys – this only justifies and reinforces their hatred of us. By showing respect, fairness, neutralness, open-mindedness, and compassion to hateful beings, it is possible to even convert them to that which we call “light” and refers to anything constructive. It is inhumane to treat any human inhumanely. All people who treat others with hatred or any other type of hostility are inhumane, whatever the excuse. If we inhumanely treat those whom we deem inhumane, how are we any better than them?!
Being neutral doesn’t mean being untruthful, as some might see it. Being neutral is more about being open-minded and fair. In situations in which there is a lack of moral equivalence, neutrality can be maintained by inquiring about the causes of the immorality of those who inflict harm on others. By digging deep enough, we often find that on the whole, there is actually moral equivalence. The perceived innocents often turn out not to be as innocent as they seem or as they present themselves to be.
While being neutral and objective, it is permissible for peacemakers to state truthful, objective facts. This doesn’t diminish their neutrality. On the whole, peacemakers are still neutral, even if they are pointing out the facts in favor of one or the other side throughout the peacemaking process. It is all about tipping the scales here and there while keeping the main goal in mind, which is making peace. In other words, at times it will seem that the propositions in this peace initiative are in favor of one side or the other, which is needed for a truthful or factful presentation of arguments but overall, when adding it all up, the pros and the contras, it is a neutral peace initiative, not favoring one or the other side. That is why it is important to read it all to the end, otherwise, it is possible to come to totally wrong conclusions.
This truce proposal relies on an extensive apparatus of secondary sources such as peer-reviewed monographs and articles and tertiary sources such as analyses and media sources.
In this peace initiative, we present the only solution to end the war in Ukraine in the shortest time possible. One that no one else has proposed. A novel approach to end wars, as well as to prevent them. This solution is based on raising collective consciousness[+] from the modes of rivalry and animosity to the mode of neutrality and then to peace. It is simple and doable.
People who are so deeply rooted in hatred towards everything Russian or Putin, so-called Russophobes, a neutral position such as ours may be perceived and condemned as apologetic towards an alleged “evil regime”, which would be false. Haters pose a danger to world peace and we are not here to serve or support them.
To be able to perceive truth, it is important to distance yourself from the one-sided information you might have been bombarded with and that might have indoctrinated you, robbing you of objectivity and neutrality. This is why, for this peace initiative, we took time to carry out complex research and shed some light on the state of current affairs and the route the participants are heading. The route to peace is paved with virtues[ꚛ]. Hopefully, this wisdom-driven peace initiative will inspire you to take that route, to activate and cultivate your virtues of fairness, objectiveness, neutrality, wisdom...
In a sea of subjective assessments floating all around the media space, we aim to provide an objective account of all the grounds supporting this peace initiative. For that reason, we are offering none of our irrelevant opinions but giving you the data so that you can draw your own conclusions. If we happen to express our opinion and we do not provide evidence or an external link to evidence, you are free to ignore it. It is not our job to express our opinions or tell anyone what to do but we see it as our duty to lay out the facts for this peace initiative so that a fact-based truce can be achieved sooner rather than later and many lives could be saved.
Bottom line:Neutrality isn’t cowardice or moral failure. It’s refusing to let professional warmongers and propagandists rent space in your head for free. If more people had kept clear eyes and cool heads, thousands of lives on both sides might have been spared. That’s not pro-Russia or anti-Ukraine. That’s just pro-reality, pro-peace, and pro-humanity 😊. Time to wake up, raise consciousness, and end this madness ourselves.
Alternative: Choosing The Right Side
For those who maintain that neutrality is rather a flaw if they are led to strongly believe that this war is a battle between good and evil, we invite them to activate critical thinking and free-thinking capabilities to reconsider who is evil here, if anyone at all. Throughout much of this wisdom-driven peace initiative, which is aimed mostly at pro-Ukrainian audiences, we provide much evidence to prove that NATO and Ukrainians are not the good guys that they claim to be and that Russians are not evil. If invading another country were “evil”, then the US would be the evilest country in the world, as it has invaded more countries than anyone else in recent human history.
Currently, the US is illegally occupying Syria and several other African nations (Sudan, Niger…), whose governments do not want them there, not to mention all the previous illegal US military occupations (Iraq, Afghanistan, Haiti, Panama, Grenada), thus they are worse than Russians. Whenever Russia has militarily intervened in a country, it was only because the local government of that country has requested it (including in Ukraine, Crimean and Donbas authorities requested Russia's intervention), while the US and some other its NATO allies intervene by supporting anti-government aggressive rebels – a huge difference, proving that NATO intervenes to overthrow the legal governments and install their puppets so as to steal their natural resources, like Trump admitted it here[»][»]. Interesting how the West loves "rebels" when they're in Syria but hates rebels when they're from Donbas🤔
➡ For instance, we will lay out plenty of undeniable evidence that it was not Russia but NATO-puppet Kyiv regime that invaded first, as everyone, including NATO leaders and Zelensky admitted that the war started not in February 2022 (by Russia) but in 2014[*] (by Ukraine). It was Kyiv that sent its troops to the Donbas region with ethnic Russians in April 2014[»] to kill[»][»][»], torture[+], terrorize[»][»], and tyrannize[+][+][+][+][+][+] them (because they protested against the new undemocratically self-appointed, anti-Russian, revolutionary government that came to power by force backed by the US and the EU) and by the time Russia sent its troops in 2022, Kyiv has already killed almost 14.000 civilians there. If invading and killing civilians is a measure to call someone evil, then Kyiv regime fits the profile.
➡ We will also lay out many of already officially debunked lies from both NATO and Kyiv authorities (both from governments[*] and media[*]) proving that they are untrustworthy. You may not think that lying in itself is evil but the amount of lying and the topics of lying may make you think twice, so make sure to find that out. If you think, so what, Putin and Russians are lying too, brace yourself for a paradigm shift as we will debunk[*] all major allegations of Putin lying. No doubt, Russians do engage in some war propaganda but no more than NATO leaders do. Even if you still believe that Putin is a liar, that is beside a point, because the main point here is that Zelensky, Biden, and Co. lie, too, which is why this is not a basis to decide one side is good and other is evil.
➡ If your judgement of who is good and who evil rests upon on the valuation of democracy = good, autocracy = evil, then you need to do a research to find out which country is more democratic, Ukraine or Russia. Our research has shocked us and it may shock you to find out[*] that Russia is much more democratic than Ukraine.
➡ But perhaps these two videos[»][»] show the best which side in this conflict is more evil or at least not “the good guys”, so make sure to watch them:
“America Angry As Russia Leaks Classified Files About Gaddafi’s Murder”:
If you strongly believe you must side with one or the other rather than stay neutral, here we offer arguments for siding with one or the other side with the aim of ending the horrific war in Ukraine by means of raising awareness and consciousness rather than military means. Considering Russia's military superiority and realities on the battlefields, ending this war by military means signifies ending it completely on Russian terms and with huge casualties, losses, and destruction, which is why we propose to end it by other means before it is too late.
Ukrainians and their NATO masters are too proud or too delusional to admit they have been defeated already in 2022, which is why they prolong this war and only we, the public, can put a stop to it before it is too late (Ukraine gets wiped off the map and nuclear war escalation). While Russia and Ukraine were ready to sign a peace deal already in March 2022, pressured by his NATO masters, Zelensky backed off from it and even issued a decree in September 2022 prohibiting any peace negotiation with Russia, therefore rejecting all peace initiatives proposed by various world leaders.
The lack of regard for human life by Kyiv regime and their backers, the globalists, is based on their depopulation agenda[+] that derives from the belief that the planet is overpopulated and especially overpopulated with their enemies who also pollute the planet. Ukraine has always been categorized[+] as part of “the developing countries” that allegedly needed to be depopulated, which they also achieved – since 1991 independence, population almost halved from almost 52 million to now 30 million, according to Zelensky in January 2024[+] and Wikipedia.
The genocide in Ukraine started in 1991. When they left USSR. 30 million people lost in 30 years. Who did it?
A depopulation agenda[+] of the globalists (WEF, Bilderberg[+]…) dates from the Club of Rome’s[»][+][+] landmark 1972 report The Limits to Growth[+] followed by the US Memorandum 200[+][+], signed in 1974 under the President Nixon administration during the Cold War, adopting an “agenda of enforcing human population control in order to prevent the global spread of communism” and “to limit the political power of undeveloped nations, ensure the easy extraction of foreign natural resources, prevent young anti-establishment individuals from being born and to protect American businesses abroad from interference from nations seeking to support their growing populations.”[+] The Memorandum was prepared by a group led by Henry Kissinger (then-US Secretary of State 1973-1977) warning about the threats of worldwide population growth for US security and overseas interests and declaring depopulation in the so-called Third World13 as a major strategic task of the US. An official statement from Henry Kissinger regarding the depopulation of the Third World: "a lessening of population…, population policy becomes relevant to resource supplies and to the economic interests of the United States."
Co-chairman[+] of the World Economic Forum (WEF), BlackRock CEO, Larry Fink confirms[»] their depopulation agenda by explaining how the goal of it is to make it easier to substitute human labor with AI.
The most peculiar is the fact that depopulation in Europe is occurring only in Eastern Europe – mostly by Slavs! Have a look at this evidence[ꚛ] showing population change in Europe and adjacent countries since the collapse of the socialist bloc until the beginning of the SMO – why are Slavs being depopulated and who is behind this Nazi-like agenda? According to the stats, since the socialist bloc fell, Slavs are vanishing faster than footprints in a sandstorm🥴. How globalist Jesuits (a.k.a. Fremasons, Illuminati, etc.) are behind the depopulation as well as the war in Ukraine and how all roads lead to Rome (Jesuits HQ) is explained in a separate conspiracy blockbuster here[*].
Epstein files revealed how a disgusting German cognitive scientist & AI researcher Joscha Bach sent email[+] to Jewish pedophile and child trafficker Jeffrey Epstein discussing depopulation methods: “climate change is a good way of dealing with overpopulation... forest fire... potentially a good thing for the species. Making having children expensive in terms of upbringing… strong reductions in population will come from large-scale failure of agriculture…”
If you want proof that they’re nuts, here it is[+]: They are saying that having a pregnant wife and “3 nice white babies” is fascist now.
While standing by Ukraine is already well-established proposition, we don’t need to provide here any additional justification for it. However, to that, we wish to point out that solidarity for Ukraine should not mean contributing to their loss of lives and territories, as this is exactly what so-called solidarity has led to. Sending weapons might feel like solidarity, but it's a bit like sending matches to someone stuck in a burning building 😊. Providing Ukraine with weapons is not solidarity for Ukraine but it is weapons for Ukraine. Arming Ukraine only prolongs their suffering and increases their casualties and other losses, including the loss of evermore territories. An earlier peace deal would have saved hundreds of thousands of lives, allowed refugees to return to their homes or homeland, and prevented further destruction and loss of more territories, which is why pushing for peace is a true meaning of solidarity for Ukraine.
Western politicians turn grinding Ukraine War into a political show. Cartoon: Carlos Latuff
Ukraine would be much better off by being in Russian rather than Western sphere of influence – Russia's economy is much better than that of the EU, UK, and US, as evidenced by statistics from Western sources. The predatory US, UK, and EU are in decline while Russia is on the rise. Ukraine would be better off if it aligned itself with fellow Eastern Slavs also because they share the same values, history, and ancestors, and will be able to progress more by harnessing the power from their roots.
👉 Here is the list of type of people who should side with either Russia or Ukraine/NATO, if they still believe that neutrality is not an option:
✅ All the people who disagree with American or Western ultraliberal values, rules, and laws such as allowing kids to change their gender without parents’ consent, allowing pervert men to use women toilets, locker rooms and shelters[+] by simply claiming they identify as a woman, allowing men to compete in women's sports so that women have no chance of winning, and many other similar policies may want to side with Russia and those who agree with ultraliberal values may want to side with Ukraine/NATO. Basically, if your idea of a good time doesn't involve pronoun debates in the sauna, Moscow might be calling 😊. People (including Ukrainians) who do not want all that should side with a new world order in which Russia and China increase their sphere of influence because they prevent the Western hegemony and unipolar world. Moscow positioned itself as a bastion of strength in a world gone mad[»][»][»][»][»][ꚛ][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][ꚛ][ꚛ], preserving traditional values.
“A time will come when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him, saying, ‘you are mad, you are not like us.’” - St. Anthony the Great
✅ All true Christians may side with Russia while others may side with Ukraine & NATO. Russians stand by Christian values while Ukrainians and many Westerners devalue Christian teachings by promoting anti-Christian agenda such as a ‘gender-neutral’ God, same-sex marriages, homosexuality, hedonism, narcissism, promiscuity, perversity, adultery, idolizing money and material values, usury, greed, gluttony, depravity, decadence, etc. Also, as we explain in another article[*], Jewish Kyiv regime (Zelensky, Head of the Office of the President Yermak, ex-Prime, Defense Minister Shmyhal, Kyiv mayor Klitschko…) prosecutes[»] the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, persecutes[»][+][+][»], confiscates[»][+][+][»][»], seizes[»], burns[»][»][»], attacks[ꚛ][»][»][»], and demolishes[»][»][»] churches(nothing to do with the war), occupies them to film such inappropriate things as culinary shows[+] there or as a platform for godless Jews like Zelensky to promote a personality cult[+] of Zelensky who posed there on the priest’s podium preaching his (we can only hope that is the correct pronoun[ꚛ][»][»]) own gospel (warmongering propaganda)… has often disrespectfully criticized[+][+] Pope Francis using strong language. Also, many Ukrainians reproached the Pope for suggesting peacenegotiations[+][»] calling him all sorts of vulgar names[+], such as “stupid c*nt”, “a**hole”, “Putin's bootlicker”, “anti-Christ”, a "communist's puppet" and such! Frankly, no idea how any self-respecting Christian may support Kyiv regime and Ukrainians after that. Also, Zelensky disrespected Pope Francis during private audiences at the Vatican in May 2023 and June 2024. He blatantly rejected Pope’s proposal to mediate peace talks, gave him an icon with a missing Jesus[+][ꚛ], sat down before Pope did[ꚛ][»] (a gross violation of the protocol), and showed up in a T-shirt[ꚛ][ꚛ] (but he put on a suit for neo-Nazi paramilitaries[ꚛ] as if he respects them more than the Pope) with a Nazi emblem[+][ꚛ]. He also showed him disrespect at his funeral as he was the only one among all the dignitaries who showed up in shirt[ꚛ] rather than a suit – there is no excuse for breaking funeral dress code[ꚛ].
In December 2022, while still working at US Fox News, Tucker Carlson accused Volodymyr Zelensky of waging a “war against Christianity”
✅ People who want to be allowed to buy inexpensive Chinese cars, mobile phones and other gadgets, instead of being forced (through bans and tariffs) to buy overpriced American, German, British, and French goods – such people should also prefer a new world order in which Russia and China increase their sphere of influence. Did you know that, for instance, the same quality EW car like Tesla (that costs over $40.000) from China (BYD) costs just $10.000?! But in the West, we are not allowed to buy it. Apparently, protecting us from affordable electric cars is a key pillar of Western security 😊. The same applies to many other things like Huawei phones and other gadgets that are banned in the West. Do you think your government has the right to deprive you of inexpensive goods and force you to buy overpriced goods from Western billionaires making them richer and you poorer? If you are forced to buy many things double or triple the price, then you are poorer because of it.
✅ People who agree that Russia has the right to denazify Ukraine – in a separate article on Russian demand of Denazification[*], we will offer plenty of evidence of Ukraine being No.1 hub of neo-Nazis in the world and as such a threat to Europe and humanity but as a starter, we offer a small video collection[»] as a proof.
✅ People who want to be allowed to benefit from Russian culture[+] – in the current world order, Western public is deprived of having an (easy) access to Russian literature, music, movies, shows, fashion, news, etc. because the Western governments block or censor most of the content coming from Russia, allowing only from those who are anti-government, which has no value.
Thank you for reading this article and participating in this peace initiative by raising your awareness and, hopefully, your consciousness and spirit. To grasp everything as intended, we[*]recommend reading the articles of this peace initiative for Ukraine in the order that we designed it, which is listed in the Contents. So if you haven’t read the previous articles, we recommend that you do. When you are ready, please proceed to the next article in this series: This Is Not A Real War
The Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO)[+] is an intergovernmental military alliance in Eurasia consisting of six post-Soviet states: Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, and Tajikistan, formed in 2002.
Consciousness is not mere awareness or wakefulness but a subtle dimension of who we are, which is the primary cause of everything that happens to us; when raised, it is a constructive force that creates everything in our life, helps us make the right decisions as well as come up with the best ideas and solutions. It is a primordial cause and fundamental force or source of creation.
Human consciousness expresses itself in a variety of modes throughout each day (as presented on an arbitrary scale of consciousness[+]), constructive and destructive ones (virtues and flaws), and the approximate average of the values of all these modes each person or a collective or a nation engages in throughout each day, amounts to what we call a level of consciousness. Consciousness Theorem[+], the level of collective consciousness determines the level of collective achievement. In other words, the higher the consciousness level of a nation, the higher its ability to achieve its goals, including peace.
Mediation is a structured, interactive process where an impartial third party neutrally assists disputing parties in resolving conflict through the use of specialized communication and negotiation techniques.
we refer to Kyiv as a regime[+] due to its oppressive and repressive policies, corruption, and foul treatment of its ethnic minorities, such as the ethnic Russians, violating their human rights, tyrannizing, and killing them since 2014.
Poroshenko is a Bandera[+] (Nazi collaborator in WWII whose troops massacred around 100.000 civilians, mostly Jews, Poles, and Roma) follower and adheres to ideology that is the same as or akin to Nazi ideology. He believes Ukrainian race or folk is superior to Russian and like WWII Nazis who were against Jews and Slavs, so is Poroshenko, like all Nazi and neo-Nazi Bandera followers, assuming superiority and hostility towards Russians openly ever since 2014. Just like Bandera, who had openly stated[+] that both Jews and Poles had no place in a sovereign Ukrainian state, Poroshenko openly stated that ethnic Russians had no place in a sovereign Ukrainian state and, moreover, that there is no place for nationalities in Ukraine[+]. As a scientific Brill and OSCE study[+] (by political and policy analyst and human rights advocate, OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities) reports, he pursued a policy of ‘nationalizing’ (Ukrainizing) minorities. He pushed the narrative that the political support to minority languages and improving the status of the state language are mutually exclusive and irreconcilable aims, thereby justifying his violations of human linguistic rights with his anti-ethnic minorities laws and reforms. Needless to say, by disregarding inclusivity and human linguistic rights, with such a polarized minority agenda forcing a single shared language, this ultranationalist president divided rather than united the country. Just as Nazis attempted to cultivate what they viewed as a "purified and homogeneous Aryan population," this is exactly what Poroshenko and later Zelensky regime attempted to do with their anti-ethnic minorities laws (2019 language law and 2017 education law, including banning Russian language in 30 spheres of life in a country in which 30%[+] of people – 14,3 million people declared Russian as their native language in the last national census; 8,3 million[+] of them identified as ethnic Russians – 17.3% of the population of Ukraine) – to Ukrainize or cultivate purified and homogeneous Ukrainian population, which involved ethnic cleansing and extermination of the most powerful ethno-linguistic minority – ethnic Russians whom they called “terrorists” and shelled them and discriminated against them for 8 years before Putin sent his troops in 2022 to rescue them. According to Wikipedia[+], Neo-Nazis employ their ideology to promote hatred and racial (including ethnic) supremacy, to attack racial and ethnic minorities, and in some cases to create a fascist state. This is exactly what hatred-driven Kyiv regime became since Poroshenko and Zelensky came to power assuming supremacy over ethnic Russians and attacking them while glorifying Nazi Bandera.
· Poroshenko used[+] the commemoration of Bandera and his OUN/UPA to try and pit ethnic Ukrainians against the Russian-speaking minority and its political parties.
· Poroshenko government’s support of a pro-fascist agenda is evident[+] in many street renamings replacing the former names with those of the Ukrainian Nazis Bandera and Shukhevich; erecting a monument to the Nazi collaborator Teliga in Babi Yar, the site of the mass execution of Kyiv Jews in 1941-1943; and, of course, the frequent torchlight processions by followers of Bandera.
· On 23 October 2014, then-President Poroshenko said[+]: "…Odesa is even called 'Banderovo'. And there is no greater compliment for Odesa for me!"
· On 23 October 2014, Poroshenko gave a notoriously bombastic neo-Nazi Hitler-like speech[»][»][»] in which he declared Nazi-like apartheid policies threatening to oppress and discriminate against children and civilians of ethnic Russians in Donbas (worse than Hitler did with the Jews): "We will have a job – they won't. We will have pensions – they won't. We will have the support of people – children and pensioners – but they won't. Our children will go to schools and kindergartens, and they will sit in their basements. Because they don't know how to do anything! That's how, that's how we will win this war." He was referring to the Civil War in Donbas 2014-2022[+][+][+] that he conducted with his anti-Russian policies and sending neo-Nazi battalions to Donbas to kill and terrorize[»][»] ethnic Russian civilians who protested his anti-Russian policies. This “beacon of democracy” clearly didn't know that first, second, and third duty of democracy is freedom for all.
· In May 2015, in favor of all things Bandera, Poroshenko signed a law[+][+] that gave the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists - Ukrainian Insurgent Army (OUN-UPA, who collaborated with the Nazis in 1940s executing ethnic cleansing and massacres of perceived subhumans such as Jews, Slavs, Gypsies, gays, etc.) the honorary status of "fighters for independence" of Ukraine and its participants the right to social security, making it also a crime to “publicly exhibit a disrespectful attitude” toward the OUN or UPA (Nazi collaborators in WWII), and in December 2018, he gave those original Banderites (1.201 people) a full recognition and the status of veterans[+][+]. , and in December 2018, he gave those original Banderites (1.201 people) a full recognition and the status of veterans[+][+].
· In March 2022, Poroshenko gave[+] two civilian pickup trucks labeled "Bandera-Mobiles" (with decals of Bandera's face on the hoods), in honor of Stepan Bandera, to the Territorial Defense Battalion of Kyiv.
Donbas[+] is a coal mining region that was part of eastern Ukraine from 1922-2022 (now part of Russia) consisting of two Republics - Donetsk and Luhansk - where most residents have been Russians for centuries. In 2022, after Bolsheviks defeated the Ukrainian nationalists, Lenin gave that part of former Russian Empire with mostly ethnic Russian residents to the Soviet Republic of Ukraine under condition that it remains part of the Soviet Union and under Moscow governance (Kyiv administration) but in 1991, Ukraine violated that agreement by breaking off from the Soviet Union and from Moscow, and since 2014, Ukrainians had been demolishing all Lenin's monuments, therefore they have no rights to claim the territories he conditionally granted them. Since Ukrainians hate Lenin and Stalin so much that they demonize them, then in the Russian view[+], it is only fair to give back all the land[ꚛ] that Lenin and Stalin allocated to Soviet Ukraine, without even asking the locals’ permission (the majority were Russians in Donbas).
according to the Russian Orthodox Church Patriarch Kirill, the war is not about territorial or political aims or influence but about spiritual or ‘metaphysical’ aims - battle against the Antichrist and anti-Christian values.
The Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) is an intergovernmental military alliance in Eurasia consisting of six post-Soviet states: Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, and Tajikistan, formed in 2002.
Eastern Slavs consist of Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine. There are also Western Slavs (Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland) and Southern Slavs (Bosnia & Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, and Slovenia).
The term Third World arose during the Cold War to define countries that remained non-aligned with either NATO or the Warsaw Pact.
The “First World” represented the United States, Canada, Japan, South Korea, the Southern Cone, Western European countries and other allies, while the “Second World” represented the Soviet Union, China, Cuba, North Korea, Vietnam, and their allies. This terminology provided a way of broadly categorizing the nations of the Earth into three groups based on political divisions.
“Third World” was a political, rather than economic, grouping. However, since most Third World countries were economically poor and non-industrialized, it became a stereotype to refer to developing countries as “third-world.” In political discourse, the term Third World was often associated with being underdeveloped.
![[+]](https://www.virtuology.biz/images/consciousness-scale.png){kind=link}
![[ꚛ]](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd1de0a0f-6a9f-475d-9184-24788eb3740f_1780x1074.jpeg){kind=link}
![[ꚛ]](https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-z3GtzNi0OYA/YD_uwVhU7lI/AAAAAAAAHgw/cLUp3JB5q2wjYYmINNGsG324psE0Cc-DgCLcBGAsYHQ/s1109/2014-0427-victims-of-US-aggression.png){kind=link}
![[ꚛ]](https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-_z8WeHsVHFA/T042BBVdcOI/AAAAAAAAE3U/VCDmCo70_Gc/s1600/us+military+and+cia+interventions+since+WW2.png){kind=link}
![[ꚛ]](https://wp.en.aleteia.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/05/000_33EZ3KR.jpg?w=1024){kind=link}
![[ꚛ]](https://www.ukrainianworldcongress.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/ukraines-president-volodymyr-zelensky-met-with-pope-francis-in-the-vatican-city.png){kind=link}
![[ꚛ]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FwLtC0DXsAM6e8A.png){kind=link}
![[ꚛ]](https://bigthink.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Cropped-Ukraine.png){kind=link}
