Our warmongering Western leaders working on behalf of war-profiteers are lying to us that Ukraine is fighting for democracy so as to get the public support for war effort
Welcome to the peace initiative for Ukraine in which you can contibute by raising your awareness as well as your consciousness[+] and spirit to the modes[+] of neutrality[*], decency, respectfulness, wisdom[*], objectivity, mastery of the intellect, surrender (ego and mind to God’s will), and finally peace (inner then outer). To properly grasp everything, we recommend reading the articles of this peace initiative in the order that we[*] designed it, which is listed in the Contents. So if you haven’t read the previous articles, we urge you to do it, please. Did you read the this “Reality Checks” segment from the beginning? Please, do so for a better grasp of the topic of this article: The Real Beginning of the War in Ukraine
Calling Ukraine a democracy is like calling NATO a defensive alliance.😊
In this article we expose the fake narrative of NATO and Kyiv propagandists
A Ukrainian finds a magic lamp, rubs it, and a genie pops out, offering three wishes. “I wish for freedom, democracy, and peace!” the Ukrainian says. The genie smirks, “Sorry, pal, I can grant wishes, but I can’t rewrite the West’s script for Ukraine. How about a nice beach vacation instead?”😊
The war in Ukraine is often propagated as an epic battle between “democracy” and “autocracy” – like a Hollywood blockbuster where the good guys always wear blue and yellow😊.
There is a villain in this story: an autocrat who rules with an iron hand like he’s auditioning for a dictator biopic, who bans all opposition political parties and jails his political opponents; a despotic ruler who shuts down all opposition media and news outlets faster than you can say “fake news”, while maintaining a monopoly on what the public sees and hears; a paranoid man who surrounds himself with cronies and is backed by powerful, criminal oligarchs; a vain man who wants the whole world to pay attention to him and do as told.
We are talking about Volodymyr Zelensky, of course – because who else could turn a warzone into a one-man show😊? Before you dismiss it as “Russian propaganda” and start clutching your pearls, have a look at all the evidence here – it’s juicier than a tabloid exposé😊.
Perhaps, it may suffice to many to just provide this video[»] evidence from an American fiercest ally of Kyiv, US Senator Lindsey Graham, who openly and shamelessly admitted that for them "This war's about money. The richest country in all of Europe for rare earth minerals is Ukraine, two to seven trillion dollars’ worth[ꚛ]. Ukraine is ready to do a deal with us, not the Russians, so it is in our interest that Russia does not take over.” Has he no shame? The audacity to stand for the war for profit as if he’s pitching a get-rich-quick scheme on late-night TV😊!
So, clearly, the war in Ukraine is not about democracy or freedom or human rights or any of that staff that are used as false excuses in order to make dumb Ukrainians die for the nasty Western ruling elites getting those minerals and getting rich.
A country widely recognized as one of the most dysfunctional and corrupt on Earth, the center of human trafficking, judicial corruption and theft in Europe, widely infiltrated by Nazis and fascists, guilty of killing thousands of its own people in a brutal civil war caused by a CIA Coup, where the opposition is banned, where the church is oppressed, where a cabal of actors and oligarchs cronies run a massive money laundering scheme, and ruled by a de facto dictator, suddenly becomes the bastion of freedom and democracy? That’s like calling a dumpster fire a lighthouse – someone’s been sniffing too much propaganda glue😊.
As Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and a New York Times best-selling author, Chris Hedges wrote in an article[+], the warmongers' playbook that is used to lure the West into one military fiasco after another, including Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and now Ukraine, is always the same:
✅ Freedom and democracy are threatened by an evil dictator who must be vanquished – cue the dramatic music and a villain twirling a mustache.
✅ Human rights must be protected – and nothing protects human rights like a good ol’ bombing campaign.
✅ The fate of Europe and NATO, along with a “rules-based international order”[»] is at stake – because who else will enforce rules nobody voted for?
✅ Victory is assured – as long as you ignore the fine print about body bags and blown budgets.
Let us check the reality of these claims one by one but most importantly the reality on the battlefield, as it affects the foundation of peace arrangements – because nothing clears the fog of war like a reality check with extra mustard😊.
The US-puppet Kyiv regime1 and its masters are trying to sell this war as a fight for freedom and democracy not just in Ukraine but the whole of Europe and beyond, which cannot be further from the truth knowing that since Ukraine came out of the Russian sphere of influence into total dependence on the West in 2014, Ukraine lost its independence and freedom and became an electoral autocracy rather than democracy, as we will provide evidence here – like trading one leash for another, but with fancier branding😊. There are still people who are buying into this narrative about Ukraine fighting for freedom and democracy to protect Western civilization – like they’re swallowing a fairy tale without checking for poison apples, thus we offer them here to take a bite of the reality sandwich – spoiler: it’s not as tasty as the propaganda pie😊.
Some[+] are calling Ukraine an open air prison because the Kyiv regime increased its border guard strength by 15.000 to 75.000[+]. In most countries border guards are meant to keep illegals out but in Ukraine they are employed to keep people in! Instead of using those 15.000 men to fight the Russians, they use them to fight the Ukrainians – how insane is that?! It’s like hiring a chef to guard the fridge instead of cooking dinner😊.
Also, in May 2024, they mined[»] the border with Romania so that their own people don't run away but they did not mine the border with Russia in Kharkiv against the Russian offensive. Here is evidence[»] of the first Ukrainian anti-war fugitives killed by the mines of their own criminal government that rather kills them than let them flee the country. Here is another evidence[+][»] of a guy resisting mobilization being beaten to death by criminal military recruiters who rather kill them than let them be. Kyiv is a regime, not a government. Where is Maidan 3? They protested against Kyiv corruption but not against Kyiv genocide? Apparently, the revolution got lost in the mail. Maybe they’re too busy dodging draftto organize a rally😊.
Want another joke?
How many Western leaders does it take to change a lightbulb? Fifty: one to change the bulb, forty-nine to tell you it’s saving Ukraine’s democracy, while they pocket the old bulb to resell it as a shiny new “beacon of freedom” to the highest bidder.😊
Click here to watch a video by Ben Norton from Geopolitical Economy Report showing the EU’s top foreign-policy official Josep Borrell admitting the West’s new cold war on China and Russia is not a conflict of “democracies vs. authoritarians,” conceding, “On our side, there are a lot of authoritarian regimes.” He acknowledged that their economic rather than political systems are in rivalry.
Fallacy of the West's Concern for Freedom of Ukraine
The West’s “Freedom” fetish is laid bare here, folks, grab your truth goggles, because only truth will set you free. Clear thinking will cut through the fog, and expect a chuckle to keep you sane.
Before we get into exposing all the evidence of autocracy and lack of democracy in Ukraine, allow us to expose the fallacy of the West's concern for freedom of Ukraine.
This article, like the rest of this peace initiative, is a wake-up call to raise your awareness and the level of your consciousness (swap out negativity for some positive vibes). We’re shining a spotlight on how NATO’s war-drum-banging propagandists have spun a web of fallacies, woven a tapestry of half-truths, to manufacture consent – to trick the public into cheering for war instead of waving the white flag for peace talks. It’s like they’re selling you a ticket to a blockbuster war movie with a shaky script, hoping you won’t notice the plot holes. With us in your corner, you may walk out of that theater, or circus to be precise, unbruised.
Here’s the deal: the West’s approach to Ukraine is like a doctor prescribing aspirin for a broken leg, or slapping a Band-Aid on a fracture and calling it surgery😊. To fix a mess like war, you’ve got to tackle the root causes, not just slap sanctions on the symptoms. The problem here is a textbook case of what medical experts call a misdiagnosis so bad it could star in a sitcom about clueless doctors😊. To cure any disease, including wars, we need to identify and treat the underlying causes, not just the symptoms. Get the diagnosis wrong, and the treatment’s a bust – sometimes even fatal, killing a patient. In Ukraine’s case, the West’s misguided remedies are crippling the patient further, amputating its vitality (so to speak) instead of restoring it, with the very real risk of wiping it off the map entirely.
Too many Westerners, bless their hearts, are focusing only on the surface or symptoms, missing the deeper triggers of this conflict and so playing whack-a-mole with the wrong hammer. Our peace initiative, on the other hand, takes a big-picture view a holistic approach to geopolitics, zeroing in on the underlying causes to find a lasting fix.
Now, let’s address the elephant in the room: idiocy. Psychologists will tell you it is an incurable disease, and some Western leaders seem to be poster children for it. We’ll let the higher powers judge their mental state (Russophobia, Russophrenia[?], paranoia, mania, hysteria, delusions, madness, psychosis, psychopathy or whatever they’re wrestling with) and actions. Unless they have a PhD in stubbornness, these folks seem to be, like Nazis before and neo-Nazis now, so deep in their anti-Russia obsession – politically, professionally, financially, emotionally – that expecting them to snap out of it is like asking a cat to stop chasing lasers😊. So, we’re turning to you, the public, counting on you to break free from decades of toxic anti-Russia narratives (yes, all those Hollywood flicks with cartoonish Russian villains didn’t help). Detox from the propaganda to make a clear-eyed diagnosis, get it right, and let’s work toward a real solution for this crisis.
The takeaway? The evidence here screams that the West’s meddling in Ukraine isn’t about defending freedom or democracy – it’s more like a geopolitical chess game with extra pawns, or a geopolitical soap opera😊. Anyone peddling that “save Ukraine’s freedom” line is probably selling you a bridge to nowhere. Preaching that gospel is likely spinning a yarn. Don’t trust liars on this, also make sure to double-check their other stories. Let’s aim for a finale that’s less war epic and more peace treaty😊.
We are about to expose the violations of human right to freedom by Kyiv regime – spoiler alert: it’s not exactly a beacon of liberty – but first we need to debunk fake Western support of freedom as there is no freedom in their own countries. The point is, since they are not caring for freedom at home, then their alleged support in fighting for freedom in Ukraine is a hoax, especially considering that Ukraine is not and will not be free of Western predators under whose yoke Ukrainians live.
Here is some random evidence to expose Western fake care for freedom and lack of freedom:
➡ The self-anointed “the Land of the Free”, the US has world’s highest incarceration rate[+] because people with minor offenses such as drug possession are denied freedom for lengthy periods. President Barack Obama stated[+] that the US had 5 percent of the world's population but 25 percent of the world's prisoners. Prisons are turned into forced labor camps[+][+][+][+] (like Soviet gulags[+]). Unlike Russia, the US intelligence services created secret prisons in allied states where they not just imprison but conduct horrendous tortures of detainees – in Abu Ghraib in Iraq, at Guantánamo naval base in Cuba, Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan, and secret detention camps in Eastern Europe. During Occupy movement, the Obama administration arrested over 7.775 people[+] and Biden administration charged more than 1.000 people[+] for participating in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot[+] but when Putin administration arrested and charged much fewer[+][+][+][+] protesters, he was condemned as evil dictator while the US gets a free pass, like a kid caught stealing cookies but claiming it’s for “national security”😊. The United States has many political prisoners, too – here[+] is a list. Joe Biden has put hundreds of his political opponents in jail[»]. The Biden administration sent[»] an 82-year veteran to prison for life for the crime of repeating ‘Russian misinformation’ – because apparently, free speech expires at 80, like a bad coupon😊. How insane this country is in that sense, one only needs to see[ꚛ] how they sell and promote prison merchandise as if it is a tourist attraction – not sure whether we should cry or laugh about it. Alcatraz is not even a prison but a concentration camp! Alcatraz = Auschwitz. Imagine if Nazis had made such merchandise for Auschwitz!
➡ The self-anointed “the Land of the Free”, the US has the most laws and regulations than any country in the world! In the US, you can’t even remodel your own kitchen without a permit, your government regulates what food you are allowed and not allowed to eat while they allow GMO foods, fake foods with all sorts of additives, chemicals and what have you – because nothing screams “freedom” like needing FDA approval to eat an apple😊. A farmer is not allowed to sell his fresh food or give you an apple from his tree without an FDA approval. Your government even decides how hot your shower is allowed to be; it's absurd. No one there has a freedom not to follow all these ridiculous rules. There is no country in the world as restrictive, as oppressive, as aggressive, as misogynistic and as opposed to human liberty as the US – but try telling that to Americans waving their star-spangled freedom flags and indoctrinated Westerners falling for American slogans of them being “the free world” like suckers falling for a “free cruise” scam😊.
The fallacy of freedom narrative is also evident in the fact that no one claims that a US President is “The leader of the free world” other than Americans– the need to sing their own praises, toot their own horn, self-praise, and aggrandize themselves speaks for itself, like a peacock strutting its feathers at a pigeon convention😊.
When the Western hegemons and their mouthpieces talk about freedom, they mostly mean the freedom to sin. All the debauchery that the US and Western governments allow is a freedom to be uncivilized, primitive, and hedonisticwhile condemning the rest of the world for not allowing that. We are talking about allowing people to be promiscuous, walk naked in public, pervert men using women's toilets, locker rooms and shelters[+] just because they have freedom to claim they are women, women being induced to look and behave like prostitutes and porn-stars, schooling children to freely change gender even without parental consent, etc. Butt-naked cowboys and rednecks are telling the Muslim people that their clothing is out of fashion , as if burqas didn’t get the “freedom fashion” memo😊.
➡ Freedom of speech is no longer the same – in the US they are starting to be persecuted not even for what they said but for what they listened to: The US Department of Justice ordered Google to publish the names, addresses, phone numbers of all YouTube viewers from January 2023. They also ask for information about those who watched the streams, where, as they indicate, information necessary for their police investigations could be voiced. It's unconstitutional, it's terrible, and it happens every day. These YouTube warrants are scary, allowing police to target people simply because of the content they consume[»].
And here is an outrageous admission[»] from Hillary Clinton how the ruling classes that she is part of want total control by censoring content on social media – because nothing says “democracy” like a digital muzzle😊!
🤬 Self-acclaimed beacons of freedom of press (but more like beacons of hypocrisy shining brighter than a lighthouse on steroids😊), Western (NATO) countries’ leaders are censoring or blocking content from Russian media channels[+] such as RT, Sputnik, RIA, etc. while accusing Putin of doing that! Consider how come all Western media, including CNN can still report[»] from Moscow while RT is banned in the EU and US but they keep on alleging that Russia is the one with no free press! NATO leaders don't want the public to find out the other side of the story out while they are conducting the proxy war with Russia via Ukraine. Anyone capable of thinking for themselves is bound to quit trusting the hypocrites and liars unless they’re auditioning for “World’s Most Gullible Citizen”😊.
😶 There is countless evidence of the fallacy of freedom of speech in the US and the West but let us just mention some here how the United States sets an example for “democratic” treatment of members of the press: journalists removed by force[»][»][»] when asking tough questions (here[ꚛ] compared to Russia), detentions of journalists[»] who dared to film protests of students and teachers in the US universities over Gaza issue, plus detention of professors[»][»]and beating up[»][»][»][ꚛ][»][»] and detaining[»] the protesters there. In just couple of days, 50 university professors and 2.400 students had been arrested in anti-Israel protests in America. While the border with Mexico was wide open, universities were then guarded with snipers – why do they need snipers for protesting students at a US university?[ꚛ][ꚛ]. That’s not just bizarre but highly revealing the fallacy of US democracy – like a plot twist in a dystopian novel nobody asked for😊.
The US President is again and again demanding journalists to be fired for reporting facts he doesn’t like, exposing his lies, like in this post[+] demanding not just sacking a journalist but “throwing her out like a dog” after she exposed his lies about obliterating Iranian nuclear facilities. Totally normal.
The same thing in Germany[»][»][»][»][»][»][»], Spain[»][»], Portugal[»], Poland[»][»], Italy[»], France[»], Holland[»], Iceland[»], Romania[+], etc. Many or all journalists in Europe who do not fall in line but contradict the official narrative or to engage in the whole propaganda have been either arrested or detained, intimidated, dehumanized, or humiliated by the ruling European regimes. Just in the UK, they did it to Julian Assange, Craig Murray, Kit Klarenberg, David Miranda, Vanessa Beeley, Richard Medhurst[+] (read here[+] about his arrest from him)…
Imagine if this was in Russia, how they would demonize Putin but no word of criticism about Biden, Scholz, Sanchez, Duda, Meloni, Macron, Starmer… In the light of evident hypocrisy and fake democracy, no wonder the world is against them and siding with anyone who is against the West, like Russia. Julian Assange’s dad thanked[+] Putin for supporting his son, so what does that say about Putin allegedly being against the freedom of speech?
🤢 Evidence that there is no free speech or free expression in the US or the West is the police brutality against those who oppose the government that supports a genocide and ethnic cleansing. Police brutality in the US[+] is one of the worst in the world[+][+] and it is increasing, getting worse. In 2023, US police killed 1.352[+][+] people and injured or beaten up many more but only one police officer got convicted[+] in 2023 (five in 2022). In Russia, they do not tolerate police brutality as they do in the West, so in 2022, 463[+] police personnel were convicted but they have much less cases of police killings.
Compare Western and Russian police brutality[»]. Here are just some of the instances of police brutality (including against women) during pro-Palestine protests in Germany[»][»][»][»][»][»], Spain[»][»], Poland[»][»], Italy[»][»], Paris[»], Amsterdam[»]. Now find, if you can, any such police brutality in Russia. Good luck with that. Good luck with that – you’ll need a magnifying glass and a time machine😊. Conclusion: Russian police is much less brutal than American and European. Who knew “evil” Russia might need to give the West a masterclass in restraint?!😊
List of countries with annual rates and counts for killings by law enforcement officers in 2019, source: Wikipedia, in 2022, the US rate: 33.1
🤐 In the US, there is no freedom of speech – e.g., as vice president candidate, chair of the Democratic Governors Association, Tim Walz claimed[»] that citizens have NO right to free speech if the ruling elite, a.k.a. government, decides what one is seeing is “misinformation.” When the ruling elites silence the opposition, how is this democracy?!
🤫 In the UK, there is no freedom of speech[»] – e.g., back in 2018, 400 people were arrested in Russia for saying something bad on social media. The same year, in twice as small (67 vs 144 million people) United Kingdom over 3.300 people were indicted, prosecuted and arrested for saying something bad on social media – because apparently, tweeting the wrong emoji is a high crime in jolly old England😊.
In the UK, police make 33 arrests a day for offensive online messages[+][+]. Anything that criticizes the ruling elites or their narratives is considered also offensive. Officers from 37 police forces made 12.183 arrests in 2023, the equivalent of about 33 per day, which was an almost 58% rise in arrests since 2019 (7.734 detentions). Civil liberties groups say that the authorities are over-policing the internet and threatening free speech using vague laws. For instance, in April 2025, these British parents were arrested[»][»] due to comments about the school on a closed WhatsApp group. This is tyranny.
🫢 In the EU, there is no freedom of expression. European politicians are jailing people for online posts. Pro-Russian and pro-Palestinian activists get arrested[»] and fined.[»] If Russia arrests protesters, it's evil but if France and Germany arrest and beat protesters, it's fine. Western democracy = double standards so blatant they deserve their own Oscar for hypocrisy😊. Media freedom in the EU is terrible[+] and journalists are unable[+] to fulfil their mission as a watchdog. Journalists are being arrested[+], surveilled, abused, and intimidated to limit their reporting to establishment's narrative or agenda, as well as exposed to political interference and corruption. European “Media Freedom Act” and “Digital Services Act”[+] with content moderation rules restrict public's access to a plurality of trustworthy and independent reporting by censoring or banning what the elites or certain lobbies deem as “disinformation”, “illegal online content”, and "harmful content". Some freedom of expression violations here[+][+][+].
For instance, Germany’s Network Enforcement Act and Paragraph 188 of the Criminal Code allow prosecution with up to three years in prison for unsubstantiated critical remarks against politicians and other public figures[+][+]. For example, a journalist was given a seven-month suspended prison sentence for posting a satirical meme depicting Interior Minister Nancy Faeser with a digitally altered sign reading, “I hate freedom of speech.” And Economy Minister Robert Habeck filed a criminal complaint after a Bavarian man shared a meme on X in June 2024, altering a shampoo logo from “Schwarzkopf” (black head) to “Schwachkopf” (weak head, implying “idiot”) with Habeck’s photo, leading to a police raid on 50 people's homes and criminal charges. Yet, German politicians are quick to slam[+] Putin’s crackdown on free speech in Russia, while they’re undermining the very principles they claim to uphold as their own laws suppress and punish memes and dissent with a zeal that would make the Kremlin blush😊. German hypocrisy is award-winning and on track of becoming cultural heritage. Move over, Black Forest Gateau, the real national treasure is Germany's expertly curated double standards😊.
memes on Interior Minister Nancy Faeser and Economy Minister Robert Habeck
Another out of many such examples is this one[+]with a German woman posting photo of a politician with raised arm and getting sentences to €1.800 fine.
Furthermore, the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA), enforced since 2023, combats what the ruling elites deem as disinformation, targeting satire, dissent, and controversial opinions. In 2025, regulators planned penalties against X, including fines potentially exceeding $1 billion, for failing to police content adequately. This reflects a broader push to regulate online speech, though specific individual cases are less documented here.
“Freedom of speech has disappeared in Europe… The continent has lost its soul.” – former Austrian Foreign Minister Karin Kneissl[+] – and it’s hard to argue when Europe’s soul seems to be on permanent vacation😊.
🤬 Even deliberately calling someone by the wrong gender pronouns may land you in jail for two years in the UK, [+]. In France, people are arrested for claiming Macron's wife is a transgender[+]! In Germany, under a 2024 legislation[+][+][+], anyone who attempts to expose an individual’s past gender identity can be fined up to €10.000 ($10,630). In other words, you are not allowed to tell the truth about anyone's gender! How is that free speech? It’s like being free to whisper your opinion in a soundproof room😊. You are free to change your gender every year on legal documents without undergoing surgery or hormone therapy but you are not free to say that someone did that – yes, that makes sense… to mentally challenged German legislators who must have skipped logic class😊. The legislation on ‘self-determination’ in gender was backed by 374 MPs, mostly from the ruling ‘traffic-light’ coalition. In other words, LGBTQ+ have the right to ‘self-determination’ but ethnic majorities in regions such as Crimea and Donbas in Ukraine do not – again, that makes total sense… to 374 mentally challenged German legislators who probably think “double standards” is a new yoga pose😊. Because double standards is part of the Western rules-based order.
Misgendering is valid reason to jail people in the West but when Russians imprison fraudsters, extremists, traitors, and foreign agents[+][»][»][+][»][ꚛ][+][+][+][»] like Navalny[+] or blasphemous hooligans[+] like Pussy Riot[+][+][+][+], this is condemned as evil. This goes to show that Western rules-based-order[»] is duplicitous and illegitimate, like a magician pulling “freedom” out of a hat while hiding the handcuffs😊. Here is the evidence[»] that British Prime Minister Sunak said he would deport anyone who protests, as typical for fake democracy! Adapting the US mantra[»]“rules for thee and not for me”[+][+] – because why share the freedom pie when you can hog it all? 😊
➡ No freedom of press in the West – reprisals against Russian journalists and media[+] since the start of the special military operation in Ukraine are too many to count and too evident to explain.
Watching Russian news media is forbidden in the “democratic”, “free” EU and anyone violating these EU sanctions faces criminal charges such as a German guy and his Ukrainian wife who were found guilty of broadcasting sanctioned channels such as "Rossiya 1" and "RT", among others. The District Court has also issued an asset seizure order for approximately 120.000€ ($134.000)[+][+]. Outrageous!
➡ In Germany, opposition supporters, even kids, are persecuted with speech crackdowns worse than in Russia. For instance, in February 2024, 16-year-old schoolgirl couldn’t escape the long arm of the law for… liking the wrong Smurfs, as she was caught by police for expressing fondness for an opposition political party. Her crime? She shared a TikTok video clip explaining that Smurfs are blue, just like Germany – a reference to color blue used by the opposition party AfD (which was then, worryingly for ruling elites, raising in popularity). Her school principal, apparently moonlighting as a TikTok snitch😊, reported[+][+] her to the police that dragged her from her school class, humiliated and stigmatized her in front of her classmates, interrogated her, gave her a stern talking-to, and told her to keep her Smurf-loving opinions off social media. Is this freedom of expression in the land of beer, bratwurst, and bureaucracy? More like freedom to shush. But with this law enforcement overreach, they only helped it gain traction faster than a viral cat meme😊 as just weeks later, according to polls, AfD became the most popular party in the country. And the girl won[+] the court case against the police after her family sued them, proving it was unlawful what they did. This is just one of many cases proving that the law enforcement forces and their political leaders do unlawful things even to the kids all the while they, as hypocrites, rebuke Putin for allegedly suppressing his opposition, but he is better than them, as he at least has never persecuted or humiliated kids.
But it’s not just kids getting the short end of the schnitzel😊. Germans are getting hauled to court for liking the wrong posts online and criticizing the members of political elite on social media[+]. According to Germany’s legal labyrinth – Sections 130, 86a, and 185–187 of the Criminal Code, to be precise – certain user interactions on social media, including liking a post that’s deemed to incite hatred, deny the Holocaust, use Nazi symbols and slogans, or sling insults can land you in hot water (may lead to fines or prosecution). For instance, one 73-year-old grandpa faced 75 days in jail for commenting “Alles für Deutschland,” a phrase tied to Nazi history (but less so than “Slava Ukraini” that German politicians freely chant), probably thinking it was just a patriotic flex. Even memes aren’t safe! But here’s the kicker: German politicians and media can, just like Nazis, assume superiority and sling mud at Russians, Putin, or any world leader and nation that doesn’t bow to Berlin or Brussels, and it’s all fine. Call it selective enforcement with a side of sauerkraut😊.
Now, don’t get us wrong – laws against harm or hate are necessary. Nobody’s saying you should be free to tweet swastikas or death threats. But when Germany wags its finger at Putin for stifling dissent while playing speech police at home, it’s like a vegan in leather shoes preaching animal rights😊. Hypocrisy, anyone? And let’s talk about the Nazi ban. German law cracks down hard on anything remotely Third Reich-ish, which is fair – except it’s oddly selective. Neo-Nazis and their Ukrainian cousins get a pass when their bile targets Russians, but if a regular Hans or Gretel steps out of line, it’s straight to the slammer😊. Anti-Semitism is rightly prosecuted, but anti-Russianism? Apparently, that’s just Tuesday. Double standards like these make the law look less like justice and more like a game of “pick your villain.”
➡ No freedom of movement in the US if one opposes the governing party’s narrative. In early June 2024, without any court order and explanation why, acting on the whims of the ruling elites, the US State Department pulled off the airplane and seized the passport[+][+] of former Marine and UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter, who has been very vocal about lies and deceptions of the US government, in particular about Russia, the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East. He committed no crime but was not allowed to leave the country. No Western media reported that because apparently to them this is normal, not worthy of reporting. This is normal only in fascist states.
➡ The US has world’s most notorious mass surveillance program both globally and domestically, which, obviously, infringes on freedom of everyone. Communists were amateurs in comparison to Americans or Westerners[»], who spy like they’re auditioning for a dystopian remake of Big Brother😊. This was first revealed by ex-CIA and ex-NSA analyst Edward Snowden. After 9/11, in the name of national security, the US increased mass surveillance through the Patriot Act whereby the government spies on ordinary Americans having the authority to monitor phone and email communications, collect bank and credit reporting records, and track the activity of innocent Americans on the Internet. While most Americans think it was created to catch terrorists, the US government actually spies on regular citizens to keep them under control, manipulate, and oppress them. The US government conducts mass surveillance also of foreign phone and internet users. Therefore, the US government threatens both an individual’s freedom to express themselves, and their right to privacy (maintain a private life and private communications). State intrusion into private, family or home affairs – prevent people from exercising their freedom.
There is much evidence that surveillance in Europe is almost as bad, such as an incident[+] when a common British 18-year old citizen made a joking comment2 on Snapchat on his way from Gatwick airport to the Spanish island of Menorca in July 2022. His message was immediately picked up by the UK security services who flagged it to Spanish authorities while the easyJet plane was still in the air. Two Spanish F-18 fighter jets were sent to flank the aircraft in a matter of minutes. Appearing in court, he said the message was "a joke in a private group setting. It was just sent to my friends I was travelling with on the day". In other words, they surveil all our messages on a scale the “evil” communists never did. Not sure about the Russian surveillance but never heard of such incidents in Russia, which would certainly make all the headlines in the Western mass media, which is prone and very eager to condemn and ridicule Russian authorities like kids chasing the ice cream truck😊.
➡ The UK recently completed a trial[»] of a carbon credit system that sets a daily allowance for each person – in effect, a limit on everyone’s ability to purchase food, clothing, goods, and travel as they have always done. Net zero is supported by the Liberal Party, the Labor Party, and the Nationals, who seem to think rationing your grocery trips is the new “freedom.” Nothing says “liberty” like being told how many carrots you’re allowed to buy😊. Only One Nation stands firm in defending agricultural sector from this insane push to control the food supply and hollow out the bush.
➡ No real freedom of meaningful choice – the notorious “fight for democracy” under which banner NATO countries have been killing and injuring millions of civilians across the globe contradicts their claims about fighting for freedom and diversity. Why don't they let other countries in the world to freely choose their system, be it communism, autocracy, monarchy, or whatever, and instead back the rebels to establish so-called democracy by force? Why don't they let diversity in the world and force others to have democracy and capitalism? The answer is: because otherwise they can't bribe, exploit, and plunder local natural resources. In the US, there is only one system to choose from (plutocracy disguised as democracy) but there are 23 flavors of bagels to give you the illusion of freedom of choice.
➡ Russia is much more economically free than the US since US external debt to GDP ratio is much worse than Russia’s ratio – US 123 %[+] vs Russia 14%[+][+][+]. Even Ukraine has it better than the US (81%); the EU – 84%[+]. Those who are in huge debt are not free. The US has the highest foreign debt in the world and, despite its large economy, compared to the GDP, it owes other countries more than it earns. When it comes to freedom of debt, Kuwait is the leader of free world (with the lowest debt to GDP ratio[+]).
Many scandals in the UK expose it as being worse than Russia, such as refusing banking services to political opponents, such as Nigel Farage, based on his views[+], which the bank has "seen as xenophobic and pandering to racists" – because nothing says “open society” like closing someone’s bank account for wrongthink😊.
And here is another example of fallacy of the West's concern for freedom or their constant hijacking of the word “freedom” to suit their agenda: since 2019 and allegedly in December 2024, re-elected US President Trump posted[+][ꚛ] “For purposes of national security and freedom throughout the world, the US feels that the ownership of Greenland is a necessity.” How is the US annexing Greenland a necessity for freedom throughout the world??? It’s like saying you need to “borrow” your neighbor’s house for world peace😊. Many insane Western leaders often use words like “freedom” and “democracy” in the most bizarre contexts taking their audiences as retards who use no brains to see through such wacky narratives – as if we’re all just nodding along like bobbleheads on a dashboard😊.
Furthermore, perhaps the greatest evidence of both Western and Kyiv regime's fraudulence regarding the alleged fight for freedom in Ukraine is the fact that Kyiv regime is the worst enemy of freedom in the world as evidenced by their nasty restrictions such as banning people from freely traveling out of the country and building huge wire fences at the borders with even their allies, such as here[»] with Romania – Kyiv regime has turned Ukraine into a big prison!
Fallacy of the West’s Concern for Democracy in Ukraine
We are about to expose the fake democracy in Ukraine – spoiler: it’s about as real as a reality TV show😊 – but first we need to expose the fake Western support of democracy as there is no true democracy in their own countries. The point is, since the Western leaders are not caring for democracy at home, then their alleged support in fighting for it in Ukraine is a hoax worthy of a snake oil salesman’s pitch😊.
The EU, for one, is not a democracy. Its officials are not elected by the people let’s start with that. The EU commission is appointed and then confirmed[»]. Not voted in. Those appointed officials then pressure countries to conform like a school bully demanding lunch money and essentially are ruling Europe. Democracy nowhere to be found – unless you count “do as we say” as a ballot option😊.
Here is some random evidence to expose the hollowness of the democracy-versus-autocracy narrative revealing Western fake care for democracy and lack of democracy:
➡ Elections became useless in the West:
The EU has cancelled more elections than Russia – the EU rejected the election results of many countries (Russia, Georgia, Romania…) just because its ruling elite did not like the results. Did Russia reject or cancel any election results at all? They also used , lawfare[+] to jail or prevent from running for office more political rivals than Russia did, such as in France – Le Pen, Romania – Georgescu, Germany – Weidel, Ireland – McGregor, Netherlands – Geert Wilders… Desperate EU officials’ motto: "If you can't beat them, ban them!”
🇮🇹 In Italy, the unelected head of the EU, Ursula von der Leyen, was directly meddling[»][»] in Italian elections in September 2022 by warning ahead of election that if any nation votes the ‘wrong’ way, meaning not in line with Brussels’ dictates, the EU will crack down: “We will see the results of the vote in Italy. If things go in a difficult direction, we have tools, as in the case of Poland and Hungary.” Democracy be damned, obedience comes first. Her “tools” evidently worked as the new elected Italian PM Meloni fell in line preventing her from pursuing conservative policies.
🇫🇷 In France, opposition leader and presidential candidate Marine Le Pen was sentenced to years in jail on 31 March 2015 charged with embezzling the European Parliament funds, barred from running for office[+][+]. Le Pen was the frontrunner for the 2027 Presidential race but Macron's regime banned her from running so that Macron would have more chance to be re-elected. Hypocritical Western officials did not condemn Macron as evil, like they did for Putin when Navalny was also sentenced for embezzlement, exposing their double standards. Navalny had less than 2% supporters, Le Pen over 34%[+], which made it even more clear that Le Pen was a threat to the establishment while Navalny was not at all. The proof[»] that it was a mere political decision to prevent her from running is in the fact that normally when a court is deciding something and one appeals, the court sentence is suspended and the case is retried because of the presumption of innocence. But here the judge made the decision on inability to run for the presidency from immediate effect, ignoring the appeal. Western right-wing politicians condemned the verdict, such as Italy’s deputy PM Matteo Salvini[+], Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán[+], winner of the Dutch national 2023 election Geert Wilders[+], Spanish far-right Vox party chief Santiago Abascal, and Reform UK party leader Nigel Farage[+]; Trump[+] and Putin also criticized it. Le Pen may be gone but her party will probably benefit from this judgement. The anger of her 11 million voters is likely to increase and they have now additional arguments to win more people to their side – because nothing rallies a crowd like a good old-fashioned injustice story😊.
Also, the leading party of LePen is excluded from government, while the 3rd place party rules through playing the positions against each other – like a chess game where the pawns run the board😊. Macron's party has lost the majority of their seat but he is still in power, clinging to power like a cat on a curtain😊.
🇪🇪 In Estonia, Russian ethnic minority (80.000 voters out of 613.000 total[+]) is banned from voting in both national(since 1992) and in local elections[+] (since 2025), disenfranchising ~6% of Estonia’s population (~19% in 1992), violating democratic and legal norms such as the ECHR’s non-discrimination principles and equal representation, a core democratic principle. Democratic facade there crumbles as since 1991, Russian-speaking residents are branded ‘non-citizens’ (holding "grey passports" indicating stateless status[+][+]) and denied the right to vote in elections, being punished not for what they did but for what they are! These policies that marginalize an ethnic minority is a discriminatory ploy that mocks justice, FCNM’s minority participation rights3 and ICERD’s ban on ethnic discrimination. Denying voting rights based on ethnicity or nationality violates Article 14 (non-discrimination) of European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Denying citizenship based on language tests violates Article 26 (non-discrimination) of UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
Needless to say, collective punishment undermines democratic fairness – because nothing says “equal representation” like locking out a whole ethnic group😊. Finding legal loopholes, such as citing vague “security concerns” and impractical “naturalization options”, to justify de facto illegal discrimination, only exposes the illusion of democracy in the EU! Democratic principles, as enshrined in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (Article 21), require non-discrimination, which means that Estonia violates that, too, but Brussels allows it proving the West’s democratic posturing is a hypocritical farce drenched in Russophobic bias, xenophobia, and racism4 – a masterclass in “do as I say, not as I do”😊.
🇱🇻 In Latvia, Russian ethnic minority are declared as ‘non-citizens’ and barred from voting in national elections since 1993, which affects now 10-12% of Latvia’s population or ~250.000 people (~29% in 1993). These racist, undemocratic policies that, same as in Estonia, undermine equal representation by disenfranchising significant minorities, violate ICERD’s ethnic discrimination ban, ICCPR’s Article 26 (non-discrimination), ECHR Article 14, FCNM’s Article 4 (non-discrimination) and Article 15 (effective participation in public life), EU Charter Article 21… by creating barriers to political and cultural rights[+] – because nothing screams “democracy” like telling a quarter of a million people their vote doesn’t count😊.
🇷🇴 In Romania, the Western authorities meddle in the elections and their puppets –corrupt judges annulled it when they did not like the results so as not to allow a presidential candidate Georgescu, who won the first round of elections in November 2024, to win, alleging Russian interfering that they did not prove and the President himself said[+] was impossible to prove. Romania's President was illegitimate as his mandate expired, and he was refusing to leave office just like Georgian and Ukrainian presidents but the “democratic” West was fine with that, no condemnation whatsoever. Former EU Commissioner Thierry Breton said[»] in January 2025 that the EU cancelled the electionsin Romania – because apparently, overstaying your welcome is only a crime if your name is Putin😊. Imagine if Putin did that!
In February 2025, Georgescu even got arrested[+] with accusation of participating in a fascist organization and propagating in public space controversial ideologies and historical figures. o And in March 2025, he (and a dozen other candidates[+]) was even banned[+] from running in May’s presidential election due to criminal charges over illegal campaign funding and fascist organization affiliation – funny how he was charged after he won the election, not before. Political persecutions and character assassinations of non-compliant politicians are Brussels’ tyrannic tools to control the governments – as the unelected EU President, von der Leyen warned[»][»]“we have tools” if any nation votes the ‘wrong’ way, meaning not in line with Brussels’ dictates. Their double standards are exposed by the fact that for the same reason that they condemn Georgescu and his affiliates as fascist, they do not do it for Ukrainian ruling politicians who are even more associated with fascist and neo-Nazi organizations.
In April 2025, The Court of Appeal issued a ruling[+][+] to annul the decision of the Constitutional Court to scrap the presidential elections of December 2024, which should have enabled Georgescu to win (judging from the polls) the election in the second round but the next day, the corrupt Superior Council of Magistracy of Romania has initiated[+] a desperate "disciplinary investigation" against the heroic judge[+] who made that ruling – because heaven forbid a judge actually upholds justice instead of Brussels’ script😊. One can only be a presidential candidate in Romania if they don't oppose the EU or NATO and whoever opposes them is declared far-right[+][+] or fascist[+]. "Democracy" in the EU is becoming: you're free to run for office as long as you don't question who really runs the show.
When Georgescu's substitute George Simion (banned in Ukraine since November 2024 because he is anti-war) won the Romanian first round election in May 2025, Western officials[+][+] and media[+][+][+] went into a panic mode with labeled him as fascist but he promotes peace[»] negotiations rather than escalating by rearming Ukraine – because apparently, wanting peace is the new “extremism”😊.
Simion accused[»] Macron on French TV of interfering in their elections, and Telegram app owner Durov confirmed[+] an attempt of French intelligence to get him to “to ban conservative voices in Romania ahead of elections”. Durov refused but how many other media moguls complied? Simion lost the second round as the pro-EU liberal candidate, the mayor of Bucharest, French-puppet (lived in France many years) Nicuşor Dan, won. The most curious thing is that while there is much report about French meddling there and then results mirrored[+] the 2022 French presidential election in which Marine Le Pen was, like Simion, leading until 9:30 p.m. with more than one million votes, which vanished at 10:30 p.m. – as if there is some scheme to help the globalists win. The same also happened in Moldova with highly unpopular Sandu losing the rigged[+] 2024 presidential elections until the last hour.
1st round of voting May 4, 2025: - George Simion 40.96% - Nicușor Dan 20.99% 2nd round of voting May 18, 2025: - George Simion 46.40% - Nicușor Dan 53.60% An increase of +155% for the pro-European. Nothing to see here – just democracy doing its usual backflip into a pile of suspicious ballots😊.
This X thread[+] shows evidence how elections before and after Romania joined the EU differ, implying the EU has not only been meddling in all Romania's elections but orchestrating a voter fraud with a strange increase of number of voters in every second round, who voted for the EU candidate and turn out to be dead people. In 2025 election, in the second round, voter turnout increased by 2 million votes (+2,070,126 extra votes, 21% extra votes compared to the first round – this is insane)! Without voter increase the EU candidate would have lost and Simion would have won. The EU candidate got over 4 million votes more in the second round – he more than tripled his votes in the second round – that never ever happens, so obviously something was fishy there. Simion asked[+][»] Romanians to verify if any of their dead relatives voted! He said there are 1.700.000 dead people in the electoral lists – that’s about the number in the voter turnout increase – because nothing screams “democracy” like zombie voters rising from the grave to support the EU😊. Durov responded[+] that he was ready to come and testify if it helps Romanian democracy.
Also, the fraud team in Romania was getting reports[+] from Ilfov county that elderly patients with mental issues were allegedly being threatened to vote for Nicusor Dan, told they’ll be thrown out of hospitals if not! Simion appealed to The Constitutional Court of Romania to annul the results of the vote bit the court rejected[+] it in a matter of days without much consideration. Simion then claimed[+] it was a coup but victory is inevitable[+].
This voter fraud is similar to the one the US Democrats staged in 2020[ꚛ] and again just a few months earlier in their elections with allowing the illegal immigrants to vote, counting on their support after Biden generously opened the Mexican border for them, causing an uproar in the US – because nothing says “fair election” like inviting non-citizens to the ballot party😊. Further evidence of rigged election is Romanian authorities admitting that they do not allow anti-EU or anti-NATO candidates to run for office, let alone win, as a top court barred lawyer and politician Diana Sosoaca from entering presidential election – The Romanian Constitutional Court argued[+] that her public discourse, including opposition to Romania’s European Union and NATO memberships, made her unfit to uphold the constitutional obligations of the presidency – because apparently, democracy means only pro-NATO cheerleaders need apply😊.
🇬🇪 In Georgia a presidential candidate has lost in December 2024 but refused to leave. “Democratic” West is fine with that, no condemnation whatsoever. Imagine if Putin did that! Also, at that time in January 2025, MEP Thierry Mariani criticized[»] Brussels for its handling of Georgia’s elections, accusing it of interfering in the nation’s democratic process and ignoring the OSCE’s findings - no foreign (Russian) interference in Georgian elections, “The EU is not the protector of democracy but the accomplice of chaos,” he said.
In February 2025, the Speaker of the Georgian Parliament, Shalva Papuashvili, has revealed[+] that USAID funneled $41.7 million into influencing Georgia’s October 2024 elections raising serious concerns about foreign interference and Washington’s role in shaping Georgia’s political landscape.
Many Western[+][+] and Ukrainian[»][»][»] politicians were meddling in Georgia’s 2024 presidential and general elections but hypocritically accusing Russia for doing despite having no evidence. They were openly visiting Georgia ahead of the election making speeches there in support of their puppet candidate and against the disobedient ones
🇩🇪 German government has been trying to ban the most popular[+] party AfD, while the extremist ruling coalition (war-mongering parties arming and funding the neo-Nazis in Ukraine) condemns peace-mongering AfD as extremist. Imagine if Putin tried to ban an opposition party (like Zelensky banned a dozen parties)! Former EU Commissioner Thierry Breton said[»] in January 2025 that the EU may cancel the upcoming German elections: "We did it in Romania and obviously we will have to do it, if necessary, in Germany.”
German government: Planning to ban and repressing the most popular political party in Germany – “This is democracy”. Banning political party in Thailand, German government is furious and says this is not democracy. Forget beer gardens, the true German tradition has become cultivating award-winning double standards😊.
🇲🇩 Moldovan 2024 presidential elections were rigged[+] – NATO puppet President Maia Sandu lost the elections amongst the local population but "won" them fraudulently[+] anyway by a thin margin thanks to the diaspora votes in the EU[+], while limiting the number of ballots Moldovan diaspora in Russia and in Transnistria, voters were blocked with dirty tricks. In Feb. 2023, Moldova's government collapsed and PM Natalia Gavrilita had to step down[+] – further evidence of foul regime.
In March 2025, the leader of an autonomous region Gagauzia of Moldova, Evghenia Gutul was arrested[+»] and sat in one of the most brutal prisons[+] in Europe for the “wrong” pro-Russian political beliefs. She wrote a letter[+] to US President Trump and J.D. Vance asking for help, and a few days later was she released[+»] but only replaced with house arrest[+]. The EU (that de facto rules over Moldavia via its puppet Sandu) pretends it is fighting for democracy when, in fact, it is viciously trying to uphold its globalist stranglehold.
In 2023, Moldova banned[+] a pro-Russian political party Sor and barred[+] pro-Russian party's candidates from local elections, which is sooo “democratic” of them exposing the fallacy of “fighting for democracy” on top of the obvious constant Western meddling[+] (so-called “support”) in Moldova's politics and elections while they hypocritically accuse Russia of meddling whereby not backing their claim with any evidence.
🇬🇧 Both leading UK parties are the same and changed from one to another led to 0 change, and the government's approval is on a historic low now
🇰🇷 South Korean president had an extremely low approval and to stay in power, he initiated martial law to coup the parliament that wanted to impeach him but the “democratic” West was fine with that, no condemnation whatsoever. Imagine if Putin did that!
Yet, all of them tirelessly screech about being pillars of democracy and scold anyone who doesn't conform to the globalist agenda for being authoritarian dictatorships. The illusion of democracy that is in fact demoncracy is becoming more and more evident to those using brains. We are moving to a system, where the "globalist deep state" only allows election, candidates and ruling government if they fit their specific agenda. They literally cancel elections if they’re losing or orchestrate a revolution to annul the results they do not like (like the Orange revolution in Ukraine in 2004).
Furthermore, the Western ruling classes with the help of the prominent mainstream media are making every effort to devalue elections with absurd headlines such as:
“Elections Are Bad for Democracy”[+] – The New York Times. They took away our right to freedom of speech and now they even want to take away people’s right to cast votes to elect their representatives.
Just imagine if Putin or other Russian authorities made such a claim! They would use it to prove that they are evil but when Americans say things like that, we are all supposed to just take it and agree with it – insane!
"You know, the CIA overthrew, I think, 83 governments between 1947 and 1997. This is a third of governments on Earth, and most of them were democratic. It does not deal with democracy."[+] – Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
“In the CIA, we didn’t give a hoot about democracy… democracy didn't mean a thing to us. And I don't think it means a thing today. The true goal of the U.S. government is control”[»] – former CIA agent Philip Agee
➡ What kind of fake democracy this is in the US when a presidential candidate was not even elected but selected by the ruling classes?! Kamala Harris was not chosen democratically. US Democrats were there alleging wanting to 'save democracy' with a candidate who sidestepped democracy to get the nomination. On CNN, Mr. Wonderful claimed[»] that Kamala was not chosen democratically – “This is not important to voters.”
➡ British Labour party staff campaigning for Kamala Harrisin the US presidential election[+] is their version of “democracy” – Western hypocrites expose their double standards as they embrace foreign interference in elections as "normal" and ok only when the West does it but evil when Russia does it or outrageous when US oligarch Elon Musk voices his support for anti-establishment (globalist) parties in the UK[+] and Germany[+] or elsewhere[+]!
➡ Hillary Clinton asked for a foreign interference into the 2024 presidential election – is this how democracy works? In July 2024, in a prank call with what she thought was former Ukrainian Poroshenko, Hillary asked[»] Poroshenko to attack Trump to prevent him to get elected.
➡ As incredible as it may seem, 2020 US presidential election was rigged[+][+][+][+][+], as more than 40%[+] of Americans believe(d) that, which led to major attempts to overturn it, including the famous January 6 mob attack on the Capitol[+]. And in April 2025, new US National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard made a startling revelation[+] with evidence that electronic voting machines have been tampered with to manipulate the results of past US elections! All we need to finally realize how fake American regard for democracy is!
➡ All the “witch-hunting” measures the Democrats have undertaken to prevent their opponent Donald Trump to run as President is anti-democratic and like we have not seen anywhere else, including Russia. They tried to impeach him to disqualify him from ever holding public office again, they issued several indictments[+] against him, they charged him with many sexual misconducts[+] and paying hush money to porn star Stormy Daniels (to stop the false and extortionist accusations during his 2016 presidential campaign), in several states, they brand “Trump dictatorship”[+][+], call him all kinds of names such as insurrectionist, conducting a perpetual character assassination in mass media, they tried[+][+] to block Donald Trump from the primary ballot to disqualify him from becoming president by invoking a provision of the US Constitution – Section 3 of the 14th Amendment5…
➡ The US is a dictatorship because US Supreme Court ruled that everything the President tells people to do is a lawful act, to include killing his political opponents[+][+].
➡ The EU Presidents, such as President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen since 2019, do not get elected by the public. People of the EU are never given a chance to vote to choose a President who is making most decisions, including about the war in Ukraine on behalf of the EU people! Who gives her the right to decide what most Europeans want? Certainly not the public as it is supposed to be in a democracy.
➡ “The right to a different opinion has ceased to exist in the EU”[»1:29] – the Prime Minister of Slovakia (part of the EU) Fico in June 2024 after surviving an assassination attempt.
➡ The EU threatened[+] to sabotage Hungary’s economy if Budapest blocks fresh aid to Ukraine in the next voting – is this democracy to blackmail[+] a country into voting a certain way? Brussels has outlined a strategy to explicitly target Hungary’s economic weaknesses, imperil its currency and drive a collapse in investor confidence in a bid to hurt “jobs and growth” if Budapest refuses to lift its veto against the aid to Kyiv.
➡ Members of the European Parliament demanded[+] that Hungary be stripped of its voting rights in the EU after Orbán's trips to Russia and China. Those “beacons of democracy” are showing their true colors by not allowing voting those who oppose them. EU officials are “saving” democracy … by removing voting rights of members[+]!
➡ The EU fined[+] Hungary for defending its borders against illegal immigrants, which Prime Minister Orban condemned[+] as “outrageous and unacceptable”. Hungary had to pay 200 million euros plus 1 million euros daily for not allowing and detaining illegal immigrants. In a clear Brussels overreach, this ruling proves how the EU states do not have sovereignty and freedom even to defend their own borders from illegal immigrants. If democracy means a tyranny of majority and foreigners determining a state’s security policies, then this is a twisted version of democracy.
➡ The EU threatened the Georgian Prime Minister Kobakhidze not to adopt the law on transparency of foreign funding of NGO's in Georgia – here is evidence[+][+][+][+] of European Commissioner for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Várhelyi threatening or intimidating Georgian PM warning him he could have the same fate as Slovakia's PM Fico who was shot in an assassination attempt just days before! WOW…the democratic process in the EU is truly inspiring! Democracy mafia style!
And EU Vice-President and Foreign Affairs Chief Josep Borrell tweeted[+] to Georgia: the “transparency of foreign influence” law is not in line with EU norms & values… We urge Leaders to refrain from adopting legislation that can compromise Georgia’s EU path. What gives the EU the right to meddle in Georgia's laws and sovereignty (Georgia is not part of the EU)?! Imagine if Putin did that!
And the US also threatened[+] with visa restrictions for Georgia's lawmakers responsible for "undermining democracy in Georgia" – when lawmakers of the governing Georgian Dream party want transparency about foreign governments funding of NGOs in their country is considered "undermining democracy" – this is all we need to know of Western pseudo-democracy. In response to US bully, ruling party official said[+] that country's “independence not for sale for any visa” – well done!
Also, if the transparency law (a.k.a. law on foreign agents) in Georgia was opposed and labeled “Russian law” by the Western officials[+][+][+][+] and mainstream media, then this is an indication that Russians promote transparency while the West opposes it, which revealed that Russia is more democratic than the West. This was re-affirmed by Georgians protesters waving the EU flags protesting for less transparency to ensure EU values (hello, Georgia is in Asia6) effectively shouting “We do not want our NGO funding to be transparent!”[+] EU values for all to know!
Illusion of Democracy
“I think America is already a pseudo-democracy”[»] – US Senator Bernie Sanders
We are about to expose the fake democracy in Ukraine but first we need to expose the Illusion Of Democracy for which the West supposedly supports the war instead of diplomacy in Ukraine.
But first, let's just highlight the phony fighters for democracy, that is, the illusory democrats who as a minority in some countries do not respect the main democratic principle of "majority rules". Just like in Ukraine during 2013 Euromaidan protests and 2014 revolution, when the protesters and revolutionaries were waving the EU flags and shouting democracy slogans and the US and EU officials interfered by backing the protesters going against the government, the same scenario has been playing out recently in Georgia where Western (NATO) countries have funded, orchestrated, and backed[»] a regime change operation so as to install their puppets in government. The protesters[»] were a minority, so if they really stand for democracy, they should respect the democratic principle of "majority rules". But Western officials and NGOs are funding and training them to protest, which is against the law, as foreign interference in domestic affairs is.
Romanian opposition leader banned
Brazilian opposition leader banned
French opposition leader banned
Ukraine suspended all elections
Moldova opposition party banned
Estonia and Latvia banned Russian ethnic minority from voting in elections
Georgia president refused to leave upon losing election
Germany tries to ban the most popular[+] party AfD
America tried to ban Trump
All in the name of saving democracy!
The US ruling classes, mostly the Democrats, had supported the war instead of diplomacy in Ukraine under their usual “fighting for democracy” banner but the illusion of democracy there is evident in the fact that the rich make all the rules as in plutocracy7 or oligarchy. Since all the mainstream media is controlled by the rich ruling classes, they easily create and maintain this illusion.
There is plenty evidence of the illusion of democracy in the US, so at random, we just feature the official statement[»] of US president himself, Donald Trump, who pointed out the weirdness of how Kamala Harris, who got no votes at all, got to become a presidential candidate”!
European countries are run by leaders whom most people do not support as evidenced by their low approval ratings[+][+][+] and the fact that most of them came to power through their party forming a coalition[+], or exposing the former ruling party as being horrible[+], or through a scheme8 rather than by gaining a support of the majority of people, so can anyone explain what is then the meaning of democracy if leaders with minority support run so-called democratic states? Democracy is supposed to be a government in which a majority rules but that is not the case in present-day so-called Western democratic countries that wage wars in the name of democracy. Democracy is not “the majority rule” anymore but increasingly defined and orchestrated by the western ruling elites and their institutions.
🇷🇺 Russia holds elections
The West: "Russia is a dictatorship"
🇺🇦 Ukraine doesn’t hold elections
The West: "Ukraine is a democracy"
🇬🇪 Georgia negates the election results
The West: "Georgia is protesting for a democracy"
🇷🇴 Romania cancels the election
The West: "Romania is defending democracy"
Furthermore, do you really need any more convincing about the Western ruling classes making every effort to lure masses into their fake version of democracy when the prominent mainstream media, make absurd claims such as:
· “Elections Are Bad for Democracy”[+] – The New York Times. They took away our right to freedom of speech and now they even want to take away people’s right to cast votes to elect their representatives.
· “Yes, there is such a thing as too much democracy”[+] and “America suffers from too much democracy”[+]– The Washington Post
Just imagine if Putin or other Russian authorities made claims like that! They would use it to prove that they are evil dictators but when Americans say things like that, we are all supposed to just take it and agree with it – insane! Can you believe that there are actually people in the West who buy these papers and actually pay to read this anti-democracy propaganda and still think that American-style democracy is better than Russian one?
The illusion of democracy in the EU for which the EU allegedly supports the war instead of diplomacy in Ukraine is most evident in the fact that the EU president is never elected by the public but chosen by the elites. So, the plagiarist[+], lawbreaker[+] gynecologist-turned-president Ursula von der Leyen[+] (on the board of trustees[+] of WEF9) is NOT democratically elected EU President – people of the EU are never given a chance to vote to choose a President who has been making most decisions about the war in Ukraine on behalf of the EU people!!!
here Ursula von der Leyen sits next to the WEF founder Klaus Schwab and his wife
Who gave her the right to spend our taxpayers' money to buy weapons to get both Russians and Ukrainians as well as many other European fighters killed??? WEF10. Von der Leyen is a German gynecologist-turned-politician who has been serving as the 13th president of the European Commission since 2019 but we, the people, never gave her any rights to represent or lead us, especially not in matters of life and death.
In the US, people have at least the right to elect a President but people in the EU do not have that right! Is this democracy?! NO. Believe it or not, most people in Europe didn't even know her name before 2022 when von der Leyen started to appear in the mass media speaking in the name of the EU people who never knew her let alone elected her. Due to her many lies11, fraud such as plagiarism[+], and speaking in the name of Europeans who never gave her that right, she got a nickname: von der Lying[+][+].
We’d like to know on what merit did she deserve to become President – what has this previously anonymous gynecologist ever done of value to be appointed to the highest office in the EU not once but for the second term?! Germans disapprove of her and were against her becoming the President for many reasons[+], which came down to her corruption and incompetence in her previous positions such as the Defense Minister.
She was a total failure in her prior post as a German Defense Minister (was the worst or the weakest minister[+] and left the Bundeswehr in a catastrophic condition), therefore a part of the German government coalition opposed her nomination, which is why the German Chancellor Angela Merkel abstained during the council's vote on the proposal[+] – it was very embarrassing for von der Leyen but she got selected anyway. Wonder how. Hint: she was on board of WEF.
There is no other explanation why von der Leyen became the EU President but, like Jose Manuel Barroso[+] before her, through WEF[+] endorsement. WEF with its numerous affiliates is a major sponsor of the EU institutions, which is why it controls the EU to a great extent.
German founder of WEF, Jesuit-educated[+][+], Klaus Schwab has helped to instate many of his puppets (attendants of the WEF “Young Global Leaders” program[+][+]) as heads of state and other institutions, including Trudeau[+] and Freeland[+] in Canada, Sarkozy[+] and Macron[+] in France, BoJo[+], Truss and Sunak[+] in the UK, Rutte[+][+] in the Netherlands and as NATO chief, Sanna Marin[+][+] in Finland, Ardern[»] in New Zealand, Lula da Silva[+] in Brazil, Queen Rania of Jordan[+], former Chancellor Angela Merkel[+] and Annalena Baerbock[+][+]in Germany, Laurence D. Fink[+] - BlackRock Chairman and CEO, Kristalina Georgieva – IMF Director, Christine Lagarde[+] – President of European Central Bank, Sadhguru[+], etc.[+][+].
Schwab's organization has infiltrated in many governments and the UN[+]12 to execute “The Great Reset”[+][+] as part of its globalist, liberal or NWO13 agenda, but the merger of corporate and government power is known as fascism. With all the sophisticated tools to manipulate the public opinion and rig elections, as well as the value of campaign funding or sponsors, there are no elections; only selections.
Fascism is the incorporation of government and (big) business.
Zelensky is also an acolyte[+][+][+][+][+][+][+] of Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum (WEF), implementing its anti-democratic globalist ‘Great Reset’ agenda of technocratic totalitarianism. Among many others, Leon Kushner[+], a writer who was raised by Jewish Holocaust survivors from Ukraine, claimed: “Since 2014 oligarchs run it mob style and chose the then actor Zelensky to be their presidential puppet. The WEF’s Klaus Schwab bragged about helping elect him and his equivalent Canadian puppet, Trudeau.” His claim can be further corroborated by the fact that, despite the war, Zelensky fully carries out[+][+][+][+][+][+][»] the WEF’s globalist agenda[?] (although at the time of war, his government should have other priorities) as well as its ideology[?] and is hailed by all the fellow WEF “Young global leaders” and other globalists with the same talking points as if they all got the same memo from Schwab on what to do and say about Zelensky and Putin to further this cult’s[+] bid for global domination, for which Russia and China stand in the way and therefore are vilified so as to contain their advancement and growth.
So, this formerly unknown-to-the-EU-people WEF stooge, lawbreaker[+], and plagiarist[+] von der Leyen has been calling most or all the shots regarding a crisis that might end in a nuclear cataclysm due to the policies she has been pushing and all “in the name of democracy” that she herself, as undemocratically appointed chief, never exercised to come to power! Whatever policies the member of the board of trustees[+] of WEF, von der Leyen has been enacting is not the will of the EU people! How is then the EU a democracy?! EU is a pseudo-democracy, that is what it is.
Here is evidence[»][»] of Ursula von der Leyen, the unelected head of the EU, directly meddling into Italian elections by warning ahead of election that if any nation (Italy but she also mentioned Hungary and Poland) votes the ‘wrong’ way, meaning not in line with Brussels’ dictates, the EU will crack down: "We have tools". Democracy be damned, obedience comes first. Her “tools” evidently worked as the new elected Italian PM Meloni fell in line preventing her from pursuing conservative policies.
With more than 68.000 people freezing to death[+] due to sanctions in winter 2022/2023, massive homelessness rise[+], and enormous decline in living standards, it is clear that Brussels does not have the best interest of the peoples of Europe at heart. EU people constantly protest on the streets and on social media against supplying Ukraine with weapons and sanctions[+][+][+][»][»][»], and in general against Ukraine[ꚛ], with the growing Rebellion for Peace and German Manifesto for Peace[+] being one of the most signed petitions[+] on Change.org calling on the German Chancellor to stop the arms deliveries, a ceasefire, and for peace negotiations. People should have a say in spending billions of taxpayers' money on weapons for Ukraine that kill people and get quickly destroyed by Russia but no one asks them and ignore and suppress their protests – is this democracy?
Ursula von der Leyen had the nerve to declare[»] that “the war in Ukraine is about autocracy against democracy” although she herself was never democratically elected to become a President! Moreover, Ukraine's democracy is a travesty – the mere fact that (under the US and EU patronage) for many years even before the war, Ukraine has been the most corrupt[+]and the poorest country in Europe[+][+] that issued laws against ethnic minorities, it could indicate to intelligent people that there is something wrong with that country and its government that has no democracy.
Not an irrelevant fact is that ever since the first EU President took office in 1958, there was never a Slav or Eastern European President of the EU[+] (Slavs or Eastern Europeans started to join the EU since 2004, save for Greece that joined in 1981), which says a lot, too. The only Slavs and Eastern Europeans who get a say in EU policies are corrupt politicians, bribed to serve the interests of the Anglo-Saxons14.
The West’s democratic illusion is further exposed by its selective outrage, condemning Russia’s actions while ignoring its own violations, such as the support for regimes that oppress minorities. The West’s claim to democratic superiority, so loudly proclaimed, is but a hollow shell is a hollow boast when its own systems silence dissent and marginalize those who challenge the prevailing order. Nowhere is this sham and illusion of democracy more evident than in Estonia and Latvia[+][+], where Russian-speaking minorities are systematically crushed under democracy’s righteous heel, facing systemic exclusion under the guise of national security. Since 1992, ~19% of Estonia’s and ~29% of Latvia’s populations (now ~6% and ~10–12%, respectively), mostly ethnic Russians, have been branded as ‘non-citizens,’ stripped of citizenship and barred from national elections (and local elections in Estonia since 2025[+]) – being punished not for what they did but for what they are. That policy has all the hallmarks of discrimination or racism and undermines the democratic principles these nations claim to uphold. Such practices expose the hollowness of the democracy-versus-autocracy narrative, as NATO allies engage in the very oppression they condemn in others. Western democracies tout their commitment to freedom and equality, yet they silence voices that challenge their narratives, exposing the illusion of their moral high ground.
Furthermore, EU sanctions and bans on Russian media and civilians, from Latvia’s censorship of Russian-language channels to Estonia’s cultural curbs, punish Russians broadly, not for deeds but for their ethnicity, echoing the Russophobia and racism. Such ethnic targeting, flouting EU Charter’s Article 21, exposes the West’s sanctimonious democratic boasts as a sham, cloaking discrimination in democratic rhetoric. These injustices reveal the West’s democracy as a mere illusion, propped up by hypocrisy and selective moral outrage – a democracy that preaches fairness and condemns Russia while practicing exclusion.
Apart from them being undemocratic, these racist policies (undermining equal representation by disenfranchising significant minorities, non-discrimination by disproportionately affecting Russian-speakers, freedom of expression through media bans, and proportionality by applying blanket measures without individual justification) violate laws and legal norms such as the ICERD’s ethnic discrimination ban, FCNM (Articles 4, 14, 15) by limiting minority participation, education, and media access; ECHR (Articles 10, 14) by discrimination and media bans; and ICCPR (Articles 25, 26, 27) by creating barriers to political and cultural rights[+], EU Charter (Article 21)…
According to leading Western analysts of global democracy[+][+], only 8% of the world’s population lives in a full, functioning democracy. More than half of the EU[ꚛ] doesn't have a functioning democracy. So, the EU's alleged fight for democracy is the same smoke mirror that the US uses for decades to fight wars and kill people around the world all under the banner of the so-called “fight for democracy” – what democracy? There is no democracy in the EU when we cannot even choose a President!
We do not know of any polls on the perception of democracy being done in the EU, but in the US, who serves as a role model for democracy, only about one in 10 American adults can give democracy in the US a high rating, according to a poll[+] from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research published in July 2023. Would you buy a product if only a tenth of people approve of it, and most do not? Overall, about half the US says democracy is not working well at all in the US.
A mere look at the streets[»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»] and ghettos[»][»] of America is exposing how fake or faulty their “liberal democracy” is, especially comparing it to, say, Russian[»][»][»][»][»] or Chinese cities’ streets[»][»][»][»][»] (obviously, all cities have bad parts but in the US is horrific), one would say conservative autocracy does better for its people. Many US streets look impoverished like a so-called third-world country[»] and are filled with homeless[»][»][»][»], junkies, retards, and such but even worse are daily scenes of urban thefts[»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»], casual killings[»][»][»][»][»][»], and other crimes[»][»], as well as social decay[»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][ꚛ][ꚛ][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][ꚛ][ꚛ][ꚛ][ꚛ][+][»][»][ꚛ], where pedophilia is not a crime but an identity[»] and a mere sexual orientation[»][»], child porn is no longer crime[ꚛ], which all makes democracy seem undesirable and exposes the American “civil society” and their fake prosperity to which Ukrainians foolishly aspire. For anyone who has succumbed to American or Western propaganda about “autocratic” Russia being poor and backward, just have a look at these videos[»][»] to realize how beautiful Russia is and how your government and its institutions and media have been lying to you.
Because it is important, we repeat the paragraph from our article on the Core Concepts[*] that also exposes the illusion of democracy:
What do those, who believe they are dying or suffering for democracy, really have from it? A chance to vote for a person in 4-6 years, who turns out to be different than expected and does not keep his/her promises. The elected president gets richer, more power and fame but what do voters really get from it? Have voters ever gotten a better life because they got a chance to vote?
In American-style democracy, with a two-party system, a majority rules, a.k.a. the tyranny of the majority[+], so many people lose elections and so are harmed by democracy because the governing opposition party or coalition does not serve their interests. Is it worth dying for such system? Not for the minorities.
In European-style democracy, it is even worse because in European states, there are multiple parties, so in the end the one that gets a majority of seats or votes in the parliament represents only a minority of people. This means that a minority gets to decide how a majority of people should live — how is this a fair democracy???
For instance, 2024 United Kingdom general election[+] – the super low voter turnout of just 60%. 34% vote share with a 60% turnout is hardly a ringing endorsement from the majority in the country. Lowest voter turnout since 1945! Essentially a 40% vote for "none of the above". Most interesting or rather shocking is the fact that the party that won with less than 34% of the votes won 63% of the seats in the parliament[v] – British democracy for you! Labour party got 9,7 million votes while Conservatives got 6,8 million votes but Labour got 411 seats while Conservatives got just 121 seats. And Reform party got 4,1 million votes but got only 5 seats. Liberal Democrats got less votes than Reform but got much more seats – with 3,5 million votes, it got 72 seats in the parliament! Another important point is that UK has 48,2 million registered voters and out of that only 9,7 million of them voted for Labour party, which is just 20% of British voters but they run the country anyway – do you see how illusory democracy in the UK is? It is not that majority of people get to decide who should run the government but the FPTP[+] system decides it
Another example is 2024 French legislative election[+] – with a 67% turnout, Marine Le Pen's party National Rally with allies got the most votes – 10,6 million in the 1st round and 10,1 million in the 2nd round but the New Popular Front (the left coalition including the communists) with just 7 million votes came on top with the most seats in the parliament – how is this fair? Macron’s party got only 6,7 million votes but came second place. So, out of 27,3 million voters or 43,3 million registered voters, the new ruling party NPF was supported by only 7 million voters, which is 16% – that means that 16% people decide what other 84% people should obey. Is this a type of democracy worth dying for?
Democracy is a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives. That's all it is. Russia is no less a democracy than Ukraine. Only, in Russia, most of natural resources are nationalized, owned by the people rather than oligarchs or private companies, which is good for the whole state because this way no foreigner can directly or indirectly plunder their country's natural resources and assets, including bribing the corrupt local officials to sell the country's valuable resources at the rock-bottom prices.
This is why the West “fights for democracy” in the world – so that they can go and bribe corrupt politicians into exploiting their resources – why else a country should care if another country is democratic or communist?! Consider why are the US and some former colonial Western powers (allied in NATO) so keen to establish democracy all over the planet? Why do they care if some foreign country is democratic or not to such an extent that they are ready to invest billions in the effort and send their men to fight and die for it? Ponder on that. If you wish a short cut in contemplating, here is an answer: because democracy status of countries allows them to bribe the local politicians into selling off their country's valuable natural resources at a minimum price.
But they can't do that in Russia and many authoritarian and communist countries with strong, uncorrupt, unsubordinated leaders because the system, laws, and values are different and Russians don't allow foreign interference, foreign domination, and neocolonialism. Autocracy is also like that because it is a state or society governed by one person with absolute power, who is so rich and powerful that foreign predators can't bribe him into robbing the country's resources.
Here is plenty of evidence[»][»][+][+][+]of the illusion of democracy with Western “democrats” interfering in democratic processes across the globe by orchestrating and funding so-called protests or revolutions (but in fact violent riots) in their regime change operations.
So, in communism and autocracy, the state's natural resources do not get taken away like it happened in Ukraine where Zelensky sold off most of Ukrainian natural resources and agricultural land to Western predators after introducing a Land Reform in 2019. It is much better to be ruled by a good autocrat than a bunch of greedy, lying politicians a puppet like Zelensky. So, why do Ukrainians and foreign mercenaries believe that democracy is a worthy cause to die or suffer for? Because they are mentally challenged and so brainwashed by their unelected “democratic” leaders that they can't think clearly. Anyone who expects mercenaries to act morally has not understood the business they are in and what type of person choses to kill for a living.
The EU President Ursula von der Leyen was not elected, British Prime Minister Sunak was not elected, the US President Biden was allegedly not elected either if we are to believe that the US 2020 election was rigged, and many who are officially “elected”, including Zelensky, are only those whom Western sponsors backed to run such a campaign that gets to manipulate the electorate the most. The election process in so-called democracy is all about who has the most money to invest in the best running campaign. Because, we don't really know the people we vote for in a democratic election. We only know their image, which is crafted by expensive specialists and promoted with expensive ad campaigns and disinformation operations.
The best thinkers or philosophers in the history of mankind, Socrates and Plato, among many others, advised against democracy! Socrates is considered to be one of the wisest people ever lived. If you haven’t already, watch here[»] “Why Socrates Hated Democracy”. Plato was another ancient Greek philosopher who is considered a top thinker, so watch here[»]“Why Plato Loathed Democracy – Why Democracy Doesn't Work: 4 Lessons from Plato's Republic”, or here[»] “Why Socrates & Plato hated democracy?”, or the “Criticism of democracy” on Wikipedia[+]. Be wise rather than stupid enough to fight or die or suffer for something wise people caution against.
Democracy has been turned into a poison sword by the greedy Western ruling elites.
Hans-Hermann Hoppe wrote in ‘Democracy: the God That Failed’ (free e-book here[+][+]): "Democracy has nothing to do with freedom. Democracy is a soft variant of communism, and rarely in the history of ideas has it been taken for anything else". "I'm not telling you, 'let's stop with the democracy,' but let's think about that, because the majority is not right all the time."
Evidence That Ukraine Is No Democracy but Autocracy
Ukraine is no democracy but autocracy, according to renowned Western sources[+][+][+][+][+][+]. It is an impoverished, corrupt, one-party state with extensive censorship[+], where opposition newspapers and political parties have been shut down[+]. How is this a democracy?
"In reality, Ukraine already is a dictatorship" – arrested Ukrainian Parliament deputy Alexander Dubinsky[»]
US President Donald Trump called[+] Zelensky a "dictator" who risks losing his country if he does not act fast (negotiate a peace deal).
When a US-backed government seized power in Kyiv following the Euromaidan regime change operation of 2013-14, Ukraine’s government embarked on a nationwide purge of political elements deemed pro-Russian or insufficiently nationalistic[+]. How is this a democracy? How can they blame Putin for doing the same on a much smaller scale?!
Among the NATO propagandists and those who fall for NATO propaganda there is much pushback on claims that Zelensky is a dictator because for them he is a hero (a narrative that we debunked in a separate article[*]) or an ally or an “useful idiot”. Therefore, we address all their doubts and arguments here, which no one in their right mind and clear conscience can deny.
Zelensky has framed[+] his country’s war against Russia as a battle for democracy itself but his definition of democracy is utterly twisted. While claiming to defend democracy, Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky has impeded the Constitutional Court, outlawed his opposition, ordered his rivals’ arrest[+], indicted anyone who opposes him as a traitor (such as MPs Yevhen Shevchenko[+], Viktor Medvedchuk[+][ꚛ]…), and presided over the disappearance and assassination of dissidents across the country[+]. Whoever opposed Zelensky or some of his policies was immediately fired[*] or arrested and charged either for treason or corruption. Any opponent to the Kyiv regime is declared a traitor or Russian collaborator, hunted down[+] and arrested[+].
Like a true dictator, in October 2020, Zelensky dismissed[+] first the rulings of the Constitutional Court (it invalidated[+] a large part of the anti-corruption legislation) and then the Court itself!
On 29 October 2020, Zelensky submitted a draft law no 4288 'On the renewal of public confidence in the constitutional judiciary' to the parliament to declare the Court’s decision null and void. Also, he called upon the parliament to terminate the powers of the judges of the Constitutional Court.
By his decree of 29 December 2020, No. 607/2020 'On the dismissal of a judge of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine', from the moment of its adoption," Zelensky completely unconstitutionally recalled the chairman of the Constitutional Court –Oleksandr Tupytsky in March 2021.
He had no right to do any of this. He has no such powers. Zelensky violated Ukraine’s constitution, which states (Article 149-1 of the Constitution; Article 21 of the Law ‘On the Constitutional Court of Ukraine’) that Constitutional Court judges can only be fired by a vote of two-thirds of their colleagues and not by the President, which was aimed to ensure the Court’s independence. Of course, the Constitutional Court declared this presidential decree illegal and rejected it, which created a conflict between the court and the president. In addition, judge Tupytsky claimed that since the Procuracy General failed to notify him of a suspicion within the procedures, he does not have the status of suspect. Thus, Zelensky’s Decree on his suspension is not only unconstitutional, but also illegal in terms of criminal procedural law[+]. In January 2021, President Zelensky had to recall[+] from the parliament his bill No. 4288 on terminating the powers of Constitutional Court judges.
Zelensky’s clash with the Constitutional Court, refusal to hold elections, and persecution of his political opponents has all the earmarks of dictatorship. Zelensky just makes laws as he pleases like a true dictator.
First, he passed or reinforced laws, banning a language[+][+][+], then a Church[+], then media outlets and opposition parties[+], then even elections[+]. Then, he passed laws[+]with severe restrictions on Russian books and music. Then, he passed laws[+][+][+] prohibiting his citizens to leave the country escaping his dictatorship, violating their human rights[+]. Then, he passed a law[+] that Ukraine doesn't have to pay its foreign debts.
Anyone who is claiming that Putin is a dictator for whichever reasons, for the very same reasons should also declare Zelensky a dictator as well because all that Putin is condemned for doing, Zelensky has done even more – avoiding democratic elections is just one point on a long list of dictatorial characteristics, such as exceedingly suppressing, eradicating, persecuting, and prosecuting political opposition[+][+][+], journalists[+], activists, and protesters, shutting down all independent media, banning opposition parties[+][+], banning the church, kidnapping[»][»][»][»][»][ꚛ][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»] hundreds of thousands of civilians to force them to fight for him, torturing citizens to death for contradicting the Kyiv narrative, persecuting the bloggers[+] for posting videos of real events[+] (opposing the Kyiv's narrative), no freedom of speech[»], corruption[+][+] in overdrive with evidence of Zelensky being corrupt[+][+][+][+] and surrounding himself with corrupt people[+][+][+] as well as not carrying out his pledge to fight corruption[+], etc.
Here are some renowned authorities calling Zelensky a "dictator":
➡ US President Trump called[»][+][+»] Zelensky a "dictator".
➡ Tulsi Gabbard, director of national intelligence and former U.S. Congresswoman has explained[»] how Zelensky is a dictator, citing his suspension of elections and media crackdowns.
➡ Marjorie Taylor Greene, Member of the U.S. House of Representatives, has referred[+][+] to Zelensky as a dictator who banned free and fair elections.
➡ Elon Musk, American oligarch (CEO of Tesla, Owner of X) amplified the "dictator" label indirectly by endorsing or sharing[+]a blogger’s post a post on his social media platform X calling Zelensky a dictator, and he suggested offering Zelensky amnesty in a neutral country in exchange for “transition back to democracy in Ukraine.”
➡ Tucker Carlson, conservative US political commentator, called[+][+] Zelensky "a dictator".
➡ Piers Morgan, British journalist, ambiguously wrote[+]“Spoken like a true dictator!” in response to a Zelensky’s cunning statement about resigning in exchange for NATO membership (that would not bring peace but escalate the conflict because it would trigger NATO’s Article 5 collective defense clause, obligating all members to defend Ukraine militarily against Russia). Knowing how slim the chances are of Ukraine being admitted to NATO, given it does not meet several membership criteria, lack of consensus among NATO members, and constant rejections, Zelensky’s offer was insincere and a mere PR stunt or power play – a manipulative tactic, tying his personal position to a national security goal. Dictators often use such grand gestures to consolidate power or shift blame.
➡ Bob Amsterdam, a US human rights lawyer who has worked in Ukraine, said[+] that calling Zelensky a dictator is, if anything, an understatement
➡ Oleksii Arestovych, Zelensky's former chief of staff and presidential candidate, described[+][+][+] Zelensky as a “dictator”.
➡ Călin Georgescu, Romanian Presidential candidate, called[+] Zelensky a "semi-dictator".
No Russian or Chinese leaders have ever labeled him as “dictator” as they are genuine diplomats who never insult individual heads of state.
Ukraine has always had more pro-Russian than pro-Western citizens, as polls[+][+][+] and voting for pro-Russian president and party[+]have shown (before the Maidan revolution in 2014 when they banned all pro-Russian parties), therefore there are a lot of people who are against the anti-Russian Kyiv regime. Zelensky administration has authorized a campaign of kidnapping[»][»][»][»][»][ꚛ][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»], torture, and assassination of local Ukrainian lawmakers accused of allegedly collaborating with Russia. In the first two months of Russian SMO, eleven mayors and many other Ukrainian officials were killed[+] by Ukrainian state agents as their only crime was engaging in de-escalation talks with Russia.
Zelensky has further exploited the atmosphere of war to outlaw an array of opposition parties and order the arrest of his leading rivals[+]. His authoritarian decrees have triggered the disappearance, torture, and even murder of an array of human rights activists, communist and leftist organizers, journalists[+], and government officials accused of “pro-Russian” sympathies. While Zelensky spouts clichés about the defense of democracy before worshipful Western audiences, he is using the war as a theater for enacting a blood-drenched purge of political rivals, dissidents, and critics.
On the battlefield, the Ukrainian military has engaged in a series of atrocities against captured Russian troops[+][+][»] and proudly exhibited its sadistic acts on social media[»][»][»][»][+]. Here too, the perpetrators of human rights abuses have received approval from the upper echelons of Ukrainian leadership. Ukrainian soldiers’ use of the cellphones of dead Russian soldiers to mock and hector their relatives appears to be a common practice. In fact, the Ukrainian government has begun using notoriously invasive facial recognition technology[+] from Clearview AI[+], a US tech company, to identify Russian casualties and taunt their relatives on social media.
“The war is being used to kidnap, imprison and even kill opposition members who express themselves critical of the government,” a left-wing activist beaten and persecuted by Ukraine’s security services commented[+] in April 2022. “We must all fear for our freedom and our lives.”
On Ukrainian TV, a Ukrainian deputy from the Servant of the People Oleg Dunda declared[»][»] that “There should be no freedom of speech during war.” Truly democratic values, for sure. Imagine if Putin or a Russian deputy would say that! All Western mass media would run it as a headline and a proof that Russia is a dictatorship, but when Kyiv does that, such claims are buried, of course, which is evidence how much the West really cares for free speech and democratic values.
Kyiv regime claims they are fighting for freedom but they banned men from leaving the country and since June 2025, plan to ban[»] young girls between the ages of 18 and 27, too. Ukraine's Minister for European Integration Olga Stefanyshyna has launched an initiative to ban Ukrainian girls from leaving the country and has already received support in the parliament.
Ukrainians are often depicted to be defending freedom and democracy against evil and autocracy, despite all the Western experts[+][+][+][+][+][+]designating Ukraine as an autocracy. And despite all the evidence of Ukraine being a non-democratic authoritarian state:
➡ US-backed corrupt politicians came to power through revolutions or coups rather than through democratic ways and stayed in power only because they eliminated and banned the major opposition parties and candidates. Since 2004 there were two US-funded revolutions (2004 and 2014), which blatantly discarded democratic processes and installed new US-puppet regimes via violence and fraud.
➡ political persecution – like a dictator, Ukrainian President Zelensky sacks or persecutes and prosecutes his political rivals[+] and anyone who criticizes him
🔵 since the US organized[*] a coup or a revolution in February 2014 to install an anti-Russian government, in a country with around eight million ethnic Russians and more than half of the country being pro-Russian (according to Kyiv International Institute of Sociology – KIIS opinion polls[+][+][+]) and voting for pro-Russian president and party[+], all pro-Russian political parties and presidential candidates were either banned or prevented to participate in elections – is that democratic?! For instance, the pro-Russian Party of Regions[+] was the most popular[+][+][+] political party in Ukraine until 2014 (since 2006, it won all three parliamentary elections) but then suddenly ceased to be active until it was banned. On 20 March 2022, President Volodymyr Zelensky banned 11 other pro-Russian political parties[+], only pro-Western parties are allowed – is this how democratic leaders act?
🔵The Ukrainian government enacted authoritarian laws to gain an absolute monopoly on power – the suppression, eradication, persecution, and prosecution of political opposition and dissent[+][+][+] E.g., in 2014, they outlawed the Communist Party and several pro-Russian parties banning them from running candidates in elections. Is this democracy? In May 2022, Zelensky enacted a law that allowed him to ban any political parties merely accused of being “pro-Russian,” without any right to appeal. In March 2022, Ukraine suspended 11 political opposition parties[+], including OPZZh, the second biggest party in terms of parliamentary seats and banned them from any political activity. Since then, in total, 19[+][+] pro-Russian political parties have been prohibited in Ukraine and their assets seized by the state. And all this while fascist groups and parties such as Azov, Svoboda, and Right Sector are permitted to exist and even given weapons and funds. Anyone opposing Zelensky's autocratic regime is labeled pro-Russian, some or many of whom might even be pro-Russian rather than pro-NATO, why not. How many opposition parties does Zelensky regime has to ban for the West to realize that there is no democracy in Ukraine???
Whoever assumes that Putin killed or jailed many of his political rivals, then to be fair, they should also assume the same for Zelensky’s critics and rivals who were killed or detained that Zelensky personally did it. For obvious reasons in information warfare, “Zelensky did it” narratives are totally absent in the media in NATO countries whereas “Putin did it” narratives abound. For the truth about the Zelensky regime and its political reprisals against dissidents, google these names – if you care about the fate of Navalny, then you should also care about the fate of those opposition figures and rivals that Zelensky regime either murdered or detained:
🏴 Murdered by Kyiv regime:
Volodymyr Struk[+] – (kidnapped and murdered mayor of Kreminna in the Lugansk People’s Republic[+]
Denys Kireev[+] – top member of the Ukrainian negotiating team killed in Kyiv after the first round of talks with Russia
Davyd Zhvania – a critic of Zelensky, former MP and Emergency Minister of Ukraine killed in a car bomb explosion[+] after he offered evidence against the administration but blamed on Russian shelling; he had Russian citizenship
Oleksiy Vadatursky – agricultural tycoon and Yanukovych ally killed by missile strike targeting his home[+]
Denys Monastyrsky – Ukraine’s Interior Minister, killed in a helicopter crash[+]; he was investigating illegal arms sales to Africa, Chad. When Russian politicians die in an accident, Western media immediately accuses Putin of killing them, thus by the same logic, it can be also said that Zelensky killed him and his aides.
Yevhen Yenin – Deputy Minister of Internal Affairs, killed in a helicopter crash[+])
Yurii Lubkovych – State Secretary of Internal Affairs, killed in a helicopter crash[+])
Ilya Kiva/Kyva – former Ukrainian MP whose opposition party Zelensky banned, fled to Russia due to his fierce criticism of Zelensky, was shot dead[+][+][+] by Ukrainian SBU in Moscow Region in December 2023
Oleksii Kovalov – Ukrainian MP was shot dead[+] in attack on his residence in Kherson
Oleksandr Rzhavskyy – former MP, a critic of Zelensky, pro-Russian[+] Ukrainian politician was killed in Bucha massacre, which also proves that Ukrainians did it but blamed it on the Russians, as why would Russians kill a pro-Russian official?!
Gonzalo Lopez Lira – American journalist, died in detention in Kharkiv after criticizing Zelensky and Biden
Sergei Gorenko – the Prosecutor General of the Luhansk People's Republic was killed[+] in an explosion in the department's building
Andrey Portnov – former advisor to Ukrainian president Yanukovych was assassinated[+] in Madrid
27+ other Ukrainian officials[+] who defected to Russia were either killed or attempted[+][+][+][+][+] by Kyiv regime forces in 2022 alone
🚩 Disappeared (presumably murdered):
Dmitri Djangirov[+] – Ukrainian journalist, director of 1+1, a Ukrainian state television channel, and political scientist disappeared[+] after being apprehended by SBU
Aleksandr Karevin – disappeared[+] captured historian and publicist
Oleg Novikov – former deputy of the district council, person with disabilities detained and disappeared[+]
Elena Berezhnaya[+] – Russian Olympic champion skater, Ukrainian human rights defender and anti-fascist activist was arrested by SBU and disappeared[+]
11 mayors from various towns in Ukraine disappeared[+] by April 2022, presumably killed or extrajudicially detained
Joke of the day:
President Zelensky shows up in one of the Kyiv's primary schools.
After the welcoming ceremony there is some time for the students to ask the President a few questions.
Little Ihor stands up and says: I only have 2 questions:
1. Why did Russia take over the Crimea?
2. What are Ukrainian soldiers doing in Kursk region?
Before Zelensky was able to say anything the bell suddenly rang, and all the students went for a break.
After the break, when everyone was back, a different student stood up and said:
Dear Mr. President, I have only four questions:
1. Why did Russia take over the Crimea?
2. What are Ukrainian soldiers doing in Kursk region?
3. Why did the bell rang 20 minutes early?
4. Where is Ihor?
🔗 Detained:
Viktor Medvedchuk[+][ꚛ] – an opposition leader and Ukrainian MP that Zelensky got arrested in April 2022 and was released in September 2022, as part of a prisoner swap
Mikhail & Aleksander Kononovich[+] – brothers who are leaders of a youth wing of the banned Communist Party of Ukraine, arrested and detained; their condition is unknown
Artem Dmytruk – detained Ukrainian MPabducted[+][+] in March 2022 and was tortured[+] for criticizing Zelensky, he fled[+] Ukraine after threats[+] tied to his support for the Ukrainian Orthodox Church
Yevhen Shevchenko – Ukrainian MP tortured[+] and jailed[+] in November 2024 for treason for supporting Trump[+], Lukashenko[+] and criticizing Andriy Yermak[+]
Vitaliy Grushevsky – detained Ukrainian was abducted and tortured by the SBU for criticizing the authorities and engaging in political activity[+]
Evgueniy Muraev – accused of high treason former Ukrainian MP, leader of the now‑banned party "Nashi"
Ihor Kolomoyskyi[+] – Jewish oligarch who used to be Zelensky's boss and instrumental in him becoming a president; arrested in September 2023 on charges of money laundering and fraud, and later charged also for embezzlement and ordering the contract killing
Yan Taksyur[+] – a journalist popular within the Ukrainian Christian Orthodox community was rounded up by SBU forces in Kyiv on and detained without any official charges
Viktor Shestakov – detained journalist, head of the Russian community in the Poltava Oblast
Sergei Shubin –head of the Department of Humanities of the Nikolaev Institute of Law was sentenced to 15 years in prison[+]
Aleksander Bryukhanov – detained mayor of Yuzhnoye[+]
Aleksander Zamiraylo –detained Cherkasy City Council deputy from the "Opposition Platform – For Life"[+]
Ilya Karamalikov – detained Kherson City Council deputy[+]); Vladimir Klimenko (detained Mariupol City Council deputy[+]
political analyst Mykhailo Pohrebynskyi, politician Vasyl Volha, Yurii Dudkyn, Dmytro Skvortsov[+], famous influencer Anna Alkhim[+], and the list goes on and on[+][+][+][+]. Read UN reports: Report 1[+] and Report 2[+]
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken condemned[+] Russian President Putin for arresting political opposition when in August 2023, US-puppet pro-West Aleksey Navalny[+][+] was sentenced to a further 19 years in prison (on charges of extremism this time; previous charges were on embezzlement). Navalny was one of Putin’s weakest political opponent15, so he never posed any threat to Putin and all other ones are alive and kicking. Butwhy didn't Blinken condemn Zelensky when he got opposition politician (the founder of the second largest party in Ukraine) Viktor Medvedchuk[+][ꚛ] or US journalist Gonzalo Lira arrested and tortured to death[+], or attempted to arrest his rival former president Poroshenko[+], or when Ukrainian politician Ilya Kyva and peace negotiator Denis Kireev were killed by the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU), or when he banned 11 political opposition parties?! The US has many political prisoners[+], too. With such hypocrites leading the US, no wonder the world is outraged by American double standards.
Time for a humor break :)
In a recent interview, Zelensky was accused of imprisoning political opponents.
"This is complete nonsense!" Replied Zelensky, "I have never considered anyone an opponent!"
🔵 Zelensky fires[*] anyone who criticizes him, such as the country’s ambassador to the United Kingdom, Vadim Pristaiko[+], after he described Zelensky’s response to UK Secretary of State for Defense Ben Wallace as "a little bit of sarcasm." Wallace, too, had to step down for it[+][+]. He also jailed his former boss and patron who made him into President, oligarch Ihor Kolomoisky. Another instance is when in May 2024, The Jerusalem Post wrote[+] that Zelensky keeps firing his closest advisers and assistants, including fellow Jew Serhiy Shefir, his right-hand man since 2019. Usually, he just accuses his critics of corruption or treason to get away with it. However, considering the vast amount of people he sacks all the time, one has to question whether this is due to him being authoritarian or just dumb (because he hires wrong people all the time, whom he has to later fire).
🔵 Zelensky keeps firing his team members all the time or forcing them to resign. Some notable fired officials charged conveniently for either corruption or treason (collaboration with Russia) or incompetence are his Chief of Staff Andriy Bohdan[+], Head of the Constitutional Court Oleksandr Tupytsky[+], Ukraine's joint forces commander Major General Eduard Moskalyov[+], Deputy Minister for Development of Communities and Territories Ivan Lukeryu and Vyacheslav Negoda, Deputy Minister for Social Policy Vitaliy Muzychenk, five regional governors of Dnipropetrovsk, Zaporizhzhia, Kyiv, Sumy, and Kherson[+], Deputy Prosecutor General Oleksiy Symonenko, Prosecutor General Iryna Venediktova[+], the Head of Ukraine's Security Agency, the SBU Ivan Bakanov[+], ambassador to the UK Vadym Prystaiko[+], MP & Deputy chief of Ukraine's Committee of National Security, Defense, and Intelligence Yuriy Aristov, Heads Of Military Enlistment[+], Defence Minister Oleksii Reznikov[+] with all of 6 Deputy Defense Ministers including Hanna Maliar and the State Secretary of the Ministry of Defence Oleksandrovych[+], American transgender Ukrainian military spokesman Sarah Ashton-Cirillo[+], the heads of all the regional draft offices, the Commander of the Ukraine's Territorial Defence Forces General Tantsyura[+], commander of the AFU special operations forces Viktor Khorenko, Medical Forces commander Major-General Tatyana Ostashchenko, Ukraine’s cyber security chief[+]Yury Shchyhol and his deputy Viktor Zhora, commander of Ukraine's Logistics Forces Oleh Huliak, Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Gen. Valerii Zaluzhnyi and many generals loyal to him, Chief of the General Staff Serhiy Shaptala[+], Ukrainian Foreign Ministry spokesman Oleh Nikolenko[+], spokesman for Ukraine’s Air Force Yurii Ihnat[+], Ukrainian National Security and Defense Secretary Oleksiy Danilov[+], deputy head of the Presidential Office Andrey Smirnov and Alexey Dneprov[+], his first assistant Serhiy Shefir (fellow Jew with whom he had co-founded his production company, Kvartal 95) and several other senior advisers and authorized representatives[+], the head of Ukrainian State Security Administration (UDO) Serhii Rud[+],Deputy PM and Infrastructure Minister Oleksandr Kubrakov[+], Agriculture Minister Mykola Solskyi[+], Commander of the Joint Forces of Ukraine's Armed Forces Lieutenant General Yuri Sodol[+], Air Force Commander Mykola Oleshchuk[+], Deputy head of Zelensky's office Rostislav Shurma, Chief of Staff of the Command of the Unmanned Systems Forces Roman Gladky, Commander of the ground forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Oleksandr Pavlyuk[+], Governors of Kyiv and Poltava regions Ruslan Kravchenko and Filip Pronin[+], Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Anatoliy Barhylevych[+]...
🔵 Zelensky regime persecutes and jails anyone who criticizes them or does anything against them, such as members of opposition and pro-Russian people (more than half of the country was always pro-Russian or anti-NATO or anti-EU, as all elections and polls prove), such as this 82-year-old man Yuri Chernishov[+] who got a life-sentence (15 years) on charges of high treason and collaborating with Russia. Just like Gonzalo Lira, this guy also exercised his right to free speech, whereby he openly criticized the fascist Kyiv regime in his literary and analytical publications, and since Kyiv could not arrest him for free speech, they invented (no evidence) that he was collaborating with Russia against Ukraine. And like Lira, knowing what awaits him, Chernishov jumped bail during his trial and attempted to flee but was apprehended on the Belarus border. MP Yevhen Shevchenko got jailed for calling on Zelensky to begin dialogue with Putin[+]. Many other critics of regime were arrested for their tweets “spreading fakes about the war in Ukraine” and face 5 to 8 years in prison, such as political analyst Dmytro Korniychuk[+][+], a blogger from Odessa Yevgeny Levchenko[+], a blogger-cosmetologist[+] from Kyiv, and many more.
🔵 Zelensky regime sanctions their critics, such as the former advisor to President, Oleksiy Arestovych[+], former President Petro Poroshenko[+], and 8.300[+] other Ukrainian citizens, despite the Constitution of Ukraine expressly prohibiting the use of sanctions against its own citizens!
➡ the persecution of independent reporters (e.g., Gonzalo Lira[+], Anatoly Shariy[+][+][+][+] – one of the country’s most popular journalists, Ruslan Kotsaba[+][+], Diana Panchenko[+][+][»], Nazarov and Korneichuk[+], Yuri Chernishov[+], Kirill Vyshinsky[»]), editors[+], and media companies[+] as well as members of the public and religious organizations who are objectionable to the Kyiv regime and as such classified as traitors and Russian collaborators. Democracy can only thrive when journalists work without fear or favor.
US-Chilean reporter Gonzalo Lira was arrested and tortured to death
sanctions against its own citizens, companies, television channels, other media outlets, and even members of parliament
anyone who criticizes the new regime, especially journalists, has been imprisoned, tortured, or assassinated
the list[+] of those kidnapped, tortured, and imprisoned by Ukraine’s security services since the outbreak of war grows by the day
➡ the persecution of peace activists (e.g., Yurii Sheliazhenko[+][+], a well-known Ukrainian peace activist, conscientious objector, pacifist, human rights defender and lawyer, Executive Secretary of the Ukrainian Pacifist Movement, has been placed under partial house arrest[+] by the Solomyanskyi District Court of Kyiv on 15 August 2023) – crackdown on peace activists and anti-war people reveals their growing intolerance for dissent. People are prosecuted and detained simply for peacefully expressing their genuine pacifist views, vocally opposing any escalation of the conflict, calling for a ceasefire and peace talks to end the war[+]
➡ no free speech – apart from politicians and journalists being persecuted and prosecuted in violation of their free speech rights, all other common people get the same treatment – here are just a couple of shocking examples:
An elderly woman who replied to a reporter that “Ukraine started the war in 2014” was arrested for saying that[»], even though even NATO chief said it[+][»]
Ukrainian fortune-teller/tarot cards reader was arrested during her live stream session[»] because she was doing a reading on Zelensky that was unfavorable to him – the cards showed that he was aggressive, irrational, too emotional, self-centered, his decisions bring harm to Ukraine, surrounds himself with greedy, power-hungry people like him. The actions of the so-called authorities are reminiscent of the Nazi Gestapo's in the 40s. (Disclaimer: not sure if this was staged)
➡ virtual elimination of independent media outlets and total state propaganda[+]
in February 2021, Zelensky closed down three TV channels[+][+] (the 112, NewsOne and ZIK news) and banned[+] the opposition media news sites such as Strana.ua as well as imposed sanctions on its editor-in-chief, Ihor Huzhva, without any legal basis. He broke his 2019 promise pledging[+] to “never, ever shut down any TV networks.”
suppressing press freedom and strict censorship – Zelensky ordered the drafting of a new law to boost media regulation in 2019. In December 2022, Zelensky signed[+][+] authoritarian law expanding government power to regulate media groups and journalists in the country
the authoritarian Ukrainian government enacted laws to crackdown on the freedom of expression – detaining bloggers who publish footage of bombing and false working of air defense – e.g., the SBU16 opened criminal proceedings against 6 bloggers[+] who face up to 8 years in prison. Who said it’s a free country?!
➡ no rule of law:
over the past years, international human rights monitoring organizations have recorded many facts of illegal detention, torture, intimidation, harsh treatment, and sexual violence, including forcing people to confess their guilt or cooperate. Such examples are regularly included in the reports of the United Nations Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU). In November 2021, the Human Rights Committee expressed concern over information about ongoing torture and harsh treatment by the Ukrainian security forces, while indicating that the number of cases of convictions for such violations is small.[+]
extrajudicial reprisals – illegal arrests and subsequent detention, torture, intimidation, and inhuman treatment, as reported since 2014 by UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU) and The US State Department Reports, such as in 2022 on Human Rights Practices in Ukraine[+]
The UN OHCHR found[+] in 2016 that “arbitrary detention, enforced disappearances, torture and ill-treatment of such conflict-related detainees were common practice of SBU… A former Kharkiv SBU officer explained, ‘For the SBU, the law virtually does not exist as everything that is illegal can be either classified or explained by referring to state necessity.”
Vasyl Maliuk, the head of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU), explained[»] how they intimidate judges to achieve prosecutions of certain people. They’re not even hiding it … that’s pure fascism in the open
the Ukraine regime runs[+] the Myrotvorets kill list[+][+][+] – the website was created[+] on the initiative of a former freelance advisor to the Minister of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, is run by the Ukrainian government[+] (secret services SBU[+], funded by the CIA and hosted by NATO). Human Rights Watch[+], The UN Committee on Human Rights[+], the EU Parliament[+]The Schiller Institute and the Executive Intelligence Review[+], and human rights activists of the Foundation to Battle Injustice[+] condemn it for violating numerous UN resolutions on human rights and the safety of journalists endangering the lives of hundreds of journalists and freedom of expression. As of September 2022 there were 327 children on the kill list[+]. Here is what they post on their homepage[+] flaunting the attrocities they have done to Russian POWs:
The caption: DEATH TO RUSSIAN-FASCIST INVADERS AND OCCUPIERS!
➡ violation of ethnic minorities rights[+][+] – the Kyiv government has drawn criticism from international organizations for its restrictions on the rights of ethnic minorities. Kyiv’s attitude and policy towards national minorities changed after the annexation of Crimea to Russia in 2014. Three years later, in 2017, the Ukrainian parliament adopted the Law on Education, which severely limited the existing rights of ethnic minorities to receive education in their native language. And in 2019, the law on the state language literally banned the use of historical minority languages in 30 spheres of public life. Since 2014, Kyiv regime has banned Russian culture[+], pro-Russian TV channels[+][+]and radio stations17[+], films[+], books[+], newspapers[+], social media[+], songs[+], plays and concerts[+], arts[+], 200 cultural figures[+][+] (actors, film directors, singers, ballet dancers, writers, etc.), pro-Russian political parties18, etc. They even banned Russian medicines[+], stopped paying pensions[+] to ethnic Russians, and many other human rights violations. In order to comply with the EU's accession criteria of protecting national minorities, the Ukrainian parliament adopted[+] a new Law on National Minorities[+], however, this new law does exactly the opposite: Kyiv strips from its ethnic minorities rights which they had previously enjoyed, thereby provoking conflicts and this war.
For instance[+], ethnic minorities such as Poles, are not warranted under the new legislation to freely use their ethnic-national symbols, even though they are fighting on the front lines, and Poland provides the biggest possible support to Ukraine. They are provided less time to air Polish-language media content and can barely use their mother tongue in schools or outside their homes, even though they were free to do so since the independence of Ukraine. Hungary opposes all EU measures[+][+] partly due to Ukraine's bad policy on minorities, including the Hungarian ethnic minority.
“First, second and third duty of democracy is freedom for all.” – Qamar Rafiq
➡ violation of human linguistic rights[+] – in 2019, Kyiv regime passed the law on the state language that banned the use of ethnic minority languages in 30 spheres of publiclife19, which was equally strongly condemned[+][+][+][+][+] by most of the ethnic minorities (Russia, Hungary, Greece, Romania, and Bulgaria), as well as European Parliament[+][+] and the Council of Europe Venice Commission[+][+], as well as all major human rights organizations, such as UN High Commissioner for Human Rights – OHCHR[+], Human Rights Watch[+], and OSCE[+], as the new restrictive laws violated international law, the Universal Declaration of Linguistic Rights[+], the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages[+], ratified by Ukraine in 2003, and Article 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights[+], and even the Ukraine’s Constitution and its Declaration of Independence, as well treaties with Russia. International law mandates the rights of ethnic, religious, and linguistic minorities to enjoy their own culture, profess their own religion, and use their own language[+].
➡ religious prosecution[+] – a total ban[+] on the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church – the persecution[+], prosecution[+][+][+][+][+], killing[»] of the clergy, and forced eviction of the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra[+] monastery's brethren, all of which are allowed by the West[+] “Ukraine, without any doubt or unnecessary modesty, is the leader of democratic transformations”[+][+]– Zelensky, the joker, at Summit for Democracy! While Zelensky is persecuting priests, he has not prosecuted a single neo-Nazi nor any commander or general who are committing crimes – unlike Russia with the rule of law[+][+] there.
➡ autocratic nature of the Ukrainian government is evident also in that every single Zelensky's proposal gets approved, which is because it is a one-party government, Zelensky's party (it has a majority in parliament and so it assures enough votes for all new policies and laws), which consists of his friends – they all got the job not because they are competent but because they fall in line with Zelensky's masters' agenda. In other words, just like in authoritarian regimes, everything that Zelensky or his American masters want to legalize gets legalized – from marijuana[+], pornography[+], and even organ trafficking[+][»] to banning opposition, independent media, Orthodox Church, Russian language, books, and TV channels[+][+].
All authoritarianism starts this way, like in Nazi Germany.
➡ cronyism20 is another evidence of Zelensky's autocratic regime – upon assuming the role as Head of State, Zelensky did not surround himself with experienced professional political and foreign policy advisors but rather hired the cast and crew of his media production company – actors, scriptwriters, cameramen, film editors, promotional people, and media technical advisors. A total of 12 people from Zelensky’s Kvartal 95 production studio were appointed to a variety of government posts[+][+]. Additionally[+], nearly 20 Zelensky friends received appointments into parliament, the President’s Office and central executive bodies or became members of supervisory boards and committees. Zelensky was ill-prepared for the role of a real President, which is why he should have appointed competent ministers and bureaucrats with relevant education and experience in these fields, yet he appointed his incompetent but loyal friends in all high offices[»]. Appointment of controversial officials: Zelensky faced criticism for appointing individuals with questionable backgrounds to key positions. For example, in September 2023, he appointed a former Ukrainian football player as his adviser[+][+] despite him not having any credentials or competencies for that job. Zelensky faced criticism for appointing many individuals[+][+][+] with questionable backgrounds to key positions.
➡ our shining “beacon of democracy” Zelensky canceled both the parliamentary[+] and presidential[+] elections (supposed to be held in October 2023 and April 2024) using martial law21[+] as an excuse, which was accepted because according to the Ukrainian Constitution (Articles 1922 and 8323), parliamentary and presidential elections should be held after the cancellation of martial law. Critics say, he and parliament (run by his party) opportunistically extended martial law to extend his party's grip on power. Zelensky has been under mounting pressure also from the West to at least pay lip service to democracy by holding elections. A number of EU politicians as well as US senators have made such arguments to Kyiv but to no avail. Zelensky’s aides were also suggesting[+] an election might be possible, with the speaker of the Ukrainian parliament suggesting that the laws could be amended because “democracy cannot stop.”
The proof that Zelensky is a dictator and Ukraine a dictatorship rather than democracy is the fact that there will also be no presidential elections in Ukraine in 2025 – as People's Deputy of Ukraine Zheleznyak said[+], “The draft of the 2025 state budget has nothing included regarding the possible holding of elections.”
Zelensky's backers argue that it is reasonable to suspend elections during wartime like the UK under Churchill did during World War II because the war created an environment where holding elections is logistically difficult and potentially divisive at a time when national unity is critical. However, the UK case can’t be compared[+] to Ukraine now because they differ significantly in context, legal mechanisms, and political dynamics. In the UK, it wasn’t an outright suspension of democracy but a pragmatic deferral, agreed upon by all major political parties in the coalition – the UK’s coalition diluted personal agency and the UK faced no external calls to hold elections at that time. While the justifications such as that an existential threat, occupied territory (about 20% of Ukraine), displaced millions (refugees and internally), and soldiers on the front lines make a fair election impractical, plus public support and “martial law” prove that Zelensky did not suspend elections “dictatorially”, he did abuse his power to take advantage of circumstances to cling to power like a dictator – he had the power to hold election during wartime, like many other wartime leaders who held elections, but he refused it despite many calls to prove Ukraine is indeed democracy. Zelensky’s unwillingness to hold elections stems from his legitimate fear that he would have lost miserably – according to all polls, he has zero chance of winning election. He could be easily beaten by any other contender, including neo-Nazi Bandera fan[ꚛ][+][+][+]General Valerii Zaluzhnyi. And while measuring Zelensky to the UK, how Churchillian or democratic is it to sanction your critics?! Such as the former advisor to President, Oleksiy Arestovych[+], former President Petro Poroshenko[+], and 8.300[+] other Ukrainian citizens, despite the Constitution of Ukraine expressly prohibiting the use of sanctions against its own citizens!
General Valerii Zaluzhnyi taking a selfie next to his hero Bandera, WWII Nazi collaborator Ukrainian nationalists who ordered massacres of civilians
In this context of martial law as the pretext for not holding the elections, there are several other crucial reasons to argue against Zelensky being a democratic leader and Ukraine being an alleged democratic country:
❌ Zelensky did not declare war [against Russia]. He also did not announce any military operation. He simply introduced martial law. Is introducing martial law without declaring war legit?
❌ If elections must be delayed due to martial law, constitutionally, this does not extend Zelensky's term as the president!!! They can extend the martial law but not the authority of a president whose mandate is up[»]. The Ukrainian constitution forbids parliamentary elections during a period of emergency but it does not spell out any rules for canceling presidential elections and extending a president’s term. Article 83 of Ukrainian Constitution says that under martial law the powers of parliament may be extended but no word about extending president's power, which means it cannot be extended. In that case, according to article 111 of Ukrainian Constitution, presidential powers should be transferred to the parliament, thus the Speaker of the Parliament Stefanchuk should be an acting President until new President can be elected. There is also a precedent for it, as this is already what happened in 2014, when under the circumstances of a revolution the powers of the president were transferred to the head of parliament (Verkhovna Rada). One of the authors (one of the members of the constitutional commission that drafted the charter) of the current Constitution, then-head of the Ukrainian presidential administration, Dmitry Tabachnik, said[+] that Zelensky cannot be considered the legitimate president of Ukraine after his term expired in May 2024. According to Article 103 of the Constitution and the explanation of the Constitutional Court, which clearly states that the terms of the president's powers are determined solely by the articles of the Constitution, he said that Zelensky is no longer the legitimate leader of Ukraine. Zelensky’s move to extend his own presidential term indefinitely seems to be in breach of Article 109 of Ukraine’s Criminal Code, which says that this should be treated as seizure of power.
One might ask why Zelensky had not requested that the Ukrainian Constitutional Court issues clarifications on the matter. The Constitutional Court of Ukraine[+] has the authority to assess whether legislative acts of the Parliament, President, and Cabinet are in line with the Constitution of Ukraine[+]. This court also gives commentaries to certain norms of the constitution or laws of Ukraine (superior acts of Parliament). This court should have made a ruling whether Zelensky is legitimate or not but they did not do it because Zelensky sabotaged the work of that court so that it could not make a ruling against him staying in power. By his decree of 29 December 2020, No. 607/2020 'On the dismissal of a judge of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine', from the moment of its adoption," Zelensky completely unconstitutionally recalled the chairman of the Constitutional Court, Oleksandr Tupytsky in March 2021. He had no right to do this. He has no such powers. Zelensky violated Ukraine’s Constitution, which states that Constitutional Court judges can only be fired by a vote of two-thirds of their colleagues and not by the President, which was aimed to ensure the Court’s independence. Of course, the Constitutional Court declared this presidential decree illegal and rejected it, which created a conflict between the court and the president. That is why Zelensky did not request the Constitutional Court to interpret the provisions of the Constitution and allow him to extend his powers. Zelensky’s repeated attempts to sack Tupytsky proved futile (because under Constitution, he has no power to fire judges) until the latter’s tenure expired on May 15, 2022. Since then no other Chairman was appointed to the post, which remains vacant and Tupytsky was forced to flee the country. As of 26 February 2025, he is still listed[+][+] as the Chairman but the Wikipedia says that this post is vacant[+][+] and that he left office in May 2022[+]. The question is why the Constitutional Court of Ukraine has no Chairman since May 2022?! Several more judges resigned in 2022, leaving the court with only thirteen and now only eleven[+] out of eighteen members – the number of judges now barely suffices to carry out normal court duties and elect the court’s chairperson. As such and without a Chairman, conveniently for Zelensky, it cannot proclaim him as illegitimate. Coincidently or not, on 15 May 2023, the Chairman of the Supreme Court Vsevolod Kniaziev was detained while allegedly receiving a bribe and put behind bars (charged[+] for alleged corruption) and then replaced by Stanislav Kravchenko. Clearly, there is something fishy going on in the High Courts of Ukraine.
❌ Judge Oleksandr Mykolayovych Tupytskyi[+], the last Head of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine (2019 to May 2022), proved in the High court of Ukraine that Zelensky exceeded his powers in order to usurp power. After that, the Judge was poisoned in Vienna and at the same time media campaign began against him in Ukraine, as reported[+] by one of the most popular Ukrainian journalists, once Journalist of the Year in Ukraine and Ukraine’s top 10 most influential women but now persecuted and in exile, Diana Panchenko[+][»].
❌ After pressure from the US to hold the election, Zelensky invalidated his excuse for canceling the elections by saying it is indeed possible but only if other countries pay for it. In other words, it would be not against the law to hold the election as long as the West gives him more money – he demanded 5 billion[»]. It was then time for the West to prove how much they really cared for democracy, whether they were willing to fund the Ukrainian election as much as they are willing to fund the Ukrainian military. Since they did not pay for the elections, it became evident that war has more value to NATO countries than democracy!
❌ Zelensky claimed that he would not hold elections (both parliamentary and presidential) because he needs all the money for the military, which is exposed as a lame excuse to stay in power by the fact that he allocates huge funds for purposes unrelated to the war all the time[+]. For instance, in August 2023, he replaced the Soviet symbols on the shield of the Motherland monument with the Ukrainian coat of arms[+][ꚛ]. The project costed over 756.000 dollars. At a time when there is no money in the budget to pay pensions and salaries to the military, as well as for elections, Kyiv was spending Western taxpayers' money for ideological purposes. Well, if they have money for that, then they should have it also for democracy.
❌ The West was pressuring Ukraine to hold the election, which is also telling how inappropriate was to cancel the election. ”Holding presidential and parliamentary elections in Ukraine, insisted on by Western partners, could lead to destabilization of the internal situation in the country” - the then-Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council OleksiyDanilov.
❌ Zelensky’s status in the eyes of the Russian government is based on Ukrainian constitution and therefore, he is considered an illegitimate president, “theringleader of the Kiev regime.” Putin suggested[+] that Ukraine’s Western backers were keeping Zelensky Zelensky in power as long as he is willing to lower the military draft eligibility age evermore to 18. This is needed to make up for the shortage of manpower[+][+][+][+][+][+][+][+]and to fight “to the last Ukrainian” for the Western interests. So, to please his masters for not holding elections and keeping him in power, in early-April 2024, he first lowered[+] the age from 27 to 25 just as the US emissary Graham requested[+] when he came to Kyiv just days before.
❌ Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) head ‘Tiny’ Kox objected to it pointing out: “Although democracy is far more than only elections, I think we all agree that without the elections, democracy cannot properly function.”
❌ There was a war there already since April 2014[+][»], so why didn't they declare martial law then? Why could they hold presidential elections in May 2014[+] and in March 2019[+] during wartime then and not now? At both times all pro-Russian candidates were prevented from campaigning and running for office (due to a major anti-Russian sentiment flared by the West during Euromaidan protests and Maidan Revolution in 2013-2014, new US-puppet anti-Russian regime, and the consequent Crimea's secession followed by annexation by Russia), which means that the elections were not democratic, free, or fair. Martial law was first declared in half of Ukraine by then-President Poroshenko in November 2018 for 30 days (from 26 November to 26 December 2018)[+]. The presidential election was held 3 months later – he lost and Zelensky won. Critics associated the timing with Poroshenko's pre-election political ambitions since his ratings fell very low[+]. History repeats itself, just with another President trying to use martial law to remain in power.
❌ To cling to power, it would be in the interest of Zelensky and his party (which has a majority in parliament) to keep the conflict with Russia going indefinitely so as to prolong martial law and so prevent elections. According to the Ukrainian political scientist Oleh Soskin[+], Zelensky illegally extends martial law in the country, due to which any elections in Ukraine, including presidential ones, are postponed, and thus he allows himself to remain in power indefinitely and continues to impose his dictatorship. “Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky faces civil war if he continues to illegally hold power in the country…” – Oleh Soskin, the advisor to the former president of Ukraine Leonid Kuchma (on YouTube[»]). Earlier, Soskin said that the decision announced on 26 July to extend martial law shows Zelensky's fear of losing the election.
❌ Syrian President Bashar al-Assad allowed elections in 2021[+] during the long war in Syria[+] (headed by some NATO states) and NATO states accused him of being an autocrat nonetheless but Zelensky who prevents elections by extending the state of emergency is deemed a “beacon of democracy” by Western leaders – what does that say about them and their definition of democracy?!
❌ The US has fought countless wars but never missed a single election. Even during its civil war when 600.000 Americans died. However, they still want us to believe that Ukraine is defending democracy and to support the country and its President who banned the opposition and sought to evade elections.
❌ Unlike Zelensky, Putin has not used martial law (in October 2022, he declared[»] martial law in all the regions[+] of former Ukraine that Russia annexed, just like Ukraine already declared it there and everywhere in February 2022) nor used any other cheeky means to avoid the 2024 presidential election[+], which proves that Putin is much more of a democratic leader than Zelensky. Also, Putin[+] had no fear of losing the election like Zelensky has – otherwise, he would hold the election. Russia's parliamentary elections are scheduled for September 2026. In an effort to dismiss the claims that Putin is more of a democratic leader than Zelensky, Zelensky backers attempted to invalidate the election results without providing any evidence to back up their allegations and instead by making jokes like: Vladimir Putin was just re-elected. He won 134% of the vote. Somehow Putin is allegedly[+][+][+][+][+][+][+][+][+][»][+] dying of terminal thyroid cancer, blood cancer, abdominal cancer, Parkinson's disease, leprosy, serious surgery complications, the aftereffects of a stroke, and dementia, as well as so unpopular that he is about to be killed[+][+][+] or deposed[+]any day now, surrounded only by foes, has five clones, is completely drugged out, but still somehow manages to control the elections in the largest country in the world all at the same time in these people’s minds.
congrats to Putin for beating cancer he never had, diagnosed by sources that never existed. Turns out the only thing dying was @DailyMail credibility😊
We wish Zelensky were a bit more precise about what he meant by “eventually” because from our perspective, Putin turns out to be the Bond hero in the sequel titled “Eventually Never Dies”😊
❌ “Who questions Zelensky’s legitimacy is an enemy of the state!” – Chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Ruslan Stefanchuk, said[»] after Zelensky's legal mandate expired in May 2024. You’ve got to love the open democratic discussion in Ukraine!
❌ Former Ukrainian Prime Minister Nikolay Azarov said[+][+] that Zelensky has lost his legitimacy and the West cannot rewrite the Ukrainian Constitution by holding summits and creating excuses for his brazen power grab.
❌ In February 2025, almost a year after Zelensky's term expired, Ukrainian Parliament declared Zelensky as the legitimate president of Ukraine but the members of Ukrainian broke the law by going against Constitution, which says that only the Ukrainian people and not only the members of parliament can chose who will be the president of Ukraine.However, the parliamentarians (consisting mainly of Zelensky party that has majority in parliament) took it upon themselves to decide whether Zelensky may stay or not as president. But this is not their sphere of responsibility; they have no legal power to decide who can be president or not! Their job is to make laws and not to make judgements like that – it is only the Constitutional Court that can judge that. The Constitutional Court is the highest power[+] in Ukraine’s government. No one in Ukraine holds more power than the judges of the Constitutional Court. The parliament, president or even law enforcement agencies have no oversight over the court’s judges. The court’s powers are enshrined in the constitution. Changing the constitution requires the consent of the Constitutional Court. But it is paralyzed and in crisis[+] because Zelensky’s clash with it, the Chairman is removed from his post in May 2022, fled the country and is not replaced by anyone.
➡ citing “credible intelligence”, the Federal Intelligence Service of Switzerland said[+] that Zelensky was “showing authoritarian traits”. The FIS accused Zelensky of attempting to “politically eliminate” Kyiv mayor Vitaly Klitschko ahead of next year’s presidential election.
➡ In December 2023[+] and January 2024[+], Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko, the former heavyweight boxing champion, threw a punch at Ukrainian President Zelensky by claiming the country is sliding into authoritarianism and criticized Zelensky’s policies as not democratic but having the “smell of authoritarianism,” singling out the “monopoly on information” as being bad for Ukrainian society. Klitschko told the Western media outlets that many Ukrainians don’t understand the situation on the battlefield, as the state media only talks about successes and ignores setbacks
➡ In January 2023, Zelensky announced[+] his revocation of the citizenship of four Ukrainian lawmakers suspected of treason, including three from a banned pro-Russian party, and signaled more bans were still to come. In what country does one man has the right to denounce citizenship to opposition politicians? Is this democracy or autocracy? These former Ukrainian members of parliament were forced to flee their country due to threats from Zelensky regime. One, Medvedchuk[+][ꚛ], was jailed but got free through a prisoner swap and fled to Russia.
➡ The Cato Institute, an American libertarian think tank, urged[+] the Biden administration in April 2022 to stop calling the Ukraine-Russia standoff a fight between democracy and authoritarianism, stressing that Ukraine is "at best… a corrupt, quasi‐democratic entity with troubling repressive policies", with the neo‐Nazi Azov Battalion being an integral part of the state's military and security apparatus.
➡ American politician and candidate for governor of Kentucky Geoffrey M. Young[+]: “There are still millions of Americans who believe we're defending freedom & democracy in Ukraine. We're not. We're defending the worst nazi government in the world. In fact, the US & NATO totally control the nazi "government" of Ukraine.”
➡ On the Senate floor, US Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) warned[»] about Ukraine being an autocracy listing much evidence.
➡ The Democratic Erosion Consortium published an article posted by University of Chicago on 5 February 2022: Autocratic Behavioral Warning Signs During Zelensky’s Presidential Rule in Ukraine[+]
➡ According to Zelensky’s horoscope and natal chart[+], he has a natural tendency to be domineering and authoritarian due to his Moon in Leo and in House 3, he seeks other people's attention and approval. His horoscope sign is Aquarius. According to numerology[+], Zelensky's Life Path is influenced by the number 6, which means that his thirst for balance prompts him to adopt inflexible, even tyrannical attitudes, which is the other side of the coin for his constant concern for equity and justice which is sometimes disappointed by the blunt reality.
Apart from evidence, also countless testimonials from Ukrainians clearly tell us that Ukraine is not a democracy, like this one[»] on French TV in 2022 in which a Ukrainian woman from Kyiv kept telling that to the prominent guests in the TV studio but they could not believe and could not even hear her or let her speak. They were so brainwashed about alleged Ukrainian democracy that they disputed the native as if they knew better than she did, taking just one argument of persecution of journalists as insufficient proof of failing democracy in Ukraine, not hearing and wanting to hear all the other evidence. Such testimonials are innumerable but many prejudiced people just do not want to hear them or have a look at all the evidence.
Just like the lawbreaker[+], plagiarist[+] gynecologist-turned-president of the EU Ursula von der Leyen[+] (nickname: von der Lying[+][+][+], a member of the board of trustees[+] of WEF), who had the nerve to declare[»] that “the war in Ukraine is about autocracy against democracy” although she herself was never democratically elected to become a President!
Joe Biden tweeted[+]: “We are engaged anew in a great battle for freedom. A battle between democracy and autocracy. Between liberty and repression.”
“The American people understand that defending democracy and liberty is never without cost,” President Biden said, regarding the US’ role in protecting Ukraine.
UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson, too, claimed[+] that “It is about Ukrainian democracy against Putin’s tyranny. It is about freedom versus oppression”.
Countless other NATO countries' authorities are following that script, including US House Speaker 'Nancy the Ripper' Pelosi[+], dilettante Germany’s Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock[+], etc. They contend that the war in Ukraine is part of a broader battle for democracy and against autocratic and illiberal values.
Statements from Western politicians, as well as pervasive reports in the mainstream media, have created an extremely misleading image of Ukraine (and Russia). There has been a concerted effort to portray the country not only as a victim of brutal Russian aggression but as a brave and noble bulwark of freedom and democracy. The promoters of that narrative contend that the ongoing war is not just a quarrel between Russia and Ukraine over Kyiv’s ambitions to join NATO and their territorial dispute. The established narrative would have us believe that Ukraine is a flawless, democratic Eastern European antithesis to Putin's regime, when in fact it is much worse.
When it comes to the democracy against autocracy narrative, it must be said that this claim cannot be further from the truth because there is no democracy in Ukraine, which is verified by renowned Western sources[+][+][+][+][+][+]that show that Ukraine is an autocracy, not a democracy, but NATO leaders are selling Ukraine as a democracy and Ukrainians as fighting for democracy, which is to say, they are deliberately deceiving their employee, the public. According to leading analysts of global democracy, Ukraine’s government does not measure up as a democracy.
The Economist Intelligence Unit, in its 2021 Democracy Index[+], assessing nations' democratic status by measuring electoral process, pluralism, political culture political participation, government functioning, and civil liberties, doesn’t consider Ukraine as a democracy. That same report ranked the US as a "flawed democracy."
Similarly, the nonpartisan think tank Freedom House gave Ukraine a democracy percentage of 39.2 percent in its 2021 Nations in Transit report[+].
In other words, as an autocracy or flawed democracy even before the Russians rolled their troops into Ukraine, Ukraine is certainly not suitable to defend democracy or fight for Europe's democracy. It is all just propaganda to gain support from democratic countries.
All things considered, Ukraine and the West24 need to leave behind this narrative, just as renowned experts are pleading.[+][+][+][+][+][+]
Ukraine is a certified electoral autocracy[+] (a.k.a. hybrid regime[+][+]) – the Ukrainian government is the US-puppet regime that was installed by false campaign promises25[»][+][»] as well as manipulating both the election process and the minds of voters. We provide the evidence[*] on how the US undemocratically enacted a regime change in 2014 and we give more evidence26 about the undemocratic electoral fraud in Ukraine's 2014 presidential election as well as evidence27 for how could a 41-year-young guy (Zelensky), who was nothing but a self-admitted[»][»][+] “proud clown”[»][»][»][»] just months before being elected in 2019 and had no training or experience in politics, diplomacy, or leadership whatsoever, possibly be elected as President and what's more with incredible 73% of the vote[+]! Just take a step back for a minute to think about how on Earth something like that could ever be possible.
Like Trump, who was the US President at that time, too, and a former reality show champion, Zelensky used the momentum of a popular sitcom to not just kick-start a political career but run for the highest office despite having absolutely no competence or qualifications for it. He was an outsider who would clean up Kyiv. And why not? His TV show was so popular; his political party took on the name.
Not only there was a Hollywood-style four-year-long presidential campaign in the form of a comedy series (‘The Servant of the People’[+] with Zelensky acting as a President and successfully solving all Ukrainian problems) and presented like a reality show[»] combined with mass mind-controlling psyop along with false campaign promises[»][+][»] at play but there was alleged electoral fraud and major opposition leaders were prevented to run for office. What is more, many people voted for Zelensky as a vote against then-President Poroshenko who was much hated, so most people would vote for anyone only not to let Poroshenko remain as president[+]. In other words, by voting for newcomer Zelensky and his newly-formed party, most people did not vote for him but against the government that was installed by the Maidan revolution – Zelensky was not part of it and so he got all the anti-Maidan votes[+]. Identifying as a populist, he positioned himself as an anti-establishment, anti-corruption figure. He won thanks to a strong anti-establishment sentiment and on the promise to break the system, just like a fictional president whom he played in his TV comedy show. Zelensky even named his political party after that sitcom – "The Servant of the People" Party, which certainly can be renamed "Servant of the USA". And he himself admitted[»], Ukrainians did not vote for Zelensky but for a fiction character Vasiliy Goloborodko, whom Zelensky played in that sitcom. He fooled them right.
For a comedian whose most salient pitch to voters was not being Poroshenko, Zelensky has done absolutely nothing different than his opponent. As a matter of fact, he intensified all Poroshenko's policies.
a scene from a sitcom in which Zelensky played a common guy who suddenly became president of the country. Here’s how he dreamt of dealing with problems. The problem is, he never get out of character from that role he enjoyed playing, a problem many actors face who get stuck in a character (have difficulty shaking off a role that they enjoyed playing), which encroaches on other facets of their life, disrupting the actor's psyche.
Understandably, people voted for him just to get rid of Poroshenko and the likes of him (other presidential candidates) but it is curious why Ukraine has no one else worthy enough to be a hero or a role model, which is why they deem people like victims of sniper attacks and a convicted criminal, Nazi collaborator, loser Stepan Bandera28[+][+], as “national heroes”.
There were also other presidential candidates but Zelensky was a perfect candidate to play the role of the US puppet because he had three main assets – Jewish heritage, liberal globalist mindset, and acting skills (preferable for US puppets), and he was not hated by the people as almost all other politicians who had proven to be corrupt. The actors are good puppets. So, the US made sure that this showman won the presidency by all means. Another reason why American neocon globalists backed Zelensky to become the President may be the fact that he is alleged participant[+][+][+][+][+][+][+] of the Young Global Leaders program[+][+] of the World Economic Forum (WEF) – a five-year program of indoctrination into WEFs principles and goals, which is affirmed with him sharing their worldview and being with his insignificant wife[+] their keynote speaker[»][+]. The one thing the globalists fear is a populist uprising, which is why, like a wolf in sheep's clothing, they “dress” their chosen guys, like Zelensky, as populists to let them lead their “sheep” into submission rather than revolt. It may be too late to do anything about it when the populace realizes that they voted for a different kind of populist[+].
Zelensky was convincing in his role as a liberal democrat populist President in the TV series The Servant of the People[+][»]: a common man fighting against corruption and discrimination against Russians. This was broadcast on the TV channel owned by Ukrainian the Jewish oligarch Ihor Kolomoisky, who was later the main sponsor of Zelensky’s presidential campaign as well as of neo-Nazi paramilitaries. Four years of acting as a fictional president surely helped Zelensky with his fast transformation into his role as a real president. Kolomoisky[+] and Americans helped him blur the line between fiction and reality.
The US (or NATO) was keen to get a Jew to become the President of Ukraine to convince the public that all the talk about neo-Nazis in Ukraine is nothing but Russian propaganda. Since the Western intelligence officers knew very well about this issue of Ukraine being the world's biggest hub for neo-Nazis and that the West has been funding these neo-Nazis since 2013 or earlier (to stage anti-government protests and revolution, and then to kill Russians first in Donbas then elsewhere), NATO heads knew very well that Russia would use it against Ukraine and NATO in their informational warfare. Therefore, to counter it, Western leaders came up with a perfect plan to help a Jew win the presidential election. So, the West installed29 a Jewish President mainly30 for that reason – to use it as an argument against all allegations about the rampant neo-Nazi movement in Ukraine and to discredit Russian denazification efforts. How else a comedian with no education and experience in politics, diplomacy, or leadership could become a president?
The Washington Post wrote:[+] “actor and comedian Volodymyr Zelensky’s top credential when he was elected in 2019 was that he’d played a president on TV”.
Then there are reports[+][+][+][+] including from the Daily Beast and the Nation[+] in 2019 revealing that Zelensky's sponsor's neo-Nazi militants – Biletsky’s31 National Druzhina (engl. Squad, the street wing of the Azov movement) monitored the polls in the 2019 presidential election, intimidating the voters and in a position to rig the election on the polling stations staffed by their fighters[+]. Like their sponsor Kolomoisky, they were against[+] the current President Poroshenko who was Zelensky's rival in the election. Since 2014, Jewish oligarch Kolomoisky has been funding and funding not just comedian Zelensky but also Ukraine's notorious neo-Nazi and ultra-nationalist battalions, including Azov, Aidar, Donbas, Dnepr 1, and Dnepr 2, according to Newsweek[+]. As the Daily Beast[+] and the Guardian[+] reported, Biletsky’s National Druzhina (consisting of former members of neo-Nazi organizations) were storming a municipal council intimidating and threatening lawmakers as well as civilians so as to “restore order” according to their fascist “justice”. Just a look at them marching through streets like this[»] is reminiscent of Hitler's Germany.
American psyop methods[+][+] (CIA’s influence on public opinion[+] and the US military perception management program[+] to induce or reinforce attitudes and behaviors) that we mentioned earlier were used, of course, but what is staggering is the extent to which these methods are effective – understandably, it is possible to influence the public to vote for a long-time opposition leader with a fair amount of experience in politics but to be able to get them to vote overwhelmingly (73%) for a self-proclaimed[»][»][+] clown[»][»][»] as a president and also for a boxer as a mayor of the nation's capital (not known for their intelligence, diplomacy, leadership, or economy expertise needed for the job) with no previous experience or education in politics, that is absolutely staggering. It either says a lot about American ingenuity or Ukrainian lack of intelligence (Zelensky’s former adviser and spokesperson Oleksiy Arestovych, dubbed as “nation’s psychotherapist” was suggesting the latter[+][»]). It seems, they fell for false campaign promises[»][+][»] (with Americans helping Zelensky figure out what the voters want and then blatantly promise them, without meaning to do it), American mind control psyop methods, and hope that he, as one of them, would be better than Poroshenko and all other corrupt politicians who disappointed them.
Zelensky was elected to end the war but he made a “U-Turn” and rather escalated it, breaking his promises[»][+]. When he ran for president in 2019, Zelensky promised to stop the corruption and war in Donbas[+][+][+], as well as to reconcile the country (pro-West and pro-Russian populace) but he spat in the face of his voters who wanted peace by doing the opposite with escalating the conflict into a full-scale war with Russia, and he never stopped corruption either (quite the opposite[+][+][+][+][+][+]).
Zelensky was reportedly[+] failing in Ukraine, which reflected in his ratings dropping very soon after being elected – his approval rate was extremely low in 2020 and 2021, with a large majority of people disapproving of his actions – just 12% people liked him and another 26% somewhat approved his actions, according to Statista[+].In 2022, his ratings soared due to NATO propaganda that praised him, although he did nothing special other than begged for support and aid.
Forbes wrote[+] in 2021, “Life has become art. But for many Ukraine watchers and foreign investors – they want their money back. This Servant of the People real-life movie version is not like the TV series. This is a flop.”
“I am a clown, and I am very proud of it!” – Zelensky[»][»][+]
Elect a clown. Expect a circus.
“When a Clown moves into a Palace, he doesn't become a King. The Palace instead becomes a Circus.” – Turkish proverb
“Don't blame a clown for acting like a clown. Ask yourself why you keep going to the circus.”
“Can the blind lead the blind? Will they not both fall into a pit? – Jesus, Bible, Luke 6:39[+]
Every man and woman should know their place. It is not clown’s place to run a country. You can take a clown out of the circus but not the circus out of the clown. A man's ambition should not exceed his worth; Zelensky's not about changing the Ukraine; he's about changing your perception of Ukraine. As a former clown and a showbiz guy who had no prior experience in politics, diplomacy, or leadership, it's impossible to take him seriously.
When asked in Quora[+] about Zelensky, Ukrainians described him as extremely disrespectful towards everyone[+], immature and incompetent[+], unrealistic and corrupt[+], traitor[+], just an average TV showman[+], he was hated by the biggest part of the population for his lies[+]. But when Russia launched its SMO and the West stood with Ukraine, Zelensky's ratings soared because naïve Ukrainians believed that it was all his doing, obviously not aware that this was NATO's proxy war[*][+] against Russia using Zelensky as pawn and Ukrainians as mere cannon fodder. Although it took a while, with time, more and more Ukrainians are finding out about that as well as Zelensky's corruption[+], how he is pocketing[+][+] and embezzling[+][+][+][+] foreign aid instead of using it as intended.
“You can’t say it enough, Ukraine is not a democracy. … In American terms, you would call Ukraine a tyranny… So, having banned all opposition[+], he then seized control of the country's media outlets. Zelensky signed a decree that combines all national television channels into a single platform that he controls.”
– Fox News host Tucker Carlson, on his show, 22 February 2023.
Ukraine's democracy is a travesty – the mere fact that (under the US and EU patronage) for many years even before the war, Ukraine has been the most corrupt[+]and the poorest country in Europe[+][+] that issued laws against ethnic minorities[+], it could indicate to intelligent people that there is something wrong with that country and its government that has no democracy[+]. But if democracy is where they are screwing over the minorities in the name of the simple majority, then this is Ukraine.
“As President, I’ll refuse to be bullied by an anti-democratic comedian-turned-leader & it’s truly mystifying to me that the rest of the West is eating out of this Pied Piper’s hand every day.” – US Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy[+]
Moreover, evidence for the Kyiv regime being authoritarian is in all the laws and legislations enacting an absolute monopoly on power, extrajudicial reprisals, strict censorship[+][+], the virtual elimination of independent media outlets[+][+], persecution[+][+][+] of journalists, clergy[+], and all of who oppose the Kyiv regime narrative, as well as the eradication of the political opposition[+][+]. The shift into autocracy begins with a leader’s decision to repress their opposition. The current regime, adopting the ideology and practices of Ukrainian national radicals, has essentially morphed into a neo-Nazi or fascist dictatorship[*]. This is the regime that the EU and the US are supporting and providing with weapons to kill anyone, including civilians, and to conduct terrorist attacks in Russia.
All that Putin was condemned for doing by the West, we saw Zelensky do to the nth degree in a manner of a totalitarian regime – exceedingly prosecuting opposition, journalists, activists, and protesters. Every single thing that Putin was accused of, Zelensky does it all the time at a much higher volume – shutting down all independent media, banning opposition parties[+][+], banning the Orthodox church, kidnapping[»][»][»][»][»][ꚛ][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»][»] hundreds of thousands of civilians to force them to fight for him, torturing citizens to death for contradicting the Kyiv narrative, persecuting the bloggers for posting videos of real events[+] (as opposed to Kyiv's narrative), no freedom of speech[»], corruption[+][+] in overdrive with evidence of Zelensky being corrupt[+][+][+][+] and surrounding himself with corrupt people[+][+][+] as well as not carrying out his pledge to fight corruption[+], etc. – and still, NATO states support Zelensky regime giving him weapons and billions of money. What does that say about the US, UK, and EU?
NATO officials’ claim that the war was triggered by Russia breaking into the “Garden of Eden” of Western democracy is a misrepresentation invoking a global struggle for “democracy” against “authoritarianism”[+]. The framing of the war in the West as a battle between democracy and authoritarianism or even tyranny[+] or dictatorship[+][+] is just a trickery to raise the stakes of the war and to generate political, financial, military, and moral support for Ukraine from people in the West. The whole terminology of “defending democracy” is being stretched extremely wide and applied to any policy in some manner related to Western nations defending their own interests.
However, such a depiction of this war as democracy vs authoritarianism is highly counter-productive and beneficial to Russia because it alienated non-democracies and prevented them from solidarizing with Ukraine and its democratic allies. Autocracies such as China, Saudi Arabia, India, and Iran, for instance, are surely not going to support the alleged democracy of Ukraine for that matter[+]. The thing is, only about half of the world’s countries are now democracies (democracy started to spread only after WWII). But when it comes to the number of people, 71% of the world's population do not live in democratic countries[+], mostly in Asia and Africa. So, they are surely reluctant to support such a cause of alleged saving democracy.
Both Russia and Ukraine are considered electoral autocracies[+] – the most prevalent type of political regime in the world with over 5,6 billion people living in such regimes.
Many European diplomats have been hesitant on the democracy-versus-autocracy framing but only for the pragmatic reason of not confronting a bloc of countries that oppose democratic systems. While the democracy-autocracy divide is set to become more consequential, NATO officials are exposing the insincerity of their backing of the supposed Ukrainian fight for democracy as well as their double-dealing by seeking deeper cooperation with authoritarian regimes to help counter Russia. If this war is supposed to be democracy-versus-autocracy how insane are NATO officials in soliciting autocratic governments to support an alleged democracy of Ukraine?! The United States and some European states have been reaching out to Gulf states to replace Russian gas and softening their positions toward oil-exporting Venezuela. The United States used up considerable political capital trying to get the Gulf states to condemn Russia at the United Nations. US Secretary of State Antony Blinken traveled to the Middle East to press the region’s authoritarian states into action against Russia.
The reality is, Ukraine's regime is an electoral autocracy and Ukrainians are NOT fighting for freedom and democracy, especially not for Europe's. No, Ukraine has not set out to protect Western civilization as it, in fact, ruined it trying to push its fascist agenda[*]. This will become more evident with more facts provided throughout this peace initiative. Their packaging of this war is just propaganda to get more financial, military, and humanitarian aid.
Thank you for reading this article and participating in this peace initiative by raising your awareness and, hopefully, your consciousness and spirit. To properly grasp everything, we[*]recommend reading the articles of this peace initiative for Ukraine in the proper order, which is listed in the Contents. So if you haven’t read the previous articles, we recommend that you do. This article is part of the “Reality Checks” segment. When you are ready, please proceed to the next article in this series: Is Ukraine A Fascist And Terrorist State?
Thanks for reading Peace Initiative! Subscribe for free to receive new posts by email and support our work.
we refer to Kyiv as a regime[+] due to its oppressive and repressive policies, corruption, and foul treatment of its ethnic minorities, such as the ethnic Russians, violating their human rights, tyrannizing, and killing them since 2014.
Estonia ratified the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (FCNM) in 1998, committing to protect minority language, culture, and political participation but the non-citizen status and language-based citizenship tests are violating Article 4 (non-discrimination) and Article 15 (effective participation in public life) by disproportionately excluding Russian-speakers from political rights. The 2025 local voting ban further breaches Article 15, as it removes existing rights without clear justification beyond alleged security concerns – because “security” is the magic word that makes democracy disappear faster than a rabbit in a hat😊. Education reforms aiming for all-Estonian schooling by 2024 violate Article 14 (minority language education)[+][+] – because who needs cultural diversity when you can enforce a one-size-fits-all curriculum😊?
Under legal definitions (ICERD, ECHR), racism isn’t limited to race; it includes ethnic/national origin. Baltic policies targeting Russian-speakers based on their ethnic/national origin – non-citizen status, voting bans, media and education restrictions – are a form of racism under International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD, 1965) broad definition, as they discriminate based on ethnic origin, impairing political and cultural rights. Sociologically, they’re ethnic discrimination with systemic racist elements, though not race-based, as Russians and Estonians/Latvians are racially similar.
Under ICERD’s definition, this effect of excluding an ethnic group from political rights qualifies as racial discrimination, even if the intent was national sovereignty, not ethnic hatred. Media bans also qualify as racism under ICERD’s broad definition due to their effect on Russian ethnic identity, restricting cultural rights.
The high non-citizen rates (19% in Estonia, 29% in Latvia in 1992) and persistent barriers to naturalization (e.g., language tests, which many older Russians fail) create a structural underclass, aligning with sociological views of racism as systemic oppression.
Estonia's and Latvia's governments deny racism, of course, framing policies as legal restoration of pre-Soviet statehood. Yet, the policies’ longevity (30+ years) and escalation (2025 voting ban in Estonia and 2025 education ban in Latvia) suggest intent to marginalize Russians, especially post-Ukraine war, where security concerns are used to justify collective punishment. Russia condemns this as “apartheid,” and FUEN’s 2018–2022 resolutions confirm discriminatory effects.
Media bans restrict Russian-speakers’ access to culturally relevant media and education, affecting their cultural identity and expression. The bans target Russian language/culture, a marker of ethnic identity, disproportionately affecting Russian minorities. ICERD’s inclusion of “descent” and “ethnic origin” implies this is racial discrimination as it impairs cultural rights (e.g., FCNM Article 9, access to media).
The 2025 education ban in Latvia, erasing Russian-language schooling, risks cultural assimilation, which FUEN calls a violation of minority rights. Blanket bans (e.g., Latvia’s non-state channel ban) and education restrictions affect all Russian-speakers, creating a discriminatory effect, even if not the primary intent. ECHR Article 10 (freedom of expression) violations indicate overreach.
Plutocracy is a form of government in which the supreme power is lodged in the hands of the wealthy classes; government by the rich. A political system governed by the wealthy people. Also, a controlling or influential class of rich men and women, whose power derives from their wealth.
many European leaders came to power through a scheme and not by the will of people — here are just a few examples but there are many more:
France[+][+] - Gabriel Attal became a PM in June 2024 despite losing it to a populist coalition and with only 24.5% of the votes. After him Michel Barnier was also appointed by Macron rather than elected in September 2024
Spain[+] - Pedro Sánchez remained a PM despite losing it to Feijóo and with only 31.7% of the votes
Poland[+] - Donald Tusk became a PM despite losing it to Morawiecki and with only 30.7% of the votes
Netherlands[+] - Dick Schoof became a PM despite no one voted for him and Geert Wilders winning the election
Bulgaria[+] - Nikolai Denkov remained a PM (came to power through a coalition) after all 3 attempts to form a government following the June 2024 elections failed and despite no one voting for him and him submitting the resignation in March 2024
WEF[+] — World Economic Forum founded by Klaus Schwab is a billionaire club of far-left, globalist oligarchs with huge influence on world governments and UN; meets once a year in Swiss Davos. Agenda: the Great Reset, NWO, one world government, depopulation, CBDC...
WEF is just a proxy serving the interest of the globalist Jesuits (HQ Rome, near Vatican) via Jesuit-run CIA, as we explain in the article "Behind-The-Scenes Powerbrokers"[*]
One of Von der Leyen lies[+]: "the Russian economy, the industry is in tatters" but it turned out to be a lie as the Russian economy keeps growing while the EU economy and industry are in tatters
WEF has infiltrated in many governments and the UN[+][+] — One of the UN projects to achieve WEF Great Reset Agenda is The 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Obscured by noble-sounding verbiage, hides a hideous truth - they want to take away our goods, such as electrical appliances, cars and even property rights
Anglo-Saxons[+] are originally pagan Germanic people who migrated from northern Europe and settled first in England and then also in the US (British royal familiy the Windsors are Germans)
Navalny never posed any threat to Putin as he was very unpopular in Russia – with his party, he had only around 2% liberal pro-West supporters who oppose Russian traditions and conservative values and as traitors team up with Russian enemies
radio stations[+] were not banned but as part of forced Ukrainization, since 2016, all radio stations, including those in Russian language, were forced to have 60% of programmes such as news and analysis and min. 35% songs in Ukrainian language
Since 2014 Maidan revolution, when a new US-propped anti-Russian regime came to power by force, 23 political parties have been banned in Ukraine, which clearly shows that there is no democracy there. In 2014-2015, Party of Regions and 3 communist parties[+] (the Communist Party of Ukraine, the Communist Party of Ukraine's Workers and Peasants, and the Reformed Communist Party of Ukraine) were effectively banned. Party of Regions[+] won the previous parliamentary election[+], so it was the most popular party at that time but the new Kyiv regime prevented it from running in new snap 2014 election by destroying it. The Communist Party (KPU) had been an important force in Ukrainian politics, polling 13 percent in the 2012 parliamentary elections[+]. Since March 2022, Zelensky regime banned 19 more political parties[+]!
Kyiv regime banned the use of Russian language in 30 spheres of public life – public administration, electoral process, referendums, courts, schools/education, science, theatres and other culture, media, economic and social life, health and care institutions, activities of political parties etc.; Ukrainian mandatory for civil servants, soldiers, doctors, and teachers – all of which is violation of human rights as well as the Article 12 of the Friendship, Cooperation and Partnership Treaty with Russia[?+ENpg.33].
The restrictive policies started since 2014 and culminated in 2019 with the language law that prohibits employees of restaurants, cafes, bars, shops, banks, hospitals and other similar institutions from talking to visitors in Russian language[+], the citizen can no longer contact or send letters to the officials and authorities of higher levels in Russian language; identity documents can no longer be issued in Russian language...
In a country in which 30%[+] of people – 14,3 million people declared Russian as their native language in the last national census; 8,3 million[+] of them identified as ethnic Russians, if your native language is Russian and you don’t speak Ukrainian, would you protest the regime that passes such laws? And if you protest it but you are called a “terrorist” because you protest it and government sends the National Guard packed with neo-Nazis to kill or terrorize you and all your family, friends, and neighbors, would you like to separate from that regime, or not?
Although 30%[+] of Ukrainians declared Russian as their native language in the last national census, even more or most of them – 50% of Ukrainian social media users posted in Russian language (46% in Ukrainian and 4% in English), as data collected[+] on Instagram showed in January 2022.
cronyism[+] is the spoiled system practice of partiality in awarding jobs and other advantages to friends or trusted colleagues, especially in politics and between politicians and supportive organizations — as opposed to awarding jobs based on merit or competence
Article 19 of the Law “On the Legal Regime of Martial Law”[+]: "In the conditions of martial law, the following are prohibited... conducting elections of the President of Ukraine"
Ukrainian Constitution (Article 83)[+]: "If the term of powers of the Verkhovna Rada expires while martial law is in effect, its powers shall be extended until the day of the first meeting of the first session of the Verkhovna Rada elected after the cancellation of martial law"
false campaign promises — Zelensky promised he would end corruption and war in Donbas, negotiate peace with Russia, as well as reconcile the country (pro-West and pro-Russian populace) but instead he did the opposite
the snap 2014 presidential election should have been invalidated by the UN for at least five main reasons:
1. Voter turnout was below the legal threshold, as according to Ukrainian law[+], a snap election must have a voter turnout higher than 50%, which was not the case – the total number of eligible voters was around 35.5 million but only around 18 million people cast a ballot, which was less than 50%. Mark Twain once famously said that there are three types of lies: “lies, damned lies, and statistics.” The Ukrainian authorities falsely and unlawfully presented voter turnout as 60% because they excluded the regions that were “not under government control” (Donbas and Crimea) although they claimed those regions as Ukraine. In the 2014 parliamentary elections, the official voter turnout (excluded some regions) was even lower, 52.42% – unlawfully deducting the eligible voters in areas where voting was not made possible. Calculating the turnout in such a manner was unlawful because no electoral regulation ratifies the exclusion of any region or eligible constituency under any circumstances! Government has a duty to ensure everyone the possibility to vote but the interim government of the time failed (and didn’t care) to do so for over 5,5 million eligible voters, who were discounted (certainly for the reason that they were sure to vote for pro-Russian candidates), which invalidates the legitimacy of those elections that should have been postponed until the possibility to vote was granted equally to everyone. Even by discounting millions of voters, the alleged turnout of 60% was much lower than the average voter turnout of 72% in previous presidential elections, so such a low turnout suggests some foul play in which many people obviously didn't want to participate – many people questioned the validity of the election. What is more, there is a dispute about what constitutes “not under government control” anyway because, at that time, there was no legitimate government, as the opposition undemocratically and unconstitutionally forced itself into the government position. Therefore, it could be argued that Donbas was indeed under democraticallyelected government control and all other regions were not. Furthermore, Ukraine continues to claim Crimea as an integral part of its territory but it has denied its people the possibility to vote in all elections – how can that be lawful? In summary, to our knowledge, regarding voter turnout count, no law allows disenfranchising or discounting or excluding any region or eligible constituency under any circumstances, therefore any such act is unlawful and so, by law, the voter turnout was then lower than 50%, which was below the legal threshold and therefore snap 2014 presidential election should have been invalidated. The US and EU were pleased with the election results because it suited their agenda, thus they and their allies quickly praised the election endorsing the vote. Draw your own conclusions about it.
2. Morally unacceptable electorate manipulations took place, such as administrative tricks to get more votes for a particular party, disenfranchisement, voter intimidation, disinformation, corruption, banning assault, harassment, and libel, as the election was restricted – it was not held everywhere in Ukraine – most ballot stations in regions with Russian ethnic minorities were not open for polling, as they legally should have been. Russian ethnic minority voters, that is, pro-Russian voters were hindered to vote. For instance, in the pro-Russian Donbas region, only 426 ballot stations were open for polling instead of all 2.430, disabling 80% of the Russophone Donbas population to cast a vote – this alone should have questioned the legitimacy of the elections.
3. Pro-Russian candidates were hindered to run for office – as opposed to all previous elections, there were no well-known pro-Russian candidates in the elections as the established Russian ethnic minority leaders were forced into exile or arrested on charges of leading a separatist movement (and after the elections cleared of charges in the absence of proof, which is telling of the political motive behind the arrestment). Ukraine's Pro-Russian candidate quit the presidential race[+]because it was too "dangerous" for him to continue his presidential campaign, as he was beaten by pro-Ukrainian activists in Kyiv. What kind of laws and constitution allows an ethnicity with millions of people to be unrepresented in the elections?
4. No equal chances for all parties – the pro-Russian Party of Regions was hindered to run presidential campaigns in many regions – it was the biggest party in Ukraine between 2006 and 2014. providing several Ukrainian Presidents and Prime Ministers but ahead of the 2014 elections, the party's symbol and activities were banned in many regions governed by ultra-nationalists, thus they were illegally prevented to campaign in those regions.
5. Corrupt election observation with biased international observers[+] – Ukraine only sent election monitoring invitations to the pro-EU monitoring organizations and not to the pro-Russian CIS Election Monitoring Organization. This was not only unfair but also intentional in order to cover up all the irregularities surrounding the elections. See also Election fraud in the 2014 Parliamentary Elections[+]
The Western community disregarded these issues of constitutionality and legitimacy of the 2014 election as well as its procedural irregularities because the results suited them, as a pro-EU government was then instituted.
It is most curious why and how Ukrainians elected no one better than Zelensky to be their president – a 41-year-young guy who was nothing but a vulgar[»] self-proclaimed[»][»][+] clown[»][»][»] just months before being elected in 2019. A guy who made his living by playing piano with his genitals[»][»][»], dancing shaking his bootie in high heels[»], and running naked in public spaces[»][ꚛ][+][ꚛ]. It makes us wonder how on Earth could Ukrainians choose a showman with no political and leadership education or experience to be their national and war leader and with a suspiciously high 73% of the vote[+].
Obviously, there is more than one reason but a majority voted for him because he was a Russian-speaking anti-war, pro-peace candidate, who promised to make peace with Russia. There was a war there since 2014 and most people wanted it to end, which he vowed to do but then went back on his word. How he convinced people is a psyop matter and most people voted for Zelensky only to vote against the then-President Poroshenko so as not to let him stay the president[+]. By voting for a newcomer most people did not vote for him but against the government of the Maidan revolution[+].
Stepan Bandera[+][+] was convicted murderer and an anti-Semite Nazi collaborator in WWII, responsible for the ethnic cleansing of ethnic minorities and the genocide of more than 100.000 of Poles, Soviets, and Jews whom now Ukraine hails as hero
West installed a Jewish President — US-led NATO countries governments indirectly (through NGOs and US-based Jewish Ukrainian oligarch Kolomoyskyi) backed, funded, and endorsed Zelensky's presidential campaign
other major reason to have a Jew in power was to easily get him to sell Ukraine to Jewish-owned American businesses such as BlackRock, JPMorgan Chace, etc. This plan also worked as Zelensky handed the Jews from BlackRock and JPMorgan Chase a $400 billion contract[+] to rebuild Ukraine; they own[+][+][+][+] Ukraine anyway as they have grabbed much more Ukrainian land and natural resources than Russia has, after Zelensky approved a Land Reform allowing foreigners to buy land in Ukraine. The American Jews seized Ukraine by means of manipulation and exploiting Ukrainian corruption with bribing or blackmailing corrupt Ukrainian leaders or by installing their puppets into leadership positions – how else do you think that dilettante Zelensky came to power (with the help of Jewish Ukrainian oligarch living in the US, Kolomoisky)?! American Jews bought[+][+] Ukraine at a discount price and in a destroy-rebuild scheme[+] will earn even more if Russia allows it.
American Jewish asset management firm BlackRock is the richest company in the world -it is one of the top shareholders in all major U.S. banks, including JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and Wells Fargo. It is also a top shareholder of Walmart, General Electric, General Motors, Ford, AT&T, Verizon, Google, Apple, Exxon Mobil and Chevron. BlackRock’s other large holdings include Microsoft, Johnson & Johnson, Amazon, Facebook, Berkshire Hathaway, Gilead Sciences, Pfizer, Procter & Gamble, Merck, Intel, Coca-Cola, Walt Disney Company, Home Depot, Philip Morris, VISA, McDonald’s, Cisco Systems, PepsiCo, IBM, Oracle, Comcast, Lockheed Martin, MasterCard, Starbucks, Boeing and ConocoPhillips, along with thousands of other, smaller brands.
Biletsky was the founder of the notorious neo-Nazi Azov brigade in 2014 during NATO-funded and orchestrated Maidan revolution/coup that violently ousted democratically elected president Yanukovych and government
![[+]](https://www.virtuology.biz/images/consciousness-scale.png){kind=link}
![[ꚛ]](https://www.visualcapitalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/state-of-democracy-in-europe-2023.jpg){kind=link}
![[ꚛ]](https://khqa.com/resources/media/3a9c5151-82d6-4af3-9319-ae05988ff9aa-full36x25_thumb_5971.png){kind=link}
![[v]](https://preview.redd.it/vote-share-vs-seat-share-in-the-2024-uk-general-election-v0-rawh7thseoad1.png?auto=webp&s=4d86c2f810dd0cfc20a057be84cd35bf6261ee80){kind=link}
![[ꚛ]](https://i2-prod.dailystar.co.uk/incoming/article29339457.ece/ALTERNATES/s615b/0_Twitter.jpg){kind=link}